Predictive modeling of Oil–Water interfacial tension using biosurfactant parameters and machine learning approaches

IF 3.8 2区 化学 Q2 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Mustafa Abdullah , Raed Alfilh , Tariq Abdulkader Alrihaim , Raghavendra Rao P S , Abinash Mahapatro , Karthikeyan A , Harjot Singh Gill , Yashwant Singh Bisht , Siya Singla , Tabib Shahzada
{"title":"Predictive modeling of Oil–Water interfacial tension using biosurfactant parameters and machine learning approaches","authors":"Mustafa Abdullah ,&nbsp;Raed Alfilh ,&nbsp;Tariq Abdulkader Alrihaim ,&nbsp;Raghavendra Rao P S ,&nbsp;Abinash Mahapatro ,&nbsp;Karthikeyan A ,&nbsp;Harjot Singh Gill ,&nbsp;Yashwant Singh Bisht ,&nbsp;Siya Singla ,&nbsp;Tabib Shahzada","doi":"10.1016/j.chemolab.2026.105632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Oil–water interfacial tension (IFT) governs many industrial phenomena in petroleum recovery and environmental remediation, yet its experimental determination under complex biosurfactant–crude oil–water conditions is laborious and resource-intensive. This study aimed to develop a robust machine learning framework capable of accurately predicting IFT from physicochemical descriptors of biosurfactant and crude oil systems, thereby reducing empirical dependency through data-driven modeling. A dataset containing 1480 laboratory measurements was compiled from peer-reviewed sources and characterized by eight explanatory variables, Head charge, Molecular Weight, hydroxyl and carboxyl group counts (OH, COOH), biosurfactant concentration, oil API gravity, oil–air interfacial tension, and acid number. Models including Decision Tree, Random Forest, AdaBoost, Ensemble Learning, Support Vector Regression (SVR), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP-ANN) were optimized and evaluated using five-fold cross-validation with R<sup>2</sup>, MSE, and AARE % metrics. Results evidenced superior performance for ensemble-based algorithms, particularly Random Forest (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.957, MSE = 0.46) and AdaBoost (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.978, MSE = 0.24), exhibiting high stability and minimal prediction error. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis identified COOH and oil compositional variables (API and acid number) as the most influential predictors, aligning with theoretical expectations regarding polarity and molecular orientation at the oil–water interface. Overall findings demonstrate that properly tuned ensemble learning provides a physically interpretable, highly accurate surrogate to laboratory IFT measurement, revealing clear structural–functional dependencies across biosurfactant systems and supporting its broader integration into predictive material design and green petroleum applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9774,"journal":{"name":"Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems","volume":"270 ","pages":"Article 105632"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169743926000055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oil–water interfacial tension (IFT) governs many industrial phenomena in petroleum recovery and environmental remediation, yet its experimental determination under complex biosurfactant–crude oil–water conditions is laborious and resource-intensive. This study aimed to develop a robust machine learning framework capable of accurately predicting IFT from physicochemical descriptors of biosurfactant and crude oil systems, thereby reducing empirical dependency through data-driven modeling. A dataset containing 1480 laboratory measurements was compiled from peer-reviewed sources and characterized by eight explanatory variables, Head charge, Molecular Weight, hydroxyl and carboxyl group counts (OH, COOH), biosurfactant concentration, oil API gravity, oil–air interfacial tension, and acid number. Models including Decision Tree, Random Forest, AdaBoost, Ensemble Learning, Support Vector Regression (SVR), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP-ANN) were optimized and evaluated using five-fold cross-validation with R2, MSE, and AARE % metrics. Results evidenced superior performance for ensemble-based algorithms, particularly Random Forest (R2 = 0.957, MSE = 0.46) and AdaBoost (R2 = 0.978, MSE = 0.24), exhibiting high stability and minimal prediction error. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis identified COOH and oil compositional variables (API and acid number) as the most influential predictors, aligning with theoretical expectations regarding polarity and molecular orientation at the oil–water interface. Overall findings demonstrate that properly tuned ensemble learning provides a physically interpretable, highly accurate surrogate to laboratory IFT measurement, revealing clear structural–functional dependencies across biosurfactant systems and supporting its broader integration into predictive material design and green petroleum applications.
基于生物表面活性剂参数和机器学习方法的油水界面张力预测建模
油水界面张力(IFT)控制着石油开采和环境修复中的许多工业现象,但在复杂的生物表面活性剂-原油-水条件下进行油水界面张力的实验测定是费力且耗费资源的。本研究旨在开发一个强大的机器学习框架,能够从生物表面活性剂和原油系统的理化描述符中准确预测IFT,从而通过数据驱动的建模减少对经验的依赖。数据集包含1480个实验室测量数据,由8个解释变量组成:头电荷、分子量、羟基和羧基计数(OH、COOH)、生物表面活性剂浓度、石油API重力、油气界面张力和酸值。包括决策树、随机森林、AdaBoost、集成学习、支持向量回归(SVR)、卷积神经网络(CNN)和多层感知器(MLP-ANN)在内的模型进行了优化,并使用R2、MSE和AARE %指标进行了五重交叉验证。结果表明,基于集合的算法具有较好的预测性能,特别是Random Forest (R2 = 0.957, MSE = 0.46)和AdaBoost (R2 = 0.978, MSE = 0.24),具有较高的稳定性和最小的预测误差。SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations)分析确定COOH和油成分变量(API和酸值)是最具影响力的预测因素,与油水界面极性和分子取向的理论预期一致。总体研究结果表明,适当调整的集成学习为实验室IFT测量提供了物理上可解释的、高度准确的替代方法,揭示了生物表面活性剂系统之间清晰的结构-功能依赖关系,并支持其更广泛地集成到预测材料设计和绿色石油应用中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
169
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems publishes original research papers, short communications, reviews, tutorials and Original Software Publications reporting on development of novel statistical, mathematical, or computer techniques in Chemistry and related disciplines. Chemometrics is the chemical discipline that uses mathematical and statistical methods to design or select optimal procedures and experiments, and to provide maximum chemical information by analysing chemical data. The journal deals with the following topics: 1) Development of new statistical, mathematical and chemometrical methods for Chemistry and related fields (Environmental Chemistry, Biochemistry, Toxicology, System Biology, -Omics, etc.) 2) Novel applications of chemometrics to all branches of Chemistry and related fields (typical domains of interest are: process data analysis, experimental design, data mining, signal processing, supervised modelling, decision making, robust statistics, mixture analysis, multivariate calibration etc.) Routine applications of established chemometrical techniques will not be considered. 3) Development of new software that provides novel tools or truly advances the use of chemometrical methods. 4) Well characterized data sets to test performance for the new methods and software. The journal complies with International Committee of Medical Journal Editors'' Uniform requirements for manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书