Microservice logs analysis employing AI: A systematic literature review

IF 4.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Journal of Systems and Software Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2026.112786
Md Arfan Uddin, Shakthi Weerasinghe, Darek Gajewski, Melika Akbarsharifi, Roxana Akbarsharifi, Christopher Stoner, Tomas Cerny, Sen He
{"title":"Microservice logs analysis employing AI: A systematic literature review","authors":"Md Arfan Uddin,&nbsp;Shakthi Weerasinghe,&nbsp;Darek Gajewski,&nbsp;Melika Akbarsharifi,&nbsp;Roxana Akbarsharifi,&nbsp;Christopher Stoner,&nbsp;Tomas Cerny,&nbsp;Sen He","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2026.112786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><strong>Background</strong>: Microservice architectures generate massive volumes of fragmented log data. While complicating unified monitoring and diagnosis, traditional approaches are typically overwhelmed, leading to delayed incident detection and costly system failures. Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques, particularly machine learning and large language models, have emerged as promising solutions for automating log analysis and addressing these operational challenges. <strong>Objective</strong>: The objective of this study is to systematically review and synthesize existing research on AI techniques for microservice log analysis, evaluating their enterprise deployment readiness and identifying current capabilities, limitations, and priority areas for future investigation. <strong>Method</strong>: We conducted a systematic literature review of 2208 papers from peer-reviewed academic literature, published between 2018 and 2025. Through a rigorous filtering process, we identified 82 primary studies that thoroughly examine the use of AI for microservice log analysis across tools, techniques, datasets, and challenges. <strong>Results</strong>: While AI techniques are frequently applied to anomaly detection and root cause analysis, this review reveals a critical disconnect between research advances and industry needs. 65 studies rely on synthetic or private datasets that poorly reflect production complexities. Approximately two-thirds (65.85%) of papers adopt standardized evaluation benchmarks, with 59.76% using the standard Precision-Recall-F1 classification metrics. Hence, unresolved scalability, generalizability, and data accessibility remain the key challenges that prevent widespread adoption of AI-based microservice log analysis in enterprise environments. <strong>Conclusion</strong>: AI has strong potential for advancing log analysis in microservices. Future research should prioritize open datasets, robust benchmarking, and the use of these AI methods for deeper contextual understanding such as understanding why anomalies propagate across services and how they may impact business operations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systems and Software","volume":"236 ","pages":"Article 112786"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systems and Software","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121226000208","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Microservice architectures generate massive volumes of fragmented log data. While complicating unified monitoring and diagnosis, traditional approaches are typically overwhelmed, leading to delayed incident detection and costly system failures. Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques, particularly machine learning and large language models, have emerged as promising solutions for automating log analysis and addressing these operational challenges. Objective: The objective of this study is to systematically review and synthesize existing research on AI techniques for microservice log analysis, evaluating their enterprise deployment readiness and identifying current capabilities, limitations, and priority areas for future investigation. Method: We conducted a systematic literature review of 2208 papers from peer-reviewed academic literature, published between 2018 and 2025. Through a rigorous filtering process, we identified 82 primary studies that thoroughly examine the use of AI for microservice log analysis across tools, techniques, datasets, and challenges. Results: While AI techniques are frequently applied to anomaly detection and root cause analysis, this review reveals a critical disconnect between research advances and industry needs. 65 studies rely on synthetic or private datasets that poorly reflect production complexities. Approximately two-thirds (65.85%) of papers adopt standardized evaluation benchmarks, with 59.76% using the standard Precision-Recall-F1 classification metrics. Hence, unresolved scalability, generalizability, and data accessibility remain the key challenges that prevent widespread adoption of AI-based microservice log analysis in enterprise environments. Conclusion: AI has strong potential for advancing log analysis in microservices. Future research should prioritize open datasets, robust benchmarking, and the use of these AI methods for deeper contextual understanding such as understanding why anomalies propagate across services and how they may impact business operations.
使用AI的微服务日志分析:系统的文献综述
背景:微服务架构会产生大量碎片化的日志数据。传统的方法使统一监控和诊断变得复杂,通常会导致事件检测延迟和代价高昂的系统故障。人工智能(AI)技术,特别是机器学习和大型语言模型,已经成为自动化日志分析和应对这些操作挑战的有前途的解决方案。目的:本研究的目的是系统地回顾和综合用于微服务日志分析的人工智能技术的现有研究,评估其企业部署准备情况,并确定当前的能力、限制和未来调查的优先领域。方法:对2018年至2025年间发表的2208篇同行评议学术文献进行系统文献综述。通过严格的筛选过程,我们确定了82项主要研究,这些研究彻底检查了人工智能在微服务日志分析中的使用,包括工具、技术、数据集和挑战。虽然人工智能技术经常应用于异常检测和根本原因分析,但这篇综述揭示了研究进展与行业需求之间的严重脱节。65项研究依赖于合成或私人数据集,这些数据集不能很好地反映生产的复杂性。大约三分之二(65.85%)的论文采用了标准化的评价基准,59.76%的论文使用了标准的Precision-Recall-F1分类指标。因此,未解决的可伸缩性、通用性和数据可访问性仍然是阻碍在企业环境中广泛采用基于人工智能的微服务日志分析的主要挑战。结论:人工智能在推进微服务中的日志分析方面具有强大的潜力。未来的研究应该优先考虑开放数据集,稳健的基准测试,以及使用这些人工智能方法进行更深层次的上下文理解,例如理解为什么异常会跨服务传播以及它们如何影响业务运营。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Systems and Software
Journal of Systems and Software 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
193
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Systems and Software publishes papers covering all aspects of software engineering and related hardware-software-systems issues. All articles should include a validation of the idea presented, e.g. through case studies, experiments, or systematic comparisons with other approaches already in practice. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: •Methods and tools for, and empirical studies on, software requirements, design, architecture, verification and validation, maintenance and evolution •Agile, model-driven, service-oriented, open source and global software development •Approaches for mobile, multiprocessing, real-time, distributed, cloud-based, dependable and virtualized systems •Human factors and management concerns of software development •Data management and big data issues of software systems •Metrics and evaluation, data mining of software development resources •Business and economic aspects of software development processes The journal welcomes state-of-the-art surveys and reports of practical experience for all of these topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书