Amitabh Anand , Daniel Rottig , Miklós Stocker , Virginia Bodolica
{"title":"A multilevel framework for analysing organisational misconduct in emerging economies","authors":"Amitabh Anand , Daniel Rottig , Miklós Stocker , Virginia Bodolica","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2026.102563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Organisational misconduct in emerging economies (EEs) undermines trust in local markets, distorts competition, and creates considerable economic and societal costs, with implications that increasingly extend beyond national borders. International business scholarship on the topic has grown substantially and generated valuable insights, yet it remains fragmented and conceptually limited in important ways. Cumulative understanding of organisational misconduct in EEs is constrained by two critical issues. First, the literature is characterised by a persistent developed-country bias that relies on oversimplified dichotomisations between developed and emerging economies, obscuring institutional complexity and limiting theoretical insight. Second, existing studies predominantly adopt single-level analyses that fail to capture how organisational misconduct emerges from dynamic interactions across economy, organisation, and individual levels. To address these limitations, we advance a multilevel analytical framework that integrates economy-level institutional conditions, organisational processes, and individual behaviour, while drawing attention to the frequent misalignment between formal rules (de jure) and their enactment in practice (de facto). We conclude by outlining a research agenda for advancing understanding of organisational misconduct in EEs and by offering actionable guidance for managers and policymakers navigating the institutional complexities of emerging economies and interconnected environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"35 2","pages":"Article 102563"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593126000077","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Organisational misconduct in emerging economies (EEs) undermines trust in local markets, distorts competition, and creates considerable economic and societal costs, with implications that increasingly extend beyond national borders. International business scholarship on the topic has grown substantially and generated valuable insights, yet it remains fragmented and conceptually limited in important ways. Cumulative understanding of organisational misconduct in EEs is constrained by two critical issues. First, the literature is characterised by a persistent developed-country bias that relies on oversimplified dichotomisations between developed and emerging economies, obscuring institutional complexity and limiting theoretical insight. Second, existing studies predominantly adopt single-level analyses that fail to capture how organisational misconduct emerges from dynamic interactions across economy, organisation, and individual levels. To address these limitations, we advance a multilevel analytical framework that integrates economy-level institutional conditions, organisational processes, and individual behaviour, while drawing attention to the frequent misalignment between formal rules (de jure) and their enactment in practice (de facto). We conclude by outlining a research agenda for advancing understanding of organisational misconduct in EEs and by offering actionable guidance for managers and policymakers navigating the institutional complexities of emerging economies and interconnected environments.
期刊介绍:
The International Business Review (IBR) stands as a premier international journal within the realm of international business and proudly serves as the official publication of the European International Business Academy (EIBA). This esteemed journal publishes original and insightful papers addressing the theory and practice of international business, encompassing a broad spectrum of topics such as firms' internationalization strategies, cross-border management of operations, and comparative studies of business environments across different countries. In essence, IBR is dedicated to disseminating research that informs the international operations of firms, whether they are SMEs or large MNEs, and guides the actions of policymakers in both home and host countries. The journal warmly welcomes conceptual papers, empirical studies, and review articles, fostering contributions from various disciplines including strategy, finance, management, marketing, economics, HRM, and organizational studies. IBR embraces methodological diversity, with equal openness to papers utilizing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method approaches.