HALP score as an independent prognostic biomarker for recurrence and progression in non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A retrospective cohort study

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Surgical Oncology-Oxford Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.suronc.2026.102357
Adem Utlu, Tugay Aksakallı, Feyzullah Çelik, Ahmet Emre Cinislioğlu, Mehmet Sefa Altay, Fevzi Bedir, Hüseyin Kocatürk, İbrahim Karabulut
{"title":"HALP score as an independent prognostic biomarker for recurrence and progression in non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Adem Utlu,&nbsp;Tugay Aksakallı,&nbsp;Feyzullah Çelik,&nbsp;Ahmet Emre Cinislioğlu,&nbsp;Mehmet Sefa Altay,&nbsp;Fevzi Bedir,&nbsp;Hüseyin Kocatürk,&nbsp;İbrahim Karabulut","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2026.102357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic utility of the HALP (Hemoglobin-Albumin-Lymphocyte-Platelet) score in predicting tumor recurrence in patients with non-metastatic bladder cancer (NMIBC) without muscle invasion.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted involving 428 NMIBC patients followed for at least five years. HALP scores were calculated using preoperative hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet measurements. Tumor recurrence was defined as the appearance of new lesions during follow-up, while muscle invasion was classified as progression. Determinants of recurrence were investigated using multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. The discriminative performance of the HALP score was evaluated using ROC analysis, and recurrence-free survival was compared according to the median HALP threshold using Kaplan-Meier methodology.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean HALP score was significantly higher in patients without recurrence compared to those with recurrence (5.9 ± 1.3 vs. 4.6 ± 1.4; p &lt; 0.001). HALP score, along with tumor size and grade, remained an independent predictor of recurrence in multivariate analyses (HR ≈ 0.825; p &lt; 0.001). ROC analysis showed acceptable discrimination, and Kaplan-Meier curves showed significantly shorter recurrence-free survival in patients with lower HALP scores (log-rank p &lt; 0.005). Additionally, HALP values were significantly lower in patients with progression compared to those without (p = 0.006).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>HALP score is a simple, cost-effective biomarker reflecting immune nutrition status and is significantly associated with recurrence and progression in NMIBC. Inclusion of HALP in risk stratification models can improve individualized follow-up strategies and clinical decision-making processes in patients with non-invasive bladder cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Structured abstract</h3><div>Recurrence and progression remain major clinical challenges in non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), highlighting the need for reliable and cost-effective prognostic biomarkers. This retrospective cohort study included 428 patients with NMIBC who were followed for at least five years to evaluate the prognostic value of the hemoglobin–albumin–lymphocyte–platelet (HALP) score. The HALP score was calculated using preoperative laboratory parameters, and recurrence and progression were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards models, receiver operating characteristic analysis, and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Patients with recurrence exhibited significantly lower HALP scores compared with those without recurrence, and the HALP score remained an independent predictor of recurrence in multivariable analyses (HR ≈ 0.83; p &lt; 0.001). ROC analysis demonstrated acceptable discriminatory performance (AUC = 0.78), while Kaplan–Meier analysis showed significantly shorter recurrence-free survival in patients with low HALP scores. Additionally, HALP values were significantly lower in patients who developed disease progression. These findings suggest that the HALP score is a simple, inexpensive, and independent prognostic biomarker that may enhance risk stratification and support personalized surveillance strategies in patients with NMIBC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 102357"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960740426000083","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic utility of the HALP (Hemoglobin-Albumin-Lymphocyte-Platelet) score in predicting tumor recurrence in patients with non-metastatic bladder cancer (NMIBC) without muscle invasion.

