HYpofractionated, dose-redistributed RAdiotherapy (HYDRA) versus conventional radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: planned interim analysis and dosimetric comparison from the phase I HYDRA trial
Pascal A. Gunsch , Michiel Kroesen , Reno Debets , Stijn Keereweer , Esther van Meerten , Jaap Zindler , Erik van Werkhoven , Mischa Hoogeman , Gerda M. Verduijn , Remi A. Nout , Joris B.W. Elbers
{"title":"HYpofractionated, dose-redistributed RAdiotherapy (HYDRA) versus conventional radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: planned interim analysis and dosimetric comparison from the phase I HYDRA trial","authors":"Pascal A. Gunsch , Michiel Kroesen , Reno Debets , Stijn Keereweer , Esther van Meerten , Jaap Zindler , Erik van Werkhoven , Mischa Hoogeman , Gerda M. Verduijn , Remi A. Nout , Joris B.W. Elbers","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2026.101113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>(Chemo)radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx results in significant treatment burden and may cause radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL), which is associated with worse survival. We aim to reduce treatment burden and RIL using HYpofractionation and Dose-redistribution in patients treated with proton or photon RAdiotherapy (HYDRA, NCT05364411).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients receiving curative (chemo)radiotherapy for cT1-4 N0-3bM0 oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas are eligible. Referral for proton therapy is determined by model-based selection (MBS) according to Dutch protocols, resulting in a HYDRA-proton and HYDRA-photon cohort. HYDRA in 20 fractions constitutes 40 Gy to the elective volume, 55 Gy to gross tumour volume (GTV) + 5 mm and 59 Gy to GTV − 3 mm. Safety interim analyses are conducted in each cohort when ten patients complete 6 months follow-up. The interim results determine trial continuation and expansion to inclusion of laryngeal carcinomas according to predefined dose limiting toxicities (DLT). Per included HYDRA-patient, we perform an intra-patient plan comparison of the HYDRA plan versus the conventional treatment plan that was used for MBS.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The HYDRA-photon interim analysis (reached in March 2024, <em>n</em> = 10) showed one DLT (osteoradionecrosis), with no other late grade ≥ 3 toxicity after a median follow-up of 10.6 months. Among all enrolled HYDRA-patients (photons: <em>n</em> = 14; protons: <em>n</em> = 5), intra-patient plan comparison showed that HYDRA delivered a focal boost of Dmean 59.6 Gy (range 59.0–60.1 Gy) to the GTV, while on average, organs at risk received a reduced dose (HYDRA-photons: 0.4–4.5 Gy EQD2; HYDRA-protons: 2.1–5.0 GyE EQD2).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The predefined interim analysis of HYDRA-photons showed one DLT. Per protocol, inclusion of laryngeal carcinomas in the photon cohort is now possible. The 20 fraction HYDRA schedule delivers a focal boost to the tumour with reduced dose to all organs at risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101113"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563082600008X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
(Chemo)radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx results in significant treatment burden and may cause radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL), which is associated with worse survival. We aim to reduce treatment burden and RIL using HYpofractionation and Dose-redistribution in patients treated with proton or photon RAdiotherapy (HYDRA, NCT05364411).
Methods
Patients receiving curative (chemo)radiotherapy for cT1-4 N0-3bM0 oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas are eligible. Referral for proton therapy is determined by model-based selection (MBS) according to Dutch protocols, resulting in a HYDRA-proton and HYDRA-photon cohort. HYDRA in 20 fractions constitutes 40 Gy to the elective volume, 55 Gy to gross tumour volume (GTV) + 5 mm and 59 Gy to GTV − 3 mm. Safety interim analyses are conducted in each cohort when ten patients complete 6 months follow-up. The interim results determine trial continuation and expansion to inclusion of laryngeal carcinomas according to predefined dose limiting toxicities (DLT). Per included HYDRA-patient, we perform an intra-patient plan comparison of the HYDRA plan versus the conventional treatment plan that was used for MBS.
Results
The HYDRA-photon interim analysis (reached in March 2024, n = 10) showed one DLT (osteoradionecrosis), with no other late grade ≥ 3 toxicity after a median follow-up of 10.6 months. Among all enrolled HYDRA-patients (photons: n = 14; protons: n = 5), intra-patient plan comparison showed that HYDRA delivered a focal boost of Dmean 59.6 Gy (range 59.0–60.1 Gy) to the GTV, while on average, organs at risk received a reduced dose (HYDRA-photons: 0.4–4.5 Gy EQD2; HYDRA-protons: 2.1–5.0 GyE EQD2).
Conclusions
The predefined interim analysis of HYDRA-photons showed one DLT. Per protocol, inclusion of laryngeal carcinomas in the photon cohort is now possible. The 20 fraction HYDRA schedule delivers a focal boost to the tumour with reduced dose to all organs at risk.