Automatic field-of-view planning for magnetic resonance shoulder imaging using Deep Learning

IF 2 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Anton Sheahan Quinsten , Simon Joshua Hornisch , Marcel Gratz , Mathias Holtkamp , Michael Forsting , Kai Nassenstein , Lale Umutlu , Armin Lühr , Jens Kleesiek , Moon-Sung Kim , Aydin Demircioğlu
{"title":"Automatic field-of-view planning for magnetic resonance shoulder imaging using Deep Learning","authors":"Anton Sheahan Quinsten ,&nbsp;Simon Joshua Hornisch ,&nbsp;Marcel Gratz ,&nbsp;Mathias Holtkamp ,&nbsp;Michael Forsting ,&nbsp;Kai Nassenstein ,&nbsp;Lale Umutlu ,&nbsp;Armin Lühr ,&nbsp;Jens Kleesiek ,&nbsp;Moon-Sung Kim ,&nbsp;Aydin Demircioğlu","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2026.102197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Accurate prescription of oblique coronal and oblique sagittal field of views (FOV) is essential for diagnostic shoulder MRI. Manual planning is radiographer-dependent, time-consuming, and subject to inter- and intra-operator variability, leading to inconsistent image quality and incomplete coverage. Although deep learning (DL) has advanced automated scan planning in non-oblique planes, oblique shoulder prescriptions remain underexplored; an automated DL approach could standardize FOV prescription, reduce operator dependence, and improve reproducibility and workflow without compromising diagnostic quality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this retrospective multicenter study, 575 shoulder MRI examinations (2019–2025) from four sites were included. Sites A (n=151) and B (n=220) were used for training; testing was performed on sites C (n=61), and D (n=143). A two-stage pipeline was implemented using five oriented bounding box (OBB) variants of YOLOv11 (n, s, m, l, x): Stage 1 performed slice selection; Stage 2 performed FOV prescription. Performance was evaluated against radiographers' prescriptions using mean absolute slice difference (MASD, slices), intersection over union (IoU), and mean absolute angle difference (MAAD, degrees). Clinical utility was assessed by three raters.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The YOLOv11-OBB-l model achieved the lowest MASD for Stage 1 (1.016±0.153 slices). For Stage 2, YOLOv11-OBB-x performed best (coronal IoU, 0.847±0.003; sagittal IoU, 0.852±0.007; MAAD, 3.259±0.190°). During testing across each site, MASD ranged from 0.700±0.837 to 1.192±2.550 slices; MAAD from 2.811±2.348 to 4.396±7.158°; coronal IoU from 0.800±0.092 to 0.872±0.065; and sagittal IoU from 0.824±0.111 to 0.887±0.047. Mean clinical utility was 97.2%. Performance was noninferior to interrater variability across all sites and metrics.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>DL–based automated FOV prescription for shoulder MRI achieves performance comparable to radiographers, generalizes across institutions, and demonstrates high clinical utility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","volume":"57 3","pages":"Article 102197"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939865426000111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Accurate prescription of oblique coronal and oblique sagittal field of views (FOV) is essential for diagnostic shoulder MRI. Manual planning is radiographer-dependent, time-consuming, and subject to inter- and intra-operator variability, leading to inconsistent image quality and incomplete coverage. Although deep learning (DL) has advanced automated scan planning in non-oblique planes, oblique shoulder prescriptions remain underexplored; an automated DL approach could standardize FOV prescription, reduce operator dependence, and improve reproducibility and workflow without compromising diagnostic quality.

Methods

In this retrospective multicenter study, 575 shoulder MRI examinations (2019–2025) from four sites were included. Sites A (n=151) and B (n=220) were used for training; testing was performed on sites C (n=61), and D (n=143). A two-stage pipeline was implemented using five oriented bounding box (OBB) variants of YOLOv11 (n, s, m, l, x): Stage 1 performed slice selection; Stage 2 performed FOV prescription. Performance was evaluated against radiographers' prescriptions using mean absolute slice difference (MASD, slices), intersection over union (IoU), and mean absolute angle difference (MAAD, degrees). Clinical utility was assessed by three raters.

Results

The YOLOv11-OBB-l model achieved the lowest MASD for Stage 1 (1.016±0.153 slices). For Stage 2, YOLOv11-OBB-x performed best (coronal IoU, 0.847±0.003; sagittal IoU, 0.852±0.007; MAAD, 3.259±0.190°). During testing across each site, MASD ranged from 0.700±0.837 to 1.192±2.550 slices; MAAD from 2.811±2.348 to 4.396±7.158°; coronal IoU from 0.800±0.092 to 0.872±0.065; and sagittal IoU from 0.824±0.111 to 0.887±0.047. Mean clinical utility was 97.2%. Performance was noninferior to interrater variability across all sites and metrics.

Conclusion

DL–based automated FOV prescription for shoulder MRI achieves performance comparable to radiographers, generalizes across institutions, and demonstrates high clinical utility.
使用深度学习的磁共振肩部成像的自动视野规划
斜冠状位和斜矢状位视野的准确处方对肩部MRI诊断至关重要。手动规划依赖于放射技师,耗时,并且受制于操作员之间和操作员内部的可变性,导致图像质量不一致和覆盖不完整。尽管深度学习(DL)已经在非斜平面上推进了自动扫描计划,但斜肩处方仍未得到充分探索;自动化DL方法可以标准化视场处方,减少对操作人员的依赖,并在不影响诊断质量的情况下提高再现性和工作流程。方法在这项回顾性多中心研究中,纳入了来自四个部位的575例肩部MRI检查(2019-2025)。A点(n=151)和B点(n=220)用于培训;在C点(n=61)和D点(n=143)进行检测。使用YOLOv11 (n, s, m, l, x)的五个定向边界盒(OBB)变体实现了一个两阶段的管道:阶段1执行切片选择;第二阶段进行FOV处方。根据放射科医生的处方,使用平均绝对片差(MASD, slices)、相交/联合(IoU)和平均绝对角差(MAAD, degrees)来评估疗效。临床效用由三位评分者评估。结果yolov11 - obb - 1模型一期MASD最低(1.016±0.153片)。在第二阶段,YOLOv11-OBB-x表现最佳(冠状面IoU, 0.847±0.003;矢状面IoU, 0.852±0.007;MAAD, 3.259±0.190°)。在每个部位的测试中,MASD范围为0.700±0.837 ~ 1.192±2.550片;MAAD从2.811±2.348°到4.396±7.158°;冠状欠条由0.800±0.092增至0.872±0.065;矢状面IoU由0.824±0.111增至0.887±0.047。平均临床利用率为97.2%。在所有地点和度量标准中,性能不逊于解释器的可变性。结论基于dl的肩部MRI自动FOV处方的性能可与放射科医师相媲美,可在各机构推广,具有较高的临床实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
231
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists. This journal is published four times a year and is circulated to approximately 11,000 medical radiation technologists, libraries and radiology departments throughout Canada, the United States and overseas. The Journal publishes articles on recent research, new technology and techniques, professional practices, technologists viewpoints as well as relevant book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书