Brief Report: Intersectional Stigma Associations With Long-Acting Injectable PrEP Willingness and Preference Among Cisgender Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Brief Quantitative Report.

Jennifer L Glick, Danielle F Nestadt, Travis Sanchez, Irah L Lucas, Mariah Valentine-Graves, Thomas Carpino, Duygu Islek, Kaitlyn Atkins, Sarah M Murray, Stefan Baral, Supriya Sarkar, Leigh Ragone, Vani Vannappagari
{"title":"Brief Report: Intersectional Stigma Associations With Long-Acting Injectable PrEP Willingness and Preference Among Cisgender Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Brief Quantitative Report.","authors":"Jennifer L Glick, Danielle F Nestadt, Travis Sanchez, Irah L Lucas, Mariah Valentine-Graves, Thomas Carpino, Duygu Islek, Kaitlyn Atkins, Sarah M Murray, Stefan Baral, Supriya Sarkar, Leigh Ragone, Vani Vannappagari","doi":"10.1097/QAI.0000000000003850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) in the United States are disproportionately affected by the HIV epidemic. Long-acting injectable pre-exposure prophylaxis (LAI-PrEP) represents a novel HIV prevention strategy. However, stigma remains a barrier to HIV-related prevention and care. We investigated the role of intersectional stigma in LAI-PrEP preferences among past-year PrEP-naive, HIV-negative US cisgender GBMSM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 2022 American Men's Internet Survey enrolled cisgender GBMSM online between October 2022 and October 2023. Using bivariate and multivariable adjusted Poisson regression with robust variance and a modified Intersectional Discrimination Index to examine associations between several forms of stigma-anticipated, day-to-day, social systems exclusion, and violence and harassment-and LAI-PrEP willingness and preference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among participants (N = 1196), 705 (59.0%) were willing to use any PrEP modality and 393 (32.9%) were willing to use LAI-PrEP, among whom 211 (29.9%) reported a preference for LAI-PrEP. On average, participants experienced 1.8 of 7 anticipated discrimination items, 3.9 of 7 day-to-day discrimination items, 0.2 of 3 social systems exclusion items, and 0.9 of 4 violence/harassment items. Willingness to use LAI-PrEP was associated with anticipated stigma (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02 to 1.10; P < 0.01). Preference for LAI-PrEP was associated with anticipated stigma (aPR = 1.06; 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.12; P = 0.04), day-to-day (aPR = 1.09; 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.15; P = 0.01) stigma, and violence/harassment (aPR = 1.09; 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.18; p-0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given disproportionate HIV burden among GBMSM, a range of HIV PrEP modality options combined with efforts to address intersectional anticipated and enacted stigma among GBMSM is critical to ensure PrEP access, uptake, and adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":520658,"journal":{"name":"Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)","volume":" ","pages":"580-585"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000003850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) in the United States are disproportionately affected by the HIV epidemic. Long-acting injectable pre-exposure prophylaxis (LAI-PrEP) represents a novel HIV prevention strategy. However, stigma remains a barrier to HIV-related prevention and care. We investigated the role of intersectional stigma in LAI-PrEP preferences among past-year PrEP-naive, HIV-negative US cisgender GBMSM.

Methods: The 2022 American Men's Internet Survey enrolled cisgender GBMSM online between October 2022 and October 2023. Using bivariate and multivariable adjusted Poisson regression with robust variance and a modified Intersectional Discrimination Index to examine associations between several forms of stigma-anticipated, day-to-day, social systems exclusion, and violence and harassment-and LAI-PrEP willingness and preference.

Results: Among participants (N = 1196), 705 (59.0%) were willing to use any PrEP modality and 393 (32.9%) were willing to use LAI-PrEP, among whom 211 (29.9%) reported a preference for LAI-PrEP. On average, participants experienced 1.8 of 7 anticipated discrimination items, 3.9 of 7 day-to-day discrimination items, 0.2 of 3 social systems exclusion items, and 0.9 of 4 violence/harassment items. Willingness to use LAI-PrEP was associated with anticipated stigma (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02 to 1.10; P < 0.01). Preference for LAI-PrEP was associated with anticipated stigma (aPR = 1.06; 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.12; P = 0.04), day-to-day (aPR = 1.09; 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.15; P = 0.01) stigma, and violence/harassment (aPR = 1.09; 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.18; p-0.03).

Conclusions: Given disproportionate HIV burden among GBMSM, a range of HIV PrEP modality options combined with efforts to address intersectional anticipated and enacted stigma among GBMSM is critical to ensure PrEP access, uptake, and adherence.

异性恋男同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者(GBMSM)长效注射PrEP (LAI-PrEP)意愿和偏好的交叉污名关联:一份简短的定量报告
背景:在美国,同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者(GBMSM)不成比例地受到艾滋病毒流行的影响。长效注射暴露前预防(LAI-PrEP)是一种新的艾滋病毒预防策略。然而,耻辱感仍然是艾滋病毒相关预防和护理的障碍。我们调查了在过去一年的PrEP naïve, hiv阴性的美国顺性GBMSM中交叉污名在LAI-PrEP偏好中的作用。方法:在2022年10月至2023年10月期间,进行了2022年美国男性互联网调查(AMIS),招募了顺性别GBMSM在线。使用双变量和多变量校正泊松回归稳健方差和修正的交叉歧视指数来检验几种形式的污名预期、日常生活、社会系统排斥、暴力和骚扰与lei - prep意愿和偏好之间的关系。结果:参与者(N=1196)中,有705人(59.0%)愿意使用任何PrEP方式,393人(32.9%)愿意使用LAI-PrEP,其中211人(29.9%)表示偏好使用LAI-PrEP。平均而言,参与者在7个预期歧视项目中经历了1.8个,在7个日常歧视项目中经历了3.9个,在3个社会系统排斥项目中经历了0.2个,在4个暴力/骚扰项目中经历了0.9个。结论:考虑到GBMSM中不成比例的HIV负担,一系列HIV PrEP模式选择结合努力解决GBMSM中交叉的预期和制定的耻辱感,对于确保PrEP的获取、接受和坚持至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书