Metagenomic insights into antibiotic resistome in a paddy field soil marked by fertilization patterns

Agriculture Communications Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.agrcom.2026.100127
Xiangyu Yang , Meirui Mu , Lianfeng Du , Chang Xu , Zhuang Tian , Jinfeng Yang , Ruina Zhang , Xuan Guo
{"title":"Metagenomic insights into antibiotic resistome in a paddy field soil marked by fertilization patterns","authors":"Xiangyu Yang ,&nbsp;Meirui Mu ,&nbsp;Lianfeng Du ,&nbsp;Chang Xu ,&nbsp;Zhuang Tian ,&nbsp;Jinfeng Yang ,&nbsp;Ruina Zhang ,&nbsp;Xuan Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.agrcom.2026.100127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Novel fertilizers have emerged as viable alternatives to conventional fertilizers, effectively enhancing agricultural productivity–especially in paddy soils. However, their application may introduce emerging contaminants including antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). In this study, we systematically evaluated the impacts of three types of fertilizers–conventional chemical (CC), organic-inorganic composite (OI), and slow- and controlled-release (SC) fertilizers–on soil fertility, microbial communities, and ARGs in paddy fields of Xiong'an New Area, China. SC had the greatest effect on soil fertility, increasing nitrogen, phosphorus, and organic matter levels by 5.25 %–23.15 %. The abundance of ARGs varied with different treatments. Higher levels of ARGs, at 0.28 copies per 16S rRNA gene copy, were found in the surface soils of the CC and OI treatments, whereas lower levels, at 0.26 copies per 16S rRNA gene copy, were observed in the rhizosphere soil of the OI treatment. OI showed the highest abundance of top five subclasses ARGs in rhizosphere soil, indicating enhanced risk of ARG generation, especially in the rhizosphere. Additionally, OI resulted in higher microbial diversities, with key genera including <em>Streptomyces</em> (4.3 %–5.2 %), <em>Bradyrhizobium</em> (2.4 %–2.9 %), and <em>Sphingomonas</em> (2.1 %–2.7 %) showing positive correlattions with most ARGs. Redundancy analysis, network plots, and Mantel test indicated that nutrients explained 58.45 % of the variation in ARGs followed by soil properties. This study demonstrates that SC fertilizers represent a promising alternative for sustainable agriculture, effectively enhancing soil fertility while minimizing ARG dissemination risks. Our findings underscore the importance of implementing stringent contaminant management protocols when substituting conventional fertilizers with novel alternatives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100065,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture Communications","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949798126000074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Novel fertilizers have emerged as viable alternatives to conventional fertilizers, effectively enhancing agricultural productivity–especially in paddy soils. However, their application may introduce emerging contaminants including antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). In this study, we systematically evaluated the impacts of three types of fertilizers–conventional chemical (CC), organic-inorganic composite (OI), and slow- and controlled-release (SC) fertilizers–on soil fertility, microbial communities, and ARGs in paddy fields of Xiong'an New Area, China. SC had the greatest effect on soil fertility, increasing nitrogen, phosphorus, and organic matter levels by 5.25 %–23.15 %. The abundance of ARGs varied with different treatments. Higher levels of ARGs, at 0.28 copies per 16S rRNA gene copy, were found in the surface soils of the CC and OI treatments, whereas lower levels, at 0.26 copies per 16S rRNA gene copy, were observed in the rhizosphere soil of the OI treatment. OI showed the highest abundance of top five subclasses ARGs in rhizosphere soil, indicating enhanced risk of ARG generation, especially in the rhizosphere. Additionally, OI resulted in higher microbial diversities, with key genera including Streptomyces (4.3 %–5.2 %), Bradyrhizobium (2.4 %–2.9 %), and Sphingomonas (2.1 %–2.7 %) showing positive correlattions with most ARGs. Redundancy analysis, network plots, and Mantel test indicated that nutrients explained 58.45 % of the variation in ARGs followed by soil properties. This study demonstrates that SC fertilizers represent a promising alternative for sustainable agriculture, effectively enhancing soil fertility while minimizing ARG dissemination risks. Our findings underscore the importance of implementing stringent contaminant management protocols when substituting conventional fertilizers with novel alternatives.

Abstract Image

以施肥模式为标志的稻田土壤中抗生素抗性组的宏基因组研究
新型肥料已成为传统肥料的可行替代品,有效地提高了农业生产力,特别是在水稻土中。然而,它们的应用可能会引入新的污染物,包括抗生素抗性基因(ARGs)。本研究系统评价了常规化学肥料(CC)、有机无机复合肥料(OI)和缓释和控释肥料(SC)对雄安新区稻田土壤肥力、微生物群落和ARGs的影响。SC对土壤肥力的影响最大,提高了5.25% ~ 23.15%的氮、磷和有机质水平。arg的丰度因处理方式的不同而不同。在CC和OI处理的表层土壤中,ARGs含量较高,为每16S rRNA基因拷贝0.28个拷贝,而在OI处理的根际土壤中,ARGs含量较低,为每16S rRNA基因拷贝0.26个拷贝。OI根际土壤中前5个亚类ARG丰度最高,表明ARG产生的风险增加,特别是在根际土壤中。此外,OI导致了更高的微生物多样性,包括链霉菌(4.3% - 5.2%)、慢生根瘤菌(2.4% - 2.9%)和鞘单胞菌(2.1% - 2.7%)在内的关键属与大多数ARGs呈正相关。冗余分析、网络图和Mantel试验表明,养分解释了58.45%的ARGs变化,其次是土壤性质。该研究表明,SC肥料是可持续农业的一种有希望的替代方案,可有效提高土壤肥力,同时最大限度地降低ARG传播风险。我们的研究结果强调了在用新的替代品替代传统肥料时实施严格的污染物管理协议的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书