Brief Report: Optimizing STI Prevention: Barriers, Behaviors, and Broader Impacts of Doxycycline Postexposure Prophylaxis (DoxyPEP).

Nicholas Eynon, Karan Prasad, Helen Bassett, Jordan Johnson, Riley Smith, Ariana Johnson, Susanne Doblecki-Lewis
{"title":"Brief Report: Optimizing STI Prevention: Barriers, Behaviors, and Broader Impacts of Doxycycline Postexposure Prophylaxis (DoxyPEP).","authors":"Nicholas Eynon, Karan Prasad, Helen Bassett, Jordan Johnson, Riley Smith, Ariana Johnson, Susanne Doblecki-Lewis","doi":"10.1097/QAI.0000000000003849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Doxycycline postexposure prophylaxis (DoxyPEP) is a novel strategy for preventing sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Although its clinical efficacy is established, less is known about its implementation, accessibility, and associated behavioral adaptations. This study evaluated these factors at the University of Miami Rapid Access Wellness clinic, which offers preexposure prophylaxis, non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis (nPEP), HIV care, and, since May 2023, DoxyPEP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From February to November 2024, clients at the Rapid Access Wellness Clinic were recruited to complete electronic surveys assessing DoxyPEP awareness, barriers, behaviors, and satisfaction. Survey responses were linked to medical records for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 135 participants (mean age 36 years), 77% identified as men, 16% as transgender, 69% as Hispanic/Latino, and 13% as Black/African American. The median number of sexual partners at intake was 5. DoxyPEP awareness was high (89%), with 77% actively using it. Most felt comfortable discussing DoxyPEP with doctors (92%), friends (60%), and sexual partners (55%). Cost was not a reported barrier for 68%. Nearly half (46%) reported behavioral changes because of DoxyPEP, including increased sexual partners (20%), reduced condom use (17%), and more anal sex (15%). More than half (55%) felt less concerned about STI exposure. Most (90%) were likely to discuss DoxyPEP with others, with 84% having already recommended it, primarily to friends (67%). In total, 94% planned to continue its use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DoxyPEP was widely accepted, accessible, and frequently promoted through peer networks, indicating a potential mechanism for broadening awareness of DoxyPEP among priority populations. Further study of associated behavioral changes may help optimize its role in STI prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":520658,"journal":{"name":"Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)","volume":" ","pages":"643-648"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000003849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Doxycycline postexposure prophylaxis (DoxyPEP) is a novel strategy for preventing sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Although its clinical efficacy is established, less is known about its implementation, accessibility, and associated behavioral adaptations. This study evaluated these factors at the University of Miami Rapid Access Wellness clinic, which offers preexposure prophylaxis, non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis (nPEP), HIV care, and, since May 2023, DoxyPEP.

Methods: From February to November 2024, clients at the Rapid Access Wellness Clinic were recruited to complete electronic surveys assessing DoxyPEP awareness, barriers, behaviors, and satisfaction. Survey responses were linked to medical records for analysis.

Results: Among 135 participants (mean age 36 years), 77% identified as men, 16% as transgender, 69% as Hispanic/Latino, and 13% as Black/African American. The median number of sexual partners at intake was 5. DoxyPEP awareness was high (89%), with 77% actively using it. Most felt comfortable discussing DoxyPEP with doctors (92%), friends (60%), and sexual partners (55%). Cost was not a reported barrier for 68%. Nearly half (46%) reported behavioral changes because of DoxyPEP, including increased sexual partners (20%), reduced condom use (17%), and more anal sex (15%). More than half (55%) felt less concerned about STI exposure. Most (90%) were likely to discuss DoxyPEP with others, with 84% having already recommended it, primarily to friends (67%). In total, 94% planned to continue its use.

Conclusions: DoxyPEP was widely accepted, accessible, and frequently promoted through peer networks, indicating a potential mechanism for broadening awareness of DoxyPEP among priority populations. Further study of associated behavioral changes may help optimize its role in STI prevention.

“优化性传播感染预防:多西环素暴露后预防(DoxyPEP)的障碍、行为和更广泛影响”。
背景:多西环素暴露后预防(DoxyPEP)是一种预防性传播感染(STIs)的新策略。虽然它的临床疗效是确定的,但对其实施,可及性和相关的行为适应知之甚少。本研究在迈阿密大学快速健康(RAW)诊所评估了这些因素,该诊所提供PrEP, nPEP,艾滋病毒护理,并自2023年5月起提供DoxyPEP。方法:从2024年2月至11月,招募RAW诊所的客户完成电子调查,评估DoxyPEP的认知、障碍、行为和满意度。调查结果与医疗记录相关联,以供分析。结果:135名参与者(平均年龄36岁)中,77%为男性,16%为变性人,69%为西班牙裔/拉丁裔,13%为黑人/非裔美国人。性伴侣的中位数是5。DoxyPEP认知度高(89%),77%积极使用。大多数人对与医生(92%)、朋友(60%)和性伴侣(55%)讨论DoxyPEP感到自在。68%的受访者认为成本不是障碍。近一半(46%)的人报告说,DoxyPEP使他们的行为发生了变化,包括性伴侣增加(20%),避孕套使用减少(17%),肛交增加(15%)。超过一半(55%)的人不太担心性传播感染。大多数人(90%)可能会与其他人讨论DoxyPEP, 84%的人已经推荐过它,主要是推荐给朋友(67%)。94%的人计划继续使用。结论:DoxyPEP被广泛接受、可及,并通过同伴网络频繁推广,提示在重点人群中提高DoxyPEP认知度的潜在机制。进一步研究相关的行为改变可能有助于优化其在性传播感染预防中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书