Seismic facies characterization: Integrated subsurface-outcrop analysis for complex depositional systems in northeast India

IF 5.4
Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-09 DOI:10.1016/j.aiig.2026.100196
Priyadarshi Chinmoy Kumar , Heather Bedle , Jitender Kumar , Tapos Kumar Goswami , Kalachand Sain
{"title":"Seismic facies characterization: Integrated subsurface-outcrop analysis for complex depositional systems in northeast India","authors":"Priyadarshi Chinmoy Kumar ,&nbsp;Heather Bedle ,&nbsp;Jitender Kumar ,&nbsp;Tapos Kumar Goswami ,&nbsp;Kalachand Sain","doi":"10.1016/j.aiig.2026.100196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Seismic facies analysis involves the interpretation of reflection patterns from seismic data to provide insights into subsurface sedimentary environments, depositional processes, and lithological variations, aiding georesources exploration. This study evaluates unsupervised machine learning (ML) models for seismic facies mapping within the Barail group from the Amguri region of the Upper Assam basin in northeast (NE) India. Utilizing high-quality three-dimensional seismic data, a comprehensive set of seismic attributes, including amplitude-based, instantaneous, spectral, geometric, and textural measures, is extracted, optimally selected, and integrated using two unsupervised models: the self-organizing map (SOM) and the generative topographic mapping (GTM). The two models are compared to identify the most effective approach for discerning seismic facies patterns within the Barail-Coal-Shale (BCS) and Barail-Main-Sand (BMS) units. Results indicate that GTM outperforms SOM by providing improved cluster separation, enhanced facies continuity, and greater geological consistency across the target interval in the study area. GTM-derived facies insights are validated with borehole and field data, facilitating an in-depth interpretation of the sedimentary environment. The BCS interval predominantly consists of coaly shale, coal-shale alternations, and minor sandstone facies, indicative of a swampy deltaic setting conducive to periodic vegetation accumulation. In contrast, the BMS interval primarily comprises sandstone with occasional shale and coal-shale intercalations, reflecting a fluvial-dominated environment. Post-depositional tectonic processes contributed to the deformation and structural complexity within these intervals. The proposed methodology (specifically data enhancement, attribute optimization, ML model comparison and integration of interpretations with different geoscientific data) demonstrates potential for application in other geological settings to enhance subsurface interpretation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100124,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 100196"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666544126000122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seismic facies analysis involves the interpretation of reflection patterns from seismic data to provide insights into subsurface sedimentary environments, depositional processes, and lithological variations, aiding georesources exploration. This study evaluates unsupervised machine learning (ML) models for seismic facies mapping within the Barail group from the Amguri region of the Upper Assam basin in northeast (NE) India. Utilizing high-quality three-dimensional seismic data, a comprehensive set of seismic attributes, including amplitude-based, instantaneous, spectral, geometric, and textural measures, is extracted, optimally selected, and integrated using two unsupervised models: the self-organizing map (SOM) and the generative topographic mapping (GTM). The two models are compared to identify the most effective approach for discerning seismic facies patterns within the Barail-Coal-Shale (BCS) and Barail-Main-Sand (BMS) units. Results indicate that GTM outperforms SOM by providing improved cluster separation, enhanced facies continuity, and greater geological consistency across the target interval in the study area. GTM-derived facies insights are validated with borehole and field data, facilitating an in-depth interpretation of the sedimentary environment. The BCS interval predominantly consists of coaly shale, coal-shale alternations, and minor sandstone facies, indicative of a swampy deltaic setting conducive to periodic vegetation accumulation. In contrast, the BMS interval primarily comprises sandstone with occasional shale and coal-shale intercalations, reflecting a fluvial-dominated environment. Post-depositional tectonic processes contributed to the deformation and structural complexity within these intervals. The proposed methodology (specifically data enhancement, attribute optimization, ML model comparison and integration of interpretations with different geoscientific data) demonstrates potential for application in other geological settings to enhance subsurface interpretation.
地震相表征:印度东北部复杂沉积体系的综合地下-露头分析
地震相分析包括从地震数据中解释反射模式,从而深入了解地下沉积环境、沉积过程和岩性变化,从而帮助勘探地质资源。本研究评估了印度东北部上阿萨姆邦盆地Amguri地区Barail组地震相测绘的无监督机器学习(ML)模型。利用高质量的三维地震数据,提取、优化选择了一套全面的地震属性,包括基于振幅的、瞬时的、光谱的、几何的和纹理的测量,并使用两种无监督模型进行整合:自组织地图(SOM)和生成式地形映射(GTM)。将这两种模型进行比较,以确定识别barail -煤-页岩(BCS)和barail -主-砂(BMS)单元地震相模式的最有效方法。结果表明,GTM优于SOM,在整个研究区域的目标层段中,GTM提供了更好的簇分离、增强的相连续性和更高的地质一致性。通过井眼和现场数据验证了gtm导出的相信息,有助于对沉积环境进行深入解释。BCS层段主要由煤页岩、煤页岩交替相和少量砂岩相组成,表明其为沼泽三角洲环境,有利于周期性植被聚集。相比之下,BMS层段主要由砂岩组成,间或有页岩和煤页岩夹层,反映了河流主导的环境。沉积后的构造作用增加了这些层段的变形和构造复杂性。所提出的方法(特别是数据增强、属性优化、ML模型比较和与不同地球科学数据的解释整合)显示了在其他地质环境中应用的潜力,以增强地下解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书