QB-optimal two-level designs for the baseline parameterization

IF 0.8 4区 数学 Q3 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
Xietao Zhou, Steven G. Gilmour
{"title":"QB-optimal two-level designs for the baseline parameterization","authors":"Xietao Zhou,&nbsp;Steven G. Gilmour","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2026.106380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There has been recent interest in the baseline parameterization for two-level factorial designs. The association matrix that expresses the estimator of effects under the baseline parameterization is obtained in an equivalent form as a linear function of estimators of effects under the traditional centered parameterization. This allows the generalization of the <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>Q</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>B</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> criterion which evaluates designs under model uncertainty in the traditional centered parameterization to be applicable to the baseline parameterization. Some optimal designs under the baseline parameterization seen in the previous literature are evaluated and it has been shown that at a given prior probability of a main effect being in the best fitted model from the experimental data, the design in the literature converges to being <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>Q</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>B</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> optimal as the probability of an interaction being in that model converges to 0 from above. The <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>Q</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>B</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> optimal designs for two setups of factors and run sizes at various priors are found by an extended coordinate exchange algorithm and the evaluation of their performances are discussed. Comparisons have been made to those optimal designs restricted to be level-balanced and orthogonal.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50039,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","volume":"244 ","pages":"Article 106380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037837582600008X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There has been recent interest in the baseline parameterization for two-level factorial designs. The association matrix that expresses the estimator of effects under the baseline parameterization is obtained in an equivalent form as a linear function of estimators of effects under the traditional centered parameterization. This allows the generalization of the QB criterion which evaluates designs under model uncertainty in the traditional centered parameterization to be applicable to the baseline parameterization. Some optimal designs under the baseline parameterization seen in the previous literature are evaluated and it has been shown that at a given prior probability of a main effect being in the best fitted model from the experimental data, the design in the literature converges to being QB optimal as the probability of an interaction being in that model converges to 0 from above. The QB optimal designs for two setups of factors and run sizes at various priors are found by an extended coordinate exchange algorithm and the evaluation of their performances are discussed. Comparisons have been made to those optimal designs restricted to be level-balanced and orthogonal.
基线参数化的最优两级设计
最近对两水平析因设计的基线参数化产生了兴趣。将表示基线参数化下效果估计量的关联矩阵等效为传统中心参数化下效果估计量的线性函数。这使得传统中心参数化中评估模型不确定性下设计的QB准则推广到基线参数化中。对先前文献中基线参数化下的一些最优设计进行了评估,结果表明,在给定的先验概率下,主效应位于实验数据的最佳拟合模型中,当交互作用位于该模型中的概率从上面收敛到0时,文献中的设计收敛于QB最优。利用扩展坐标交换算法找到了两种因素和运行规模在不同先验条件下的QB最优设计,并对其性能进行了评价。并与受水平平衡和正交限制的优化设计进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference
Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 数学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference offers itself as a multifaceted and all-inclusive bridge between classical aspects of statistics and probability, and the emerging interdisciplinary aspects that have a potential of revolutionizing the subject. While we maintain our traditional strength in statistical inference, design, classical probability, and large sample methods, we also have a far more inclusive and broadened scope to keep up with the new problems that confront us as statisticians, mathematicians, and scientists. We publish high quality articles in all branches of statistics, probability, discrete mathematics, machine learning, and bioinformatics. We also especially welcome well written and up to date review articles on fundamental themes of statistics, probability, machine learning, and general biostatistics. Thoughtful letters to the editors, interesting problems in need of a solution, and short notes carrying an element of elegance or beauty are equally welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书