Anton Sheahan Quinsten , Simon Joshua Hornisch , Marcel Gratz , Mathias Holtkamp , Michael Forsting , Kai Nassenstein , Lale Umutlu , Armin Lühr , Jens Kleesiek , Moon-Sung Kim , Aydin Demircioğlu
{"title":"Automatic field-of-view planning for magnetic resonance shoulder imaging using Deep Learning","authors":"Anton Sheahan Quinsten , Simon Joshua Hornisch , Marcel Gratz , Mathias Holtkamp , Michael Forsting , Kai Nassenstein , Lale Umutlu , Armin Lühr , Jens Kleesiek , Moon-Sung Kim , Aydin Demircioğlu","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2026.102197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Accurate prescription of oblique coronal and oblique sagittal field of views (FOV) is essential for diagnostic shoulder MRI. Manual planning is radiographer-dependent, time-consuming, and subject to inter- and intra-operator variability, leading to inconsistent image quality and incomplete coverage. Although deep learning (DL) has advanced automated scan planning in non-oblique planes, oblique shoulder prescriptions remain underexplored; an automated DL approach could standardize FOV prescription, reduce operator dependence, and improve reproducibility and workflow without compromising diagnostic quality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this retrospective multicenter study, 575 shoulder MRI examinations (2019–2025) from four sites were included. Sites A (n=151) and B (n=220) were used for training; testing was performed on sites C (n=61), and D (n=143). A two-stage pipeline was implemented using five oriented bounding box (OBB) variants of YOLOv11 (n, s, m, l, x): Stage 1 performed slice selection; Stage 2 performed FOV prescription. Performance was evaluated against radiographers' prescriptions using mean absolute slice difference (MASD, slices), intersection over union (IoU), and mean absolute angle difference (MAAD, degrees). Clinical utility was assessed by three raters.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The YOLOv11-OBB-l model achieved the lowest MASD for Stage 1 (1.016±0.153 slices). For Stage 2, YOLOv11-OBB-x performed best (coronal IoU, 0.847±0.003; sagittal IoU, 0.852±0.007; MAAD, 3.259±0.190°). During testing across each site, MASD ranged from 0.700±0.837 to 1.192±2.550 slices; MAAD from 2.811±2.348 to 4.396±7.158°; coronal IoU from 0.800±0.092 to 0.872±0.065; and sagittal IoU from 0.824±0.111 to 0.887±0.047. Mean clinical utility was 97.2%. Performance was noninferior to interrater variability across all sites and metrics.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>DL–based automated FOV prescription for shoulder MRI achieves performance comparable to radiographers, generalizes across institutions, and demonstrates high clinical utility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","volume":"57 3","pages":"Article 102197"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939865426000111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Accurate prescription of oblique coronal and oblique sagittal field of views (FOV) is essential for diagnostic shoulder MRI. Manual planning is radiographer-dependent, time-consuming, and subject to inter- and intra-operator variability, leading to inconsistent image quality and incomplete coverage. Although deep learning (DL) has advanced automated scan planning in non-oblique planes, oblique shoulder prescriptions remain underexplored; an automated DL approach could standardize FOV prescription, reduce operator dependence, and improve reproducibility and workflow without compromising diagnostic quality.
Methods
In this retrospective multicenter study, 575 shoulder MRI examinations (2019–2025) from four sites were included. Sites A (n=151) and B (n=220) were used for training; testing was performed on sites C (n=61), and D (n=143). A two-stage pipeline was implemented using five oriented bounding box (OBB) variants of YOLOv11 (n, s, m, l, x): Stage 1 performed slice selection; Stage 2 performed FOV prescription. Performance was evaluated against radiographers' prescriptions using mean absolute slice difference (MASD, slices), intersection over union (IoU), and mean absolute angle difference (MAAD, degrees). Clinical utility was assessed by three raters.
Results
The YOLOv11-OBB-l model achieved the lowest MASD for Stage 1 (1.016±0.153 slices). For Stage 2, YOLOv11-OBB-x performed best (coronal IoU, 0.847±0.003; sagittal IoU, 0.852±0.007; MAAD, 3.259±0.190°). During testing across each site, MASD ranged from 0.700±0.837 to 1.192±2.550 slices; MAAD from 2.811±2.348 to 4.396±7.158°; coronal IoU from 0.800±0.092 to 0.872±0.065; and sagittal IoU from 0.824±0.111 to 0.887±0.047. Mean clinical utility was 97.2%. Performance was noninferior to interrater variability across all sites and metrics.
Conclusion
DL–based automated FOV prescription for shoulder MRI achieves performance comparable to radiographers, generalizes across institutions, and demonstrates high clinical utility.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists. This journal is published four times a year and is circulated to approximately 11,000 medical radiation technologists, libraries and radiology departments throughout Canada, the United States and overseas. The Journal publishes articles on recent research, new technology and techniques, professional practices, technologists viewpoints as well as relevant book reviews.