Exercise in type 1 diabetes: real-world data on glucose levels and hypoglycaemia risk from over 420,000 exercise sessions.

IF 10.2 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Diabetologia Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-13 DOI:10.1007/s00125-026-06672-y
Josip Zivkovic, Michael Mitter, Delphine Theodorou, Othmar Moser, Timor Glatzer
{"title":"Exercise in type 1 diabetes: real-world data on glucose levels and hypoglycaemia risk from over 420,000 exercise sessions.","authors":"Josip Zivkovic, Michael Mitter, Delphine Theodorou, Othmar Moser, Timor Glatzer","doi":"10.1007/s00125-026-06672-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims/hypothesis: </strong>This large observational cohort real-world study explored the effects of three forms of exercise (walking [WALK], aerobic excluding walking [AER] and anaerobic [ANAER]) on glucose levels and hypoglycaemia risk in type 1 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from 3248 users of mySugr Logbook and Apple Health (mean ± SD age 41.23±12.25 years; glucose management index of 7.05±1.09%; 41.5% were female) over a total of 428,058 exercise sessions. Acute and 24 h glycaemic effects were examined across exercise types. Post-exercise glycaemia data over 24 h were compared with sedentary glycaemic data. Time of exercise was used to assess the probability of nocturnal hypoglycaemia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Independent of type, exercise decreased glucose by -1.06±0.89 mmol/l. For the individual types of exercise, WALK decreased levels by -1.24±0.81 mmol/l, AER by -1.43±1.02 mmol/l and ANAER by -0.52±0.81 mmol/l (all p<0.001). Comparing sedentary days vs active days, the time in range (3.9-10 mmol/l glucose) increased by +2.08±6.06% for WALK, +2.94±6.46% for AER and +3.93±7.16% for ANAER, and the time below range (<3.9 mmol/l) increased by 0.37±1.57% for WALK, 0.74±1.70% for AER and 0.68±1.79% for ANAER (all p<0.001). ANAER yielded a smaller chance of acute hypoglycaemia and WALK yielded a smaller chance of nocturnal hypoglycaemia (p<0.001). Activities done after 15:30 hours did not increase the risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia when compared with earlier exercise sessions (+0.9±0.34%; p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions/interpretation: </strong>Aerobic activities decreased glucose more during exercise sessions than anaerobic exercise and yielded larger acute hypoglycaemia risk; anaerobic activities yielded the largest 24 h glycaemic improvements. More-intense exercise resulted in a larger nocturnal hypoglycaemia than walking; exercise timing was not a relevant contributor to nocturnal hypoglycaemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":" ","pages":"1457-1467"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13109116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-026-06672-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: This large observational cohort real-world study explored the effects of three forms of exercise (walking [WALK], aerobic excluding walking [AER] and anaerobic [ANAER]) on glucose levels and hypoglycaemia risk in type 1 diabetes.

Methods: Data were collected from 3248 users of mySugr Logbook and Apple Health (mean ± SD age 41.23±12.25 years; glucose management index of 7.05±1.09%; 41.5% were female) over a total of 428,058 exercise sessions. Acute and 24 h glycaemic effects were examined across exercise types. Post-exercise glycaemia data over 24 h were compared with sedentary glycaemic data. Time of exercise was used to assess the probability of nocturnal hypoglycaemia.

Results: Independent of type, exercise decreased glucose by -1.06±0.89 mmol/l. For the individual types of exercise, WALK decreased levels by -1.24±0.81 mmol/l, AER by -1.43±1.02 mmol/l and ANAER by -0.52±0.81 mmol/l (all p<0.001). Comparing sedentary days vs active days, the time in range (3.9-10 mmol/l glucose) increased by +2.08±6.06% for WALK, +2.94±6.46% for AER and +3.93±7.16% for ANAER, and the time below range (<3.9 mmol/l) increased by 0.37±1.57% for WALK, 0.74±1.70% for AER and 0.68±1.79% for ANAER (all p<0.001). ANAER yielded a smaller chance of acute hypoglycaemia and WALK yielded a smaller chance of nocturnal hypoglycaemia (p<0.001). Activities done after 15:30 hours did not increase the risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia when compared with earlier exercise sessions (+0.9±0.34%; p<0.01).

Conclusions/interpretation: Aerobic activities decreased glucose more during exercise sessions than anaerobic exercise and yielded larger acute hypoglycaemia risk; anaerobic activities yielded the largest 24 h glycaemic improvements. More-intense exercise resulted in a larger nocturnal hypoglycaemia than walking; exercise timing was not a relevant contributor to nocturnal hypoglycaemia.

1型糖尿病的运动:超过42万次运动中葡萄糖水平和低血糖风险的真实数据。
目的/假设:这项大型观察队列现实世界研究探讨了三种形式的运动(步行[WALK],有氧不包括步行[AER]和无氧[ANAER])对1型糖尿病患者血糖水平和低血糖风险的影响。方法:数据来自3248名mysugar日志和Apple Health用户(平均±SD年龄41.23±12.25岁,血糖管理指数为7.05±1.09%,其中41.5%为女性),共进行了428,058次锻炼。研究了不同运动类型对急性和24小时血糖的影响。将运动后24小时血糖数据与久坐血糖数据进行比较。运动时间用来评估夜间低血糖的可能性。结果:与类型无关,运动使血糖降低-1.06±0.89 mmol/l。对于不同类型的运动,WALK降低了-1.24±0.81 mmol/l, AER降低了-1.43±1.02 mmol/l, ANAER降低了-0.52±0.81 mmol/l(所有结论/解释:有氧运动比无氧运动更能降低运动期间的血糖,并且产生更大的急性低血糖风险;无氧运动产生最大的24小时血糖改善。更剧烈的运动比步行导致更严重的夜间低血糖;运动时间与夜间低血糖无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetologia
Diabetologia 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
18.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
193
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Diabetologia, the authoritative journal dedicated to diabetes research, holds high visibility through society membership, libraries, and social media. As the official journal of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, it is ranked in the top quartile of the 2019 JCR Impact Factors in the Endocrinology & Metabolism category. The journal boasts dedicated and expert editorial teams committed to supporting authors throughout the peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书