Machine learning aided meta-analysis of the impacts of non-biodegradable and biodegradable microplastics on soil microbial communities

Agriculture Communications Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-14 DOI:10.1016/j.agrcom.2026.100124
Wenwen Gong , Zongyu Wen , Gang Liang , Qingwei Bu , Xiaowei Liu , Anxiang Lu , Dongmei Geng
{"title":"Machine learning aided meta-analysis of the impacts of non-biodegradable and biodegradable microplastics on soil microbial communities","authors":"Wenwen Gong ,&nbsp;Zongyu Wen ,&nbsp;Gang Liang ,&nbsp;Qingwei Bu ,&nbsp;Xiaowei Liu ,&nbsp;Anxiang Lu ,&nbsp;Dongmei Geng","doi":"10.1016/j.agrcom.2026.100124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Microplastics (MPs) have emerged as significant pollutants in terrestrial ecosystems. However, their impacts on soil microbial communities remain poorly understood. In this study, a comprehensive meta-analysis has been conducted, integrating 1220 paired observations from 64 publications, with a particular focus on comparing the effects of non-biodegradable (Non-bio) and biodegradable (Bio) MPs. Additionally, a machine learning approach has been developed to predict these impacts and identify key contributing factors. Our dual-method approach enables a more precise and comprehensive assessment of MPs’ ecological consequences in soils. The findings revealed that Non-bio MPs reduced microbial diversity by 6.95 % but increased microbial biomass and altered community structure by 15.05 % and 55.76 %, respectively. In contrast, Bio MPs amplified these effects, increasing microbial biomass and community structure by nearly 3.4-fold and 4-fold, respectively. Notably, microbial functions increased by 7.52 % under Bio MPs, whereas Non-bio MPs showed no significant impact. Boosted Regression Tree (BRT) analysis identified soil properties (TN, TC, SOC, pH) and MPs characteristics (polymer type, size and concentration) as key drivers of microbial responses. Although Random Forest models achieved reasonable accuracy in predicting the impacts of MPs on microbial diversity and community structure, they performed poorly in predicting microbial functions due to complex and varying enzyme responses. This study highlights the importance of MP biodegradability and underscores the need for longer-term research and comprehensive risk assessments. Future work should prioritize expanded datasets and advanced modeling techniques to unravel the intricate interactions between MPs and soil microbial communities, ultimately supporting more sustainable environment management strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100065,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture Communications","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949798126000049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microplastics (MPs) have emerged as significant pollutants in terrestrial ecosystems. However, their impacts on soil microbial communities remain poorly understood. In this study, a comprehensive meta-analysis has been conducted, integrating 1220 paired observations from 64 publications, with a particular focus on comparing the effects of non-biodegradable (Non-bio) and biodegradable (Bio) MPs. Additionally, a machine learning approach has been developed to predict these impacts and identify key contributing factors. Our dual-method approach enables a more precise and comprehensive assessment of MPs’ ecological consequences in soils. The findings revealed that Non-bio MPs reduced microbial diversity by 6.95 % but increased microbial biomass and altered community structure by 15.05 % and 55.76 %, respectively. In contrast, Bio MPs amplified these effects, increasing microbial biomass and community structure by nearly 3.4-fold and 4-fold, respectively. Notably, microbial functions increased by 7.52 % under Bio MPs, whereas Non-bio MPs showed no significant impact. Boosted Regression Tree (BRT) analysis identified soil properties (TN, TC, SOC, pH) and MPs characteristics (polymer type, size and concentration) as key drivers of microbial responses. Although Random Forest models achieved reasonable accuracy in predicting the impacts of MPs on microbial diversity and community structure, they performed poorly in predicting microbial functions due to complex and varying enzyme responses. This study highlights the importance of MP biodegradability and underscores the need for longer-term research and comprehensive risk assessments. Future work should prioritize expanded datasets and advanced modeling techniques to unravel the intricate interactions between MPs and soil microbial communities, ultimately supporting more sustainable environment management strategies.
机器学习辅助对不可生物降解和生物降解微塑料对土壤微生物群落影响的meta分析
微塑料(MPs)已成为陆地生态系统中的重要污染物。然而,它们对土壤微生物群落的影响仍然知之甚少。在这项研究中,进行了一项全面的荟萃分析,整合了来自64份出版物的1220对观察结果,特别关注比较非生物降解(Non-bio)和生物降解(Bio) MPs的效果。此外,已经开发了一种机器学习方法来预测这些影响并确定关键的促成因素。我们的双方法方法能够更精确和全面地评估MPs在土壤中的生态后果。结果表明,非生物MPs减少了6.95%的微生物多样性,增加了15.05%的微生物量,改变了55.76%的群落结构。相比之下,Bio MPs放大了这些效应,微生物生物量和群落结构分别增加了近3.4倍和4倍。值得注意的是,生物MPs对微生物功能的影响增加了7.52%,而非生物MPs对微生物功能的影响不显著。增强回归树(BRT)分析发现,土壤特性(TN、TC、SOC、pH)和MPs特性(聚合物类型、大小和浓度)是微生物响应的关键驱动因素。尽管随机森林模型在预测MPs对微生物多样性和群落结构的影响方面取得了合理的准确性,但由于酶反应复杂多变,它们在预测微生物功能方面表现不佳。这项研究强调了MP生物可降解性的重要性,并强调了长期研究和全面风险评估的必要性。未来的工作应优先考虑扩展数据集和先进的建模技术,以揭示MPs与土壤微生物群落之间复杂的相互作用,最终支持更可持续的环境管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书