Age matters: Analyzing age-related discussions in app reviews

IF 3.8 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Journal of Systems and Software Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2026.112800
Shashiwadana Nirmani , Garima Sharma , Hourieh Khalajzadeh , Mojtaba Shahin
{"title":"Age matters: Analyzing age-related discussions in app reviews","authors":"Shashiwadana Nirmani ,&nbsp;Garima Sharma ,&nbsp;Hourieh Khalajzadeh ,&nbsp;Mojtaba Shahin","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2026.112800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, mobile applications have become indispensable tools for managing various aspects of life. From enhancing productivity to providing personalized entertainment, mobile apps have revolutionized people’s daily routines. Despite this rapid growth and popularity, gaps remain in how these apps address the needs of users from different age groups. Users of varying ages face distinct challenges when interacting with mobile apps, from younger users dealing with inappropriate content to older users having difficulty with usability due to age-related vision and cognition impairments. Although there have been initiatives to create age-inclusive apps, a limited understanding of user perspectives on age-related issues may hinder developers from recognizing specific challenges and implementing effective solutions. In this study, we explore age discussions in app reviews to gain insights into how mobile apps should cater to users across different age groups. We manually curated a dataset of 4163 app reviews from the Google Play Store and identified 1429 age-related reviews and 2734 non-age-related reviews. We employed eight machine learning, deep learning, and large language models to automatically detect age discussions, with RoBERTa performing the best, achieving a precision of 92.46%. Additionally, a qualitative analysis of the 1429 age-related reviews uncovers six dominant themes reflecting user concerns: <em>Age Appropriateness of Content, Language and Recommendations, Age Verification and Access Barriers, Usability and Accessibility Across Ages, Privacy and Safety Concerns, Interactions and Relationships</em> and <em>Recommendations and Feature Requests</em>. Our findings reveal that users frequently encounter inappropriate content for children, struggle with strict or error-prone age verification systems, and emphasize the need for age-friendly accessibility and safety features. To address these issues, we offer actionable recommendations for app developers, including implementing flexible or gradient-based age restrictions, prioritizing safety features in kids’ apps, and strengthening parental controls.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systems and Software","volume":"236 ","pages":"Article 112800"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systems and Software","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121226000348","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, mobile applications have become indispensable tools for managing various aspects of life. From enhancing productivity to providing personalized entertainment, mobile apps have revolutionized people’s daily routines. Despite this rapid growth and popularity, gaps remain in how these apps address the needs of users from different age groups. Users of varying ages face distinct challenges when interacting with mobile apps, from younger users dealing with inappropriate content to older users having difficulty with usability due to age-related vision and cognition impairments. Although there have been initiatives to create age-inclusive apps, a limited understanding of user perspectives on age-related issues may hinder developers from recognizing specific challenges and implementing effective solutions. In this study, we explore age discussions in app reviews to gain insights into how mobile apps should cater to users across different age groups. We manually curated a dataset of 4163 app reviews from the Google Play Store and identified 1429 age-related reviews and 2734 non-age-related reviews. We employed eight machine learning, deep learning, and large language models to automatically detect age discussions, with RoBERTa performing the best, achieving a precision of 92.46%. Additionally, a qualitative analysis of the 1429 age-related reviews uncovers six dominant themes reflecting user concerns: Age Appropriateness of Content, Language and Recommendations, Age Verification and Access Barriers, Usability and Accessibility Across Ages, Privacy and Safety Concerns, Interactions and Relationships and Recommendations and Feature Requests. Our findings reveal that users frequently encounter inappropriate content for children, struggle with strict or error-prone age verification systems, and emphasize the need for age-friendly accessibility and safety features. To address these issues, we offer actionable recommendations for app developers, including implementing flexible or gradient-based age restrictions, prioritizing safety features in kids’ apps, and strengthening parental controls.
年龄问题:分析应用评论中与年龄相关的讨论
近年来,移动应用程序已经成为管理生活各个方面不可或缺的工具。从提高生产力到提供个性化娱乐,移动应用程序已经彻底改变了人们的日常生活。尽管这些应用程序增长迅速且受欢迎,但在如何满足不同年龄段用户的需求方面仍存在差距。不同年龄的用户在与手机应用交互时面临着不同的挑战,从年轻用户处理不合适的内容,到老年用户由于与年龄相关的视觉和认知障碍而在可用性方面遇到困难。尽管已经有了创建包容年龄的应用程序的举措,但对用户对年龄相关问题的看法的理解有限,可能会阻碍开发人员认识到具体的挑战并实施有效的解决方案。在这项研究中,我们探讨了应用评论中的年龄讨论,以深入了解手机应用应该如何迎合不同年龄段的用户。我们手动整理了b谷歌Play Store中的4163条应用评论数据集,并确定了1429条与年龄相关的评论和2734条与年龄无关的评论。我们使用了8个机器学习、深度学习和大型语言模型来自动检测年龄讨论,RoBERTa表现最好,达到了92.46%的精度。此外,对1429条年龄相关评论的定性分析揭示了反映用户关注的六个主要主题:内容的年龄适宜性、语言和建议、年龄验证和访问障碍、跨年龄的可用性和可访问性、隐私和安全问题、交互和关系、建议和功能请求。我们的研究结果显示,用户经常遇到不适合儿童的内容,与严格或容易出错的年龄验证系统作斗争,并强调需要年龄友好的可访问性和安全功能。为了解决这些问题,我们为应用程序开发者提供了可行的建议,包括实施灵活的或基于梯度的年龄限制,在儿童应用程序中优先考虑安全功能,以及加强家长控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Systems and Software
Journal of Systems and Software 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
193
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Systems and Software publishes papers covering all aspects of software engineering and related hardware-software-systems issues. All articles should include a validation of the idea presented, e.g. through case studies, experiments, or systematic comparisons with other approaches already in practice. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: •Methods and tools for, and empirical studies on, software requirements, design, architecture, verification and validation, maintenance and evolution •Agile, model-driven, service-oriented, open source and global software development •Approaches for mobile, multiprocessing, real-time, distributed, cloud-based, dependable and virtualized systems •Human factors and management concerns of software development •Data management and big data issues of software systems •Metrics and evaluation, data mining of software development resources •Business and economic aspects of software development processes The journal welcomes state-of-the-art surveys and reports of practical experience for all of these topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书