Effect of dose escalation in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer on clinical and pathologic Response: A Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Kasra Kolahdouzan , Sepehr Nayebi Rad , Reza Ghalehtaki , Romina Abyaneh , Forouzan Nourbakhsh , Ehsan Saraee
{"title":"Effect of dose escalation in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer on clinical and pathologic Response: A Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Kasra Kolahdouzan ,&nbsp;Sepehr Nayebi Rad ,&nbsp;Reza Ghalehtaki ,&nbsp;Romina Abyaneh ,&nbsp;Forouzan Nourbakhsh ,&nbsp;Ehsan Saraee","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2026.101123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) increasingly highlights necessity of organ functionality preservation, with the achievement of a complete clinical or pathological response (CR) regarded as a fundamental treatment target. While established concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) is effective, it often results in only modest complete response rates, thus prompting exploration into the possible benefits of raising radiation dosages to boost clinical results. This <em>meta</em>-analysis of randomized controlled trials sought to elucidate whether dose-escalated neoadjuvant CRT augments tumor response and to evaluate its accompanying toxicity profile. By extracting data from 12 trials encompassing 1,803 patients, we discerned that the overall effect on a composite CR endpoint—incorporating both pathological and clinical complete responses—did not achieve statistical significance (RR 1.26, 95% CI: 0.95–1.68). Notably, the subgroup evaluation showed that in clinical trials with a uniform chemotherapy strategy for both control and experimental populations, raising the dosage led to an elevation in CR rates which was not statistically significant (RR 1.46, 95% CI: 1.00–2.12). Conversely, studies that altered concurrent chemotherapy did not show these benefits. Also, the assessment showed that raised radiation doses did not independently result in a marked rise in severe acute toxicity (RR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.53 – 1.59); instead, the gravity of toxicity appeared to be more directly associated with the chemotherapy methods used. These findings suggest that increasing radiation dose may modestly enhance tumor response in LARC. This technique corresponds with the progressing framework towards preserving organ function in rectal cancer.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630826000182","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) increasingly highlights necessity of organ functionality preservation, with the achievement of a complete clinical or pathological response (CR) regarded as a fundamental treatment target. While established concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) is effective, it often results in only modest complete response rates, thus prompting exploration into the possible benefits of raising radiation dosages to boost clinical results. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials sought to elucidate whether dose-escalated neoadjuvant CRT augments tumor response and to evaluate its accompanying toxicity profile. By extracting data from 12 trials encompassing 1,803 patients, we discerned that the overall effect on a composite CR endpoint—incorporating both pathological and clinical complete responses—did not achieve statistical significance (RR 1.26, 95% CI: 0.95–1.68). Notably, the subgroup evaluation showed that in clinical trials with a uniform chemotherapy strategy for both control and experimental populations, raising the dosage led to an elevation in CR rates which was not statistically significant (RR 1.46, 95% CI: 1.00–2.12). Conversely, studies that altered concurrent chemotherapy did not show these benefits. Also, the assessment showed that raised radiation doses did not independently result in a marked rise in severe acute toxicity (RR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.53 – 1.59); instead, the gravity of toxicity appeared to be more directly associated with the chemotherapy methods used. These findings suggest that increasing radiation dose may modestly enhance tumor response in LARC. This technique corresponds with the progressing framework towards preserving organ function in rectal cancer.
局部晚期直肠癌新辅助放化疗剂量递增对临床和病理反应的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)的治疗越来越强调器官功能保存的必要性,实现完全的临床或病理反应(CR)被视为基本的治疗目标。虽然已建立的同步放化疗(CRT)是有效的,但它通常只能产生适度的完全缓解率,因此需要探索提高辐射剂量以提高临床效果的可能益处。这项随机对照试验的荟萃分析旨在阐明剂量递增的新辅助CRT是否能增强肿瘤反应,并评估其伴随的毒性。通过从包含1803例患者的12项试验中提取数据,我们发现对复合CR终点(包括病理和临床完全缓解)的总体影响没有达到统计学意义(RR 1.26, 95% CI: 0.95-1.68)。值得注意的是,亚组评估显示,在对对照和实验人群采用统一化疗策略的临床试验中,增加剂量导致CR率升高,但没有统计学意义(RR 1.46, 95% CI: 1.00-2.12)。相反,改变同步化疗的研究并没有显示出这些益处。此外,评估显示,辐射剂量的增加不会单独导致严重急性毒性的显著增加(RR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.53 - 1.59);相反,毒性的严重程度似乎与所使用的化疗方法更直接相关。这些发现表明,增加辐射剂量可能会适度增强LARC的肿瘤反应。这项技术与保持直肠癌器官功能的进展框架相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书