Closing the loop: Design, implementation, and evaluation of a regular-feedback network intervention for social connectedness and mental health

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Social Networks Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.socnet.2026.02.002
Mohammad Khalilian , Anthony R. Bardo , Claire M. Reardon , Amy Kostelic , Susie Thiel , Robert W. Krause
{"title":"Closing the loop: Design, implementation, and evaluation of a regular-feedback network intervention for social connectedness and mental health","authors":"Mohammad Khalilian ,&nbsp;Anthony R. Bardo ,&nbsp;Claire M. Reardon ,&nbsp;Amy Kostelic ,&nbsp;Susie Thiel ,&nbsp;Robert W. Krause","doi":"10.1016/j.socnet.2026.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Persistent increases in social isolation pose significant public health challenges, yet community interventions rarely leverage social network analysis longitudinally. Most network interventions rely on limited diagnostics. This study introduces and evaluates an adaptive intervention where longitudinal network data iteratively informed program design in real-time. Over eight weeks, we collected weekly sociocentric and ethnographic data from an intergenerational group of women participating in a creative movement program to enhance meaningful social connections and improve mental health outcomes. We used these data to guide weekly group pairings to increase cohesion, reciprocal relations, and intergenerational connections. The intervention’s effects on tie formation and maintenance were assessed using Stochastic Actor-Oriented Models (SAOMs), and mental health outcomes were compared to a control group. Results show that while adaptive group pairings facilitated the creation of new close ties, their impact on maintaining existing ties was limited. The intervention group experienced improvements in mental health compared to controls. This study demonstrates the value of a real-time, feedback-driven approach, moving network interventions from a limited diagnostic tool to an adaptive process. Our findings highlight the value of embedding longitudinal network designs into active program implementation and underscore the distinction between the mechanisms governing tie formation and maintenance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48353,"journal":{"name":"Social Networks","volume":"86 ","pages":"Pages 88-103"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Networks","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873326000146","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Persistent increases in social isolation pose significant public health challenges, yet community interventions rarely leverage social network analysis longitudinally. Most network interventions rely on limited diagnostics. This study introduces and evaluates an adaptive intervention where longitudinal network data iteratively informed program design in real-time. Over eight weeks, we collected weekly sociocentric and ethnographic data from an intergenerational group of women participating in a creative movement program to enhance meaningful social connections and improve mental health outcomes. We used these data to guide weekly group pairings to increase cohesion, reciprocal relations, and intergenerational connections. The intervention’s effects on tie formation and maintenance were assessed using Stochastic Actor-Oriented Models (SAOMs), and mental health outcomes were compared to a control group. Results show that while adaptive group pairings facilitated the creation of new close ties, their impact on maintaining existing ties was limited. The intervention group experienced improvements in mental health compared to controls. This study demonstrates the value of a real-time, feedback-driven approach, moving network interventions from a limited diagnostic tool to an adaptive process. Our findings highlight the value of embedding longitudinal network designs into active program implementation and underscore the distinction between the mechanisms governing tie formation and maintenance.
闭合循环:社会联系和心理健康的定期反馈网络干预的设计、实施和评估
社会孤立的持续增加构成了重大的公共卫生挑战,但社区干预很少纵向利用社会网络分析。大多数网络干预依赖于有限的诊断。本研究介绍并评估了纵向网络数据实时迭代地通知程序设计的自适应干预。在八周的时间里,我们收集了一个跨代女性群体的每周社会中心和人种学数据,这些女性参与了一个创造性的运动项目,以加强有意义的社会联系,改善心理健康状况。我们使用这些数据来指导每周的小组配对,以增加凝聚力,互惠关系和代际联系。采用随机因素导向模型(SAOMs)评估干预对关系形成和维持的影响,并将心理健康结果与对照组进行比较。结果表明,虽然适应性群体配对促进了新的亲密关系的建立,但它们对维持现有关系的影响有限。与对照组相比,干预组在心理健康方面有所改善。这项研究证明了实时反馈驱动方法的价值,将网络干预从有限的诊断工具转变为自适应过程。我们的研究结果强调了将纵向网络设计嵌入到主动计划实施中的价值,并强调了控制联系形成和维持的机制之间的区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Networks
Social Networks Multiple-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
12.90%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Social Networks is an interdisciplinary and international quarterly. It provides a common forum for representatives of anthropology, sociology, history, social psychology, political science, human geography, biology, economics, communications science and other disciplines who share an interest in the study of the empirical structure of social relations and associations that may be expressed in network form. It publishes both theoretical and substantive papers. Critical reviews of major theoretical or methodological approaches using the notion of networks in the analysis of social behaviour are also included, as are reviews of recent books dealing with social networks and social structure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书