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted involving 428 NMIBC patients followed for at least five years. HALP scores were calculated using preoperative hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet measurements. Tumor recurrence was defined as the appearance of new lesions during follow-up, while muscle invasion was classified as progression. Determinants of recurrence were investigated using multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. The discriminative performance of the HALP score was evaluated using ROC analysis, and recurrence-free survival was compared according to the median HALP threshold using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

Results

The mean HALP score was significantly higher in patients without recurrence compared to those with recurrence (5.9 ± 1.3 vs. 4.6 ± 1.4; p < 0.001). HALP score, along with tumor size and grade, remained an independent predictor of recurrence in multivariate analyses (HR ≈ 0.825; p < 0.001). ROC analysis showed acceptable discrimination, and Kaplan-Meier curves showed significantly shorter recurrence-free survival in patients with lower HALP scores (log-rank p < 0.005). Additionally, HALP values were significantly lower in patients with progression compared to those without (p = 0.006).

Conclusion

HALP score is a simple, cost-effective biomarker reflecting immune nutrition status and is significantly associated with recurrence and progression in NMIBC. Inclusion of HALP in risk stratification models can improve individualized follow-up strategies and clinical decision-making processes in patients with non-invasive bladder cancer.

Structured abstract

Recurrence and progression remain major clinical challenges in non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), highlighting the need for reliable and cost-effective prognostic biomarkers. This retrospective cohort study included 428 patients with NMIBC who were followed for at least five years to evaluate the prognostic value of the hemoglobin–albumin–lymphocyte–platelet (HALP) score. The HALP score was calculated using preoperative laboratory parameters, and recurrence and progression were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards models, receiver operating characteristic analysis, and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Patients with recurrence exhibited significantly lower HALP scores compared with those without recurrence, and the HALP score remained an independent predictor of recurrence in multivariable analyses (HR ≈ 0.83; p < 0.001). ROC analysis demonstrated acceptable discriminatory performance (AUC = 0.78), while Kaplan–Meier analysis showed significantly shorter recurrence-free survival in patients with low HALP scores. Additionally, HALP values were significantly lower in patients who developed disease progression. These findings suggest that the HALP score is a simple, inexpensive, and independent prognostic biomarker that may enhance risk stratification and support personalized surveillance strategies in patients with NMIBC.

Abstract Image

HALP评分作为非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌复发和进展的独立预后生物标志物:一项回顾性队列研究
目的:本研究旨在评估HALP(血红蛋白-白蛋白-淋巴细胞-血小板)评分在预测无肌肉侵袭的非转移性膀胱癌(NMIBC)患者肿瘤复发中的预后效用。方法:对428例NMIBC患者进行回顾性队列分析,随访时间至少为5年。通过术前血红蛋白、白蛋白、淋巴细胞和血小板测量来计算HALP评分。肿瘤复发被定义为随访期间出现新的病变,而肌肉侵犯被归类为进展。使用多变量logistic回归和Cox比例风险模型研究复发的决定因素。采用ROC分析评估HALP评分的判别性能,采用Kaplan-Meier方法根据HALP阈值中位数比较无复发生存率。结果:无复发患者的平均HALP评分明显高于复发患者(5.9±1.3比4.6±1.4);结论:HALP评分是一种简单、经济有效的反映免疫营养状况的生物标志物,与NMIBC的复发和进展显著相关。将HALP纳入风险分层模型可以改善非侵袭性膀胱癌患者的个体化随访策略和临床决策过程。结构化摘要:复发和进展仍然是非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)的主要临床挑战,突出了对可靠和具有成本效益的预后生物标志物的需求。这项回顾性队列研究纳入了428例NMIBC患者,随访至少5年,以评估血红蛋白-白蛋白-淋巴细胞-血小板(HALP)评分的预后价值。采用术前实验室参数计算HALP评分,采用多变量logistic回归、Cox比例风险模型、受试者工作特征分析和Kaplan-Meier生存分析分析复发和进展情况。复发患者的HALP评分明显低于无复发患者,在多变量分析中,HALP评分仍然是复发的独立预测因子(HR≈0.83;p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical Oncology-Oxford
Surgical Oncology-Oxford 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
169
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Surgical Oncology is a peer reviewed journal publishing review articles that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in surgical oncology and related fields of interest. Articles represent a spectrum of current technology in oncology research as well as those concerning clinical trials, surgical technique, methods of investigation and patient evaluation