Integration of a patient-orientated eHealth intervention in the setting of an established enhanced recovery after surgery program can reduce complications and length of stay: an observational study.

IF 3.3 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
mHealth Pub Date : 2026-01-22 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.21037/mhealth-25-41
John Woodfield, Kari Clifford, Cole Melhopt, Charlotte Paddon, James Haddow, Susan Binks
{"title":"Integration of a patient-orientated eHealth intervention in the setting of an established enhanced recovery after surgery program can reduce complications and length of stay: an observational study.","authors":"John Woodfield, Kari Clifford, Cole Melhopt, Charlotte Paddon, James Haddow, Susan Binks","doi":"10.21037/mhealth-25-41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) significantly improves outcomes for colorectal surgery, but in publicly funded health services with resource constraints, some targets can be difficult to fully implement. eHealth interventions are increasingly used in surgery to improve outcomes. In 2020, we developed eHealth content to optimise prehabilitation, the delivery of an ERAS program, and postoperative care in a tertiary New Zealand hospital. Our objective was to summarise the clinical outcomes of implementing a patient-orientated eHealth intervention for patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery for neoplasia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes with propensity score matching for patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for neoplastic disease between January 2020 and May 2024. Those using eHealth were compared to patients receiving standard care. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from the Otago Clinical Audit (OCA) database and from the eHealth platform. Complications, length of hospital stay (LOS), and readmission were compared using intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 333 patients; 102 using eHealth and 231 receiving standard care. For matched ITT analysis, 102 patients from the standard care group were included. The eHealth group had a significantly shorter LOS [median of 5 <i>vs.</i> 6 days; relative risk (RR) =0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71, 0.88; P<0.001] and fewer total complications [27 <i>vs.</i> 51; odds ratio (OR) =0.60; 95% CI: 0.30, 1.22; P=0.03]. Readmissions were not significantly different between groups. The eHealth platform was well-liked, with 72% of interactions rated as \"very helpful\".</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient support through eHealth, with a focus on prehabilitation as well as postoperative recovery, can be used to effectively supplement ERAS pathways and improve clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":74181,"journal":{"name":"mHealth","volume":"12 ","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12885829/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mHealth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-25-41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) significantly improves outcomes for colorectal surgery, but in publicly funded health services with resource constraints, some targets can be difficult to fully implement. eHealth interventions are increasingly used in surgery to improve outcomes. In 2020, we developed eHealth content to optimise prehabilitation, the delivery of an ERAS program, and postoperative care in a tertiary New Zealand hospital. Our objective was to summarise the clinical outcomes of implementing a patient-orientated eHealth intervention for patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery for neoplasia.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes with propensity score matching for patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for neoplastic disease between January 2020 and May 2024. Those using eHealth were compared to patients receiving standard care. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from the Otago Clinical Audit (OCA) database and from the eHealth platform. Complications, length of hospital stay (LOS), and readmission were compared using intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses.

Results: We identified 333 patients; 102 using eHealth and 231 receiving standard care. For matched ITT analysis, 102 patients from the standard care group were included. The eHealth group had a significantly shorter LOS [median of 5 vs. 6 days; relative risk (RR) =0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71, 0.88; P<0.001] and fewer total complications [27 vs. 51; odds ratio (OR) =0.60; 95% CI: 0.30, 1.22; P=0.03]. Readmissions were not significantly different between groups. The eHealth platform was well-liked, with 72% of interactions rated as "very helpful".

Conclusions: Patient support through eHealth, with a focus on prehabilitation as well as postoperative recovery, can be used to effectively supplement ERAS pathways and improve clinical outcomes.

一项观察性研究:将以患者为导向的电子健康干预整合到已建立的增强术后恢复计划中,可以减少并发症和住院时间。
背景:增强术后恢复(ERAS)可显著改善结直肠手术的预后,但在资源有限的公共资助卫生服务中,一些目标可能难以完全实现。电子健康干预越来越多地用于外科手术,以改善结果。2020年,我们开发了电子健康内容,以优化新西兰一家三级医院的康复、ERAS项目的交付和术后护理。我们的目的是总结在择期结直肠肿瘤手术患者中实施以患者为导向的电子健康干预的临床结果。方法:我们对2020年1月至2024年5月期间接受选择性结直肠切除术的肿瘤疾病患者的临床结果进行回顾性分析,并进行倾向评分匹配。使用电子医疗的患者与接受标准治疗的患者进行比较。人口统计和临床数据从奥塔哥临床审计(OCA)数据库和电子健康平台中提取。使用意向治疗(ITT)和方案分析(PP)对并发症、住院时间(LOS)和再入院进行比较。结果:我们确定了333例患者;102人使用电子保健,231人接受标准护理。对于匹配的ITT分析,来自标准治疗组的102例患者被纳入。eHealth组的LOS显著缩短[中位数为5天vs. 6天;相对危险度(RR) =0.79;95%置信区间(CI): 0.71, 0.88;pv。51;优势比(OR) =0.60;95% ci: 0.30, 1.22;P = 0.03)。两组再入院率无显著差异。电子健康平台很受欢迎,72%的互动被评为“非常有帮助”。结论:通过eHealth对患者的支持,重点是康复和术后恢复,可以有效地补充ERAS途径并改善临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书