Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery teaching in the medical undergraduate curriculum: A Scottish perspective and suggestions for future improvement

Katherine A. Lowe , Mark F. Devlin
{"title":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery teaching in the medical undergraduate curriculum: A Scottish perspective and suggestions for future improvement","authors":"Katherine A. Lowe ,&nbsp;Mark F. Devlin","doi":"10.1016/j.adoms.2026.100621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Medical undergraduate teaching of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS) has been shown to be limited compared with other surgical specialties. This has a potential negative impact on informed decision making for future career choices and appropriate specialty referrals. National statistics demonstrate undersubscribed OMFS higher specialty posts, highlighting the importance of early exposure and continued improvements to training to attract, support and retain future trainees. The purpose of this project was to explore OMFS teaching in the Scottish university's medical curricula and to assess final year medical students' understanding of the specialty and training pathway. Four universities were contacted to explore OMFS teaching in the curriculum. Two universities responded; one centre included a 1-hour lecture in second year and a single theatre session in fourth year. The second centre included a 45-minute lecture in third year. Final year students were invited to complete a questionnaire exploring understanding of OMFS scope of practice and the training pathway. 22 responses were collected. 81.8% had poor knowledge of the specialty, 50% had limited understanding of the training pathway and 36.4% described no formal OMFS curriculum teaching. All participants were in favour of additional mandatory undergraduate teaching about OMFS to improve their understanding of the specialty and ability to make appropriate clinical referrals. Our results demonstrate that majority of medical students lack confidence in understanding the scope of practice of OMFS, emphasising the requirement for change in the undergraduate medical curriculum.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100051,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100621"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667147626000038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical undergraduate teaching of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS) has been shown to be limited compared with other surgical specialties. This has a potential negative impact on informed decision making for future career choices and appropriate specialty referrals. National statistics demonstrate undersubscribed OMFS higher specialty posts, highlighting the importance of early exposure and continued improvements to training to attract, support and retain future trainees. The purpose of this project was to explore OMFS teaching in the Scottish university's medical curricula and to assess final year medical students' understanding of the specialty and training pathway. Four universities were contacted to explore OMFS teaching in the curriculum. Two universities responded; one centre included a 1-hour lecture in second year and a single theatre session in fourth year. The second centre included a 45-minute lecture in third year. Final year students were invited to complete a questionnaire exploring understanding of OMFS scope of practice and the training pathway. 22 responses were collected. 81.8% had poor knowledge of the specialty, 50% had limited understanding of the training pathway and 36.4% described no formal OMFS curriculum teaching. All participants were in favour of additional mandatory undergraduate teaching about OMFS to improve their understanding of the specialty and ability to make appropriate clinical referrals. Our results demonstrate that majority of medical students lack confidence in understanding the scope of practice of OMFS, emphasising the requirement for change in the undergraduate medical curriculum.
医学本科课程口腔颌面外科教学:苏格兰视角及改进建议
与其他外科专业相比,口腔颌面外科(OMFS)的医学本科教学显示出局限性。这对未来的职业选择和适当的专业推荐有潜在的负面影响。国家统计数据显示,OMFS高级专业员额申请不足,突出了早期接触和持续改进培训以吸引、支持和留住未来受训人员的重要性。该项目的目的是探索苏格兰大学医学课程中的OMFS教学,并评估最后一年医科学生对专业和培训途径的理解。我们联系了四所大学,探讨在课程中引入OMFS教学。两所大学做出了回应;一个中心在第二年包括一个小时的讲座,在第四年包括一个单一的戏剧会议。第二个中心在第三年包括一个45分钟的讲座。最后一年的学生被邀请完成一份调查问卷,以了解OMFS的实践范围和培训途径。共收集了22份回复。81.8%的学生对专业知识不了解,50%的学生对培训途径了解有限,36.4%的学生没有正式的OMFS课程教学。所有参与者都赞成额外的强制性本科教学,以提高他们对该专业的理解和作出适当临床转诊的能力。我们的研究结果表明,大多数医学生对了解OMFS的实践范围缺乏信心,强调了本科医学课程改革的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书