Antimicrobial dressings for the prevention of surgical-site infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 8.8
Suraya M Yusuf, Jonathan James, Bryant Chong, Esmee Dohle, Luka Jovanovic, Soma Farag, Ryckie G Wade, Justin C R Wormald
{"title":"Antimicrobial dressings for the prevention of surgical-site infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Suraya M Yusuf, Jonathan James, Bryant Chong, Esmee Dohle, Luka Jovanovic, Soma Farag, Ryckie G Wade, Justin C R Wormald","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znaf277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical-site infections (SSIs) are a leading cause of postoperative morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and significant healthcare costs. Antimicrobial dressings may mitigate SSI risk by minimizing local microbial burden, but their effectiveness remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from inception up to 5 July 2024, supplemented by searches of the grey literature and citation chasing. RCTs comparing antimicrobial dressings with any other inert dressing for closed incisional wounds after elective or emergency surgery were included. Data were extracted in duplicate, risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and certainty of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. Pairwise random-effects meta-analyses were performed. The primary outcome was SSI within 30 days (90 days if prosthesis used); secondary outcomes included adverse events and costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 35 RCTs involving 8718 participants were included. Meta-analyses were conducted for silver (21 studies, 5504 participants), dialkylcarbamoyl chloride (DACC) (3 studies, 892 participants), and mupirocin (3 studies, 1320 participants). Compared with standard dressings, silver dressings reduced the risk of SSI by 22% (risk ratio (RR) 0.78 (95% c.i. 0.62 to 0.97); I2 = 43%; moderate-certainty evidence). DACC dressings halved the risk of SSI (RR 0.49 (95% c.i. 0.29 to 0.83); I2 = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence) compared with standard dressings. Mupirocin dressings were not associated with SSI prevention (RR 0.62 (95% c.i. 0.15 to 2.63); I2 = 67%; very low-certainty evidence). Evidence for other agents was insufficient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Silver and DACC dressings probably reduce the risk of SSI in closed surgical wounds. There is residual uncertainty over the clinical effectiveness of other antimicrobial dressings.</p>","PeriodicalId":520792,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of surgery","volume":"113 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical-site infections (SSIs) are a leading cause of postoperative morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and significant healthcare costs. Antimicrobial dressings may mitigate SSI risk by minimizing local microbial burden, but their effectiveness remains uncertain.

Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from inception up to 5 July 2024, supplemented by searches of the grey literature and citation chasing. RCTs comparing antimicrobial dressings with any other inert dressing for closed incisional wounds after elective or emergency surgery were included. Data were extracted in duplicate, risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and certainty of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. Pairwise random-effects meta-analyses were performed. The primary outcome was SSI within 30 days (90 days if prosthesis used); secondary outcomes included adverse events and costs.

Results: A total of 35 RCTs involving 8718 participants were included. Meta-analyses were conducted for silver (21 studies, 5504 participants), dialkylcarbamoyl chloride (DACC) (3 studies, 892 participants), and mupirocin (3 studies, 1320 participants). Compared with standard dressings, silver dressings reduced the risk of SSI by 22% (risk ratio (RR) 0.78 (95% c.i. 0.62 to 0.97); I2 = 43%; moderate-certainty evidence). DACC dressings halved the risk of SSI (RR 0.49 (95% c.i. 0.29 to 0.83); I2 = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence) compared with standard dressings. Mupirocin dressings were not associated with SSI prevention (RR 0.62 (95% c.i. 0.15 to 2.63); I2 = 67%; very low-certainty evidence). Evidence for other agents was insufficient.

Conclusion: Silver and DACC dressings probably reduce the risk of SSI in closed surgical wounds. There is residual uncertainty over the clinical effectiveness of other antimicrobial dressings.

抗菌敷料预防手术部位感染:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:手术部位感染(ssi)是术后发病率、住院时间延长和医疗费用增加的主要原因。抗菌敷料可能通过减少局部微生物负担来减轻SSI风险,但其有效性仍不确定。方法:检索MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL和Cochrane CENTRAL自成立至2024年7月5日,并辅以灰色文献检索和引文追踪。包括比较抗菌敷料与任何其他惰性敷料用于选择性或紧急手术后闭合切口伤口的随机对照试验。数据一式两份提取,使用Cochrane RoB 2工具评估偏倚风险(RoB),使用分级推荐评估、发展和评价(GRADE)工具评估证据的确定性。进行两两随机效应荟萃分析。主要结局为30天内的SSI(如果使用假体则为90天);次要结局包括不良事件和费用。结果:共纳入35项rct,受试者8718人。对银(21项研究,5504名参与者)、二烷基氨基甲酰氯(DACC)(3项研究,892名参与者)和莫匹罗星(3项研究,1320名参与者)进行了荟萃分析。与标准敷料相比,银敷料降低了22%的SSI风险(风险比(RR) 0.78 (95% ci 0.62 ~ 0.97);I2 = 43%;moderate-certainty证据)。DACC敷料使SSI风险减半(RR 0.49 (95% ci 0.29 - 0.83);I2 = 0%;中等确定性证据)与标准敷料相比。莫匹罗星敷料与SSI预防无关(RR 0.62 (95% ci . 0.15 ~ 2.63);I2 = 67%;非常低确定性证据)。其他药物的证据不足。结论:银和DACC敷料可降低闭合性手术创面SSI的发生风险。其他抗菌敷料的临床有效性仍存在不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书