Surgeon experience and procedure type are associated with intraoperative cost and efficiency in shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective multicenter study
Andrew M. Schmidt ME , Garrett K. Berger MD, PharmD , Rebecca L. Hill DrPH , Zimin Zhuang MS , Rebecca Gambatese MPH , Anna C. Davis PhD , Heather A. Prentice PhD , Anshuman Singh MD , Ronald A. Navarro MD
{"title":"Surgeon experience and procedure type are associated with intraoperative cost and efficiency in shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective multicenter study","authors":"Andrew M. Schmidt ME , Garrett K. Berger MD, PharmD , Rebecca L. Hill DrPH , Zimin Zhuang MS , Rebecca Gambatese MPH , Anna C. Davis PhD , Heather A. Prentice PhD , Anshuman Singh MD , Ronald A. Navarro MD","doi":"10.1016/j.sart.2026.151554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Shoulder arthroplasty is performed with increasing frequency, which has prompted greater attention to understand the drivers of procedural cost and surgical efficiency. While surgeon experience has been linked to improved outcomes in other orthopedic domains, its association with intraoperative cost and operative time in shoulder arthroplasty is unclear. In addition, differences in intraoperative resource utilization between anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) are not well defined.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of 4,143 primary elective aTSA and rTSA procedures performed between 2018 and 2023 across 21 centers within an integrated health care system. Surgeon experience was evaluated using 3 metrics: annual case volume, total prior shoulder arthroplasties, and years in practice. Cost data were categorized as implant and supply costs, and operative time was used to assess surgical efficiency. Nine multivariable generalized linear mixed models (3 predictors × 3 outcomes) were used, adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, procedure type, and surgery year, with surgeon included as a random effect.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Higher annual case volume (≥30 cases/y) was associated with 11% lower supply costs (<em>P</em> < .001) and 5% shorter operative times (<em>P</em> = .023). More years in practice (≥nine years) was associated with 6% shorter operative times (<em>P</em> < .001). Total prior arthroplasties were not associated with cost or operative time after adjustment. rTSA was associated with 36% higher implant costs, 8% lower supply costs, and 8% shorter operative times compared to aTSA (<em>P</em> < .001 for each).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Annual case volume and years in practice were associated with greater intraoperative efficiency in shoulder arthroplasty. rTSA demonstrated distinct resource utilization patterns compared to aTSA, highlighting the importance of procedure-specific benchmarking in optimizing surgical cost efficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"36 2","pages":"Article 151554"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452726000143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Shoulder arthroplasty is performed with increasing frequency, which has prompted greater attention to understand the drivers of procedural cost and surgical efficiency. While surgeon experience has been linked to improved outcomes in other orthopedic domains, its association with intraoperative cost and operative time in shoulder arthroplasty is unclear. In addition, differences in intraoperative resource utilization between anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) are not well defined.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of 4,143 primary elective aTSA and rTSA procedures performed between 2018 and 2023 across 21 centers within an integrated health care system. Surgeon experience was evaluated using 3 metrics: annual case volume, total prior shoulder arthroplasties, and years in practice. Cost data were categorized as implant and supply costs, and operative time was used to assess surgical efficiency. Nine multivariable generalized linear mixed models (3 predictors × 3 outcomes) were used, adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, procedure type, and surgery year, with surgeon included as a random effect.
Results
Higher annual case volume (≥30 cases/y) was associated with 11% lower supply costs (P < .001) and 5% shorter operative times (P = .023). More years in practice (≥nine years) was associated with 6% shorter operative times (P < .001). Total prior arthroplasties were not associated with cost or operative time after adjustment. rTSA was associated with 36% higher implant costs, 8% lower supply costs, and 8% shorter operative times compared to aTSA (P < .001 for each).
Conclusion
Annual case volume and years in practice were associated with greater intraoperative efficiency in shoulder arthroplasty. rTSA demonstrated distinct resource utilization patterns compared to aTSA, highlighting the importance of procedure-specific benchmarking in optimizing surgical cost efficiency.
期刊介绍:
Each issue of Seminars in Arthroplasty provides a comprehensive, current overview of a single topic in arthroplasty. The journal addresses orthopedic surgeons, providing authoritative reviews with emphasis on new developments relevant to their practice.