Nebulization of a combination of low dose dexmedetomidine and ketamine versus dexmedetomidine alone as a premedication for children undergoing cleft palate repair surgeries: A prospective randomized clinical trial

IF 0.8 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.tacc.2026.101639
Fatma Nabil , Samar A. Abdellah , Deiaaeldin M. Tamer , Mohamed El-Shazly , Mohamed Galal Aly , Hany M. Osman
{"title":"Nebulization of a combination of low dose dexmedetomidine and ketamine versus dexmedetomidine alone as a premedication for children undergoing cleft palate repair surgeries: A prospective randomized clinical trial","authors":"Fatma Nabil ,&nbsp;Samar A. Abdellah ,&nbsp;Deiaaeldin M. Tamer ,&nbsp;Mohamed El-Shazly ,&nbsp;Mohamed Galal Aly ,&nbsp;Hany M. Osman","doi":"10.1016/j.tacc.2026.101639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sedation for young children who have cleft palate is challenging as poorly titrated sedation may result in respiratory depression, airway obstruction, or desaturation. The aim of this trial was to evaluate whether a nebulized combination of ketamine and low dose dexmedetomidine provides more effective preoperative sedation than dexmedetomidine alone in a higher dose for children undergoing cleft palate repair surgeries.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Fifty-six children, aged 1-4 years, who underwent cleft palate repair surgeries under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to receive preoperative sedation via nebulization either with a mixture of dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg) and ketamine (2 mg/kg) in group DK (n = 28) or dexmedetomidine (2 µg/kg) alone in group D (n = 28). The primary outcome was the level of sedation after 30 minutes of completion of the nebulization. The secondary outcomes included assessment of parental separation, anesthesia mask acceptance, postoperative emergence delirium, postoperative pain, and any adverse events.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median (Q1-Q3) University of Michigan Sedation Scale score after 30 minutes of completion of the nebulization was 2 (1.3-2) in group DK versus 1 (1-2) in group D (<em>P</em> = 0.013). Furthermore, group DK showed more accepted parental separation anxiety scores and more satisfactory mask acceptance scores than group D (<em>P</em> = 0.005 and 0.018 respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>As a premedication for children undergoing cleft palate repair surgeries, a nebulized combination of ketamine and low dose dexmedetomidine appeared to be more effective than dexmedetomidine alone in a higher dose. This combination was also associated with better parental separation and acceptance of the anesthesia mask.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44534,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 101639"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210844026000183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Sedation for young children who have cleft palate is challenging as poorly titrated sedation may result in respiratory depression, airway obstruction, or desaturation. The aim of this trial was to evaluate whether a nebulized combination of ketamine and low dose dexmedetomidine provides more effective preoperative sedation than dexmedetomidine alone in a higher dose for children undergoing cleft palate repair surgeries.

Methods

Fifty-six children, aged 1-4 years, who underwent cleft palate repair surgeries under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to receive preoperative sedation via nebulization either with a mixture of dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg) and ketamine (2 mg/kg) in group DK (n = 28) or dexmedetomidine (2 µg/kg) alone in group D (n = 28). The primary outcome was the level of sedation after 30 minutes of completion of the nebulization. The secondary outcomes included assessment of parental separation, anesthesia mask acceptance, postoperative emergence delirium, postoperative pain, and any adverse events.

Results

The median (Q1-Q3) University of Michigan Sedation Scale score after 30 minutes of completion of the nebulization was 2 (1.3-2) in group DK versus 1 (1-2) in group D (P = 0.013). Furthermore, group DK showed more accepted parental separation anxiety scores and more satisfactory mask acceptance scores than group D (P = 0.005 and 0.018 respectively).

Conclusions

As a premedication for children undergoing cleft palate repair surgeries, a nebulized combination of ketamine and low dose dexmedetomidine appeared to be more effective than dexmedetomidine alone in a higher dose. This combination was also associated with better parental separation and acceptance of the anesthesia mask.
低剂量右美托咪定联合氯胺酮雾化与单独右美托咪定作为腭裂修复手术儿童前用药:一项前瞻性随机临床试验
背景:对于腭裂患儿来说,镇静是一项挑战,因为滴定不良的镇静可能导致呼吸抑制、气道阻塞或去饱和。本试验的目的是评估氯胺酮和低剂量右美托咪定雾化组合是否比单独使用高剂量右美托咪定更有效地用于腭裂修复手术的儿童术前镇静。方法选择56例1 ~ 4岁全麻腭裂修补术患儿,随机分为DK组(n = 28)和D组(n = 28),分别采用右美托咪定(1µg/kg)和氯胺酮(2 mg/kg)混合雾化镇静。主要观察指标是完成雾化30分钟后的镇静水平。次要结局包括父母分离、麻醉面罩接受度、术后出现谵妄、术后疼痛和任何不良事件的评估。结果雾化完成30 min后,DK组的中位(Q1-Q3)密歇根大学镇静量表评分为2 (1.3-2),D组为1(1-2),差异有统计学意义(P = 0.013)。此外,DK组接受父母分离焦虑得分和面具接受得分均高于D组(P = 0.005和0.018)。结论氯胺酮联合小剂量右美托咪定雾化治疗腭裂修补术的疗效优于大剂量右美托咪定。这种组合也与更好的父母分离和麻醉面罩的接受有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
13.30%
发文量
60
审稿时长
33 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书