Soil Moisture Estimation From Spire GNSS-Reflectometry Reflectivity: Semi-Empirical and Linear Regression Methods

IF 4.2 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Jiahua Zhang;Jan-Peter Weiss;John J. Braun;Ming Li;William Gullotta;Maggie Sleziak-Sallee
{"title":"Soil Moisture Estimation From Spire GNSS-Reflectometry Reflectivity: Semi-Empirical and Linear Regression Methods","authors":"Jiahua Zhang;Jan-Peter Weiss;John J. Braun;Ming Li;William Gullotta;Maggie Sleziak-Sallee","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3661820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study develops semi-empirical and linear regression algorithms to estimate near-surface soil moisture (SM) using reflectivity observations of Global Navigation Satellite System reflection (GNSS-R) signals collected by Spire Global commercial satellites. The semi-empirical method employs a forward model of GNSS-R reflectivity considering soil dielectric properties, vegetation attenuation, and surface roughness effects. As direct roughness measurements are unavailable globally, we obtain effective roughness attenuation maps using Cyclone GNSS (CYGNSS) reflectivity and SMAP SM and vegetation optical depth (VOD) data. Systematic biases between Spire and CYGNSS observations are also characterized and corrected. Daily gridded corrected Spire reflectivity observations at a 36-km resolution are used to invert soil dielectric permittivity and then SM. Linear regression parameters are also determined by correlating corrected Spire reflectivity measurements to SMAP SM data for each grid. Both algorithms are applied to six months of Spire data from late Jan to Jul 2024 and evaluated over Australia. The linear regression approach achieves better overall agreement with SMAP (correlation coefficient: 0.85, root mean squared difference (RMSD): 0.05 cm3/cm3) compared to the semi-empirical method (correlation: 0.64, RMSD: 0.07 cm3/cm3). The semi-emprical method demonstrates relatively better accuracy over sparsely vegetated regions with RMSD smaller than 0.06 cm3/cm3. Both methods show degraded performance over dense vegetation. Improved characterization of vegetation and surface roughness effects is essential to enhance retrieval accuracy. This work contributes to positioning GNSS-R as a complementary technology for independent SM observations.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"14 ","pages":"22162-22177"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11373179","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11373179/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study develops semi-empirical and linear regression algorithms to estimate near-surface soil moisture (SM) using reflectivity observations of Global Navigation Satellite System reflection (GNSS-R) signals collected by Spire Global commercial satellites. The semi-empirical method employs a forward model of GNSS-R reflectivity considering soil dielectric properties, vegetation attenuation, and surface roughness effects. As direct roughness measurements are unavailable globally, we obtain effective roughness attenuation maps using Cyclone GNSS (CYGNSS) reflectivity and SMAP SM and vegetation optical depth (VOD) data. Systematic biases between Spire and CYGNSS observations are also characterized and corrected. Daily gridded corrected Spire reflectivity observations at a 36-km resolution are used to invert soil dielectric permittivity and then SM. Linear regression parameters are also determined by correlating corrected Spire reflectivity measurements to SMAP SM data for each grid. Both algorithms are applied to six months of Spire data from late Jan to Jul 2024 and evaluated over Australia. The linear regression approach achieves better overall agreement with SMAP (correlation coefficient: 0.85, root mean squared difference (RMSD): 0.05 cm3/cm3) compared to the semi-empirical method (correlation: 0.64, RMSD: 0.07 cm3/cm3). The semi-emprical method demonstrates relatively better accuracy over sparsely vegetated regions with RMSD smaller than 0.06 cm3/cm3. Both methods show degraded performance over dense vegetation. Improved characterization of vegetation and surface roughness effects is essential to enhance retrieval accuracy. This work contributes to positioning GNSS-R as a complementary technology for independent SM observations.
利用塔尖gnss反射率估算土壤水分:半经验和线性回归方法
本研究开发了半经验和线性回归算法,利用Spire Global商业卫星收集的全球导航卫星系统反射(GNSS-R)信号的反射率观测来估计近地表土壤湿度。半经验方法采用考虑土壤介电特性、植被衰减和表面粗糙度效应的GNSS-R反射率正演模型。由于全球无法直接测量粗糙度,我们使用Cyclone GNSS (CYGNSS)反射率、SMAP SM和植被光学深度(VOD)数据获得有效的粗糙度衰减图。Spire和CYGNSS观测之间的系统偏差也被描述和纠正。每日36公里分辨率的网格化校正Spire反射率观测数据用于反演土壤介电常数,然后反演SM。线性回归参数也通过将校正后的Spire反射率测量值与每个网格的SMAP SM数据相关联来确定。这两种算法都应用于Spire从2024年1月下旬到7月的六个月数据,并在澳大利亚进行了评估。与半经验方法(相关系数:0.64,RMSD: 0.07 cm3/cm3)相比,线性回归方法与SMAP的总体一致性更好(相关系数:0.85,均方根差(RMSD): 0.05 cm3/cm3)。半经验方法在植被稀疏地区具有较好的精度,RMSD小于0.06 cm3/cm3。这两种方法在茂密的植被上表现出性能下降。改善植被特征和表面粗糙度对提高检索精度至关重要。这项工作有助于将GNSS-R定位为独立SM观测的补充技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Access
IEEE Access COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest. IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on: Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals. Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering. Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques. Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书