Use of the GTT@home Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Kit in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Performance Evaluation Study.

IF 2.9 Q2 Medicine
JMIR Diabetes Pub Date : 2026-02-11 DOI:10.2196/69695
Gareth J Dunseath, Stephen D Luzio, Wai Yee Cheung, Sharon N Parsons, Nicola John, Mahmoud Chokor, Michael Atkinson, Rajesh Peter
{"title":"Use of the GTT@home Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Kit in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Performance Evaluation Study.","authors":"Gareth J Dunseath, Stephen D Luzio, Wai Yee Cheung, Sharon N Parsons, Nicola John, Mahmoud Chokor, Michael Atkinson, Rajesh Peter","doi":"10.2196/69695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) remains the optimal diagnostic test for use in pregnancy but needs to be performed in the clinical setting. The GTT@home OGTT device offers the potential to enable patients to perform the test at home using capillary blood samples.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine the accuracy of the GTT@home device compared to the routine National Health Service laboratory reference method using blood samples during an OGTT from pregnant women at high risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 65 women (aged >18 y), at high risk for GDM (per the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines) were recruited for this performance evaluation. Following an overnight fast, participants went for a 75-g OGTT. Fasting and 2-hour capillary glucose levels were measured using the GTT@home device with corresponding venous samples measured in the laboratory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The complete data for analysis was available for 61/65 devices. The overall bias for the GTT@home device was +0.16 mmol/L. Correlation analysis of the clinical performance of the two methods using a surveillance error grid showed 79.8% of results in the lowest, 16.9% in the \"slight, lower\" and 2.4% in the \"slight, higher\" risk categories. Only 0.8% were \"moderate, lower\" risk, and none were in any higher risk categories. There was agreement in the classification in 54/61 cases. The GTT@home device under-classified 2 cases and over-classified 5 cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The GTT@home device worked well in a controlled, antenatal clinical setting. Differences in classification observed were generally due to small differences in glucose values close to the diagnostic cut-offs. The GTT@home device shows promise for home testing of glucose tolerance in pregnant women.</p>","PeriodicalId":52371,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Diabetes","volume":"11 ","pages":"e69695"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12893706/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/69695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) remains the optimal diagnostic test for use in pregnancy but needs to be performed in the clinical setting. The GTT@home OGTT device offers the potential to enable patients to perform the test at home using capillary blood samples.

Objective: This study aimed to determine the accuracy of the GTT@home device compared to the routine National Health Service laboratory reference method using blood samples during an OGTT from pregnant women at high risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

Methods: A total of 65 women (aged >18 y), at high risk for GDM (per the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines) were recruited for this performance evaluation. Following an overnight fast, participants went for a 75-g OGTT. Fasting and 2-hour capillary glucose levels were measured using the GTT@home device with corresponding venous samples measured in the laboratory.

Results: The complete data for analysis was available for 61/65 devices. The overall bias for the GTT@home device was +0.16 mmol/L. Correlation analysis of the clinical performance of the two methods using a surveillance error grid showed 79.8% of results in the lowest, 16.9% in the "slight, lower" and 2.4% in the "slight, higher" risk categories. Only 0.8% were "moderate, lower" risk, and none were in any higher risk categories. There was agreement in the classification in 54/61 cases. The GTT@home device under-classified 2 cases and over-classified 5 cases.

Conclusions: The GTT@home device worked well in a controlled, antenatal clinical setting. Differences in classification observed were generally due to small differences in glucose values close to the diagnostic cut-offs. The GTT@home device shows promise for home testing of glucose tolerance in pregnant women.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

GTT@home口服糖耐量试验试剂盒在妊娠糖尿病中的应用:性能评价研究。
背景:75克口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)仍然是妊娠诊断的最佳试验,但需要在临床环境中进行。GTT@home OGTT设备提供了一种可能性,使患者能够在家中使用毛细血管血液样本进行测试。目的:本研究旨在利用妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)高危孕妇OGTT期间的血液样本,确定GTT@home装置与常规国家卫生服务实验室参考方法的准确性。方法:共招募65名GDM高风险女性(年龄在bb0 - 18岁)(根据国家健康与护理卓越研究所指南)进行绩效评估。在禁食一夜之后,参与者进行75克的OGTT。使用GTT@home装置测量空腹和2小时毛细血管血糖水平,并在实验室测量相应的静脉样本。结果:61/65台设备有完整的分析数据。GTT@home装置的总体偏倚为+0.16 mmol/L。采用监测误差网格对两种方法的临床表现进行相关性分析,结果显示,最低风险类别占79.8%,“轻微、较低”风险类别占16.9%,“轻微、较高”风险类别占2.4%。只有0.8%的人属于“中等、较低”风险,没有人属于任何高风险类别。61例中有54例的分类一致。GTT@home装置低分类2例,高分类5例。结论:GTT@home装置在控制的产前临床环境中效果良好。观察到的分类差异通常是由于接近诊断截止值的葡萄糖值的微小差异。GTT@home设备有望用于孕妇葡萄糖耐量的家庭测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Diabetes
JMIR Diabetes Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书