Facilitation mechanisms for supply chain resilience-oriented inputs: a digitalization and enterprise alliance based perspective

IF 10 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Gang Tian , Ziying Chen , Ziyi Xia , Hasnain Abbas , Weihua Liu
{"title":"Facilitation mechanisms for supply chain resilience-oriented inputs: a digitalization and enterprise alliance based perspective","authors":"Gang Tian ,&nbsp;Ziying Chen ,&nbsp;Ziyi Xia ,&nbsp;Hasnain Abbas ,&nbsp;Weihua Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2026.109962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Proactive inputs oriented toward supply chain resilience (SCR) are essential for enhancing SCR capabilities and enabling enterprises to adapt to highly uncertain environments. However, cost-benefit imbalances result in insufficient input incentives among firms. While an expanding literature examines digitalization's role in SCR, research findings remain inconsistent, complicating efforts to promote SCR-oriented proactive inputs in digital settings. The question of whether and how enterprise alliances can encourage such inputs in digital contexts remains unresolved. Based on this new reality, this study comprehensively considers the positive and negative impacts of digitalization. And analyzes the impact of the enterprise alliance mechanism in scenarios in which the market mechanism has failed. The results indicate that: (1) Digitalization exerts a significant nonlinear effect on firms' SCR-oriented proactive inputs, and this effect is bounded by two thresholds. Firms will only provide such proactive inputs when their digitalization level falls between these two thresholds. (2) The market mechanism encounters failure when the proportion of SCR-oriented proactive inputs to returns surpasses a critical threshold. This situation prompts firms to shift their behavior away from investing in resilience. (3) Enterprise alliance mechanism serves as an effective solution to address market failures, but require careful calibration of subsidy and penalty levels. This mechanism can only work if the subsidies and penalties exceed certain thresholds. However, when applied excessively, these measures have certain limitations. A medium level of subsidies and penalties can better promote SCR-oriented proactive inputs by firms. This study clarifies the conditions under which digitalization and enterprise alliance mechanisms act on SCR-oriented proactive inputs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Production Economics","volume":"295 ","pages":"Article 109962"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Production Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527326000538","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Proactive inputs oriented toward supply chain resilience (SCR) are essential for enhancing SCR capabilities and enabling enterprises to adapt to highly uncertain environments. However, cost-benefit imbalances result in insufficient input incentives among firms. While an expanding literature examines digitalization's role in SCR, research findings remain inconsistent, complicating efforts to promote SCR-oriented proactive inputs in digital settings. The question of whether and how enterprise alliances can encourage such inputs in digital contexts remains unresolved. Based on this new reality, this study comprehensively considers the positive and negative impacts of digitalization. And analyzes the impact of the enterprise alliance mechanism in scenarios in which the market mechanism has failed. The results indicate that: (1) Digitalization exerts a significant nonlinear effect on firms' SCR-oriented proactive inputs, and this effect is bounded by two thresholds. Firms will only provide such proactive inputs when their digitalization level falls between these two thresholds. (2) The market mechanism encounters failure when the proportion of SCR-oriented proactive inputs to returns surpasses a critical threshold. This situation prompts firms to shift their behavior away from investing in resilience. (3) Enterprise alliance mechanism serves as an effective solution to address market failures, but require careful calibration of subsidy and penalty levels. This mechanism can only work if the subsidies and penalties exceed certain thresholds. However, when applied excessively, these measures have certain limitations. A medium level of subsidies and penalties can better promote SCR-oriented proactive inputs by firms. This study clarifies the conditions under which digitalization and enterprise alliance mechanisms act on SCR-oriented proactive inputs.
供应链弹性导向投入的促进机制:基于数字化和企业联盟的视角
面向供应链弹性(SCR)的主动投入对于增强供应链弹性能力和使企业适应高度不确定的环境至关重要。然而,成本效益失衡导致企业之间投入激励不足。虽然越来越多的文献研究了数字化在SCR中的作用,但研究结果仍然不一致,这使得在数字环境中促进面向SCR的主动投入的努力变得复杂。企业联盟是否以及如何在数字环境中鼓励这种投入的问题仍未得到解决。基于这一新的现实,本研究综合考虑了数字化的积极和消极影响。并分析了市场机制失效情况下企业联盟机制的影响。研究结果表明:(1)数字化对企业面向供应链的主动投入具有显著的非线性影响,且这种影响受两个阈值约束。只有当企业的数字化水平处于这两个阈值之间时,企业才会提供这种主动投入。(2)市场机制在以企业为导向的主动投入占回报的比例超过临界阈值时发生失效。这种情况促使公司改变他们的行为,不再投资于弹性。(3)企业联盟机制是解决市场失灵的有效方法,但需要仔细校准补贴和处罚水平。这一机制只有在补贴和处罚超过一定阈值的情况下才能发挥作用。但是,如果过度使用,这些措施也有一定的局限性。中等水平的补贴和处罚可以更好地促进企业以企业利益为导向的主动投入。本研究阐明了数字化和企业联盟机制对企业战略导向的主动投入的作用条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Production Economics
International Journal of Production Economics 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
266
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Production Economics focuses on the interface between engineering and management. It covers all aspects of manufacturing and process industries, as well as production in general. The journal is interdisciplinary, considering activities throughout the product life cycle and material flow cycle. It aims to disseminate knowledge for improving industrial practice and strengthening the theoretical base for decision making. The journal serves as a forum for exchanging ideas and presenting new developments in theory and application, combining academic standards with practical value for industrial applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书