Non-invasive ICP monitoring when invasive systems are available in the care of acute brain injured patients: a clinical approach.

IF 4.1
Chiara Robba, Edoardo Picetti, Alessandro Bertuccio, Carla Bittencourt Rynkowski, Gregory W J Hawryluk, Elisa Gouvea Bogossian, Randall M Chesnut, Marek Czosnyka, Andres M Rubiano, Lorenzo Calabro, Walter Videtta, Sergio Brasil, Fabio S Taccone
{"title":"Non-invasive ICP monitoring when invasive systems are available in the care of acute brain injured patients: a clinical approach.","authors":"Chiara Robba, Edoardo Picetti, Alessandro Bertuccio, Carla Bittencourt Rynkowski, Gregory W J Hawryluk, Elisa Gouvea Bogossian, Randall M Chesnut, Marek Czosnyka, Andres M Rubiano, Lorenzo Calabro, Walter Videtta, Sergio Brasil, Fabio S Taccone","doi":"10.1186/s44158-026-00356-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is considered the gold standard for the management of patients with an acute brain injury and at risk of developing intracranial hypertension (IH). However, invasive devices (e.g., intraparenchymal probe or external ventricular drain) are expensive, not available worldwide, and might be associated with some risks. Recently, a consensus for the monitoring and management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients when invasive ICP is not available (B-ICONIC) was developed. This approach is based on repeated neurological evaluation, neuroimaging, and the use of non-invasive ICP monitoring tools, such as transcranial Doppler, automated pupillometry, and ultrasound optic nerve sheath diameter measurement, to titrate interventions aiming at controlling ICP. Despite this clinical algorithm was mainly proposed for low and middle-income countries where invasive ICP is not widely implemented, a potential application of this approach may exist even in healthcare facilities where direct ICP monitoring is available. This includes patients who may have contraindications to invasive monitoring, such as coagulopathy, as well as those in whom ICP monitoring is not routinely implemented, such as individuals with post-anoxic brain injury or acute liver failure, for the reported occurrence of cerebral edema and potential risk of IH in these cases. Therefore, the aim of this manuscript is to propose the extension of the B-ICONIC algorithm to a wider population, regardless of the decision to insert an ICP sensor, and to guide their management using this multimodal approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"6 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12896017/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-026-00356-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is considered the gold standard for the management of patients with an acute brain injury and at risk of developing intracranial hypertension (IH). However, invasive devices (e.g., intraparenchymal probe or external ventricular drain) are expensive, not available worldwide, and might be associated with some risks. Recently, a consensus for the monitoring and management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients when invasive ICP is not available (B-ICONIC) was developed. This approach is based on repeated neurological evaluation, neuroimaging, and the use of non-invasive ICP monitoring tools, such as transcranial Doppler, automated pupillometry, and ultrasound optic nerve sheath diameter measurement, to titrate interventions aiming at controlling ICP. Despite this clinical algorithm was mainly proposed for low and middle-income countries where invasive ICP is not widely implemented, a potential application of this approach may exist even in healthcare facilities where direct ICP monitoring is available. This includes patients who may have contraindications to invasive monitoring, such as coagulopathy, as well as those in whom ICP monitoring is not routinely implemented, such as individuals with post-anoxic brain injury or acute liver failure, for the reported occurrence of cerebral edema and potential risk of IH in these cases. Therefore, the aim of this manuscript is to propose the extension of the B-ICONIC algorithm to a wider population, regardless of the decision to insert an ICP sensor, and to guide their management using this multimodal approach.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

急性脑损伤患者有侵入性系统时的非侵入性ICP监测:一种临床方法。
有创颅内压(ICP)监测被认为是管理急性脑损伤和颅内高压(IH)风险患者的金标准。然而,侵入性装置(如肝实质内探头或脑室外引流)价格昂贵,在世界范围内无法获得,并且可能存在一些风险。最近,对于创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者在没有侵入性ICP时的监测和管理(B-ICONIC)达成了共识。该方法基于反复的神经系统评估、神经成像和使用非侵入性ICP监测工具,如经颅多普勒、自动瞳孔测量和超声视神经鞘直径测量,来滴定旨在控制ICP的干预措施。尽管这种临床算法主要是针对侵入性ICP未广泛实施的低收入和中等收入国家提出的,但这种方法的潜在应用甚至可能存在于可直接进行ICP监测的医疗机构中。这包括可能有侵入性监测禁忌的患者,如凝血功能障碍,以及那些没有常规实施ICP监测的患者,如缺氧后脑损伤或急性肝衰竭的患者,因为在这些病例中报告了脑水肿的发生和潜在的IH风险。因此,本文的目的是建议将B-ICONIC算法扩展到更广泛的人群,无论是否决定插入ICP传感器,并指导他们使用这种多模式方法进行管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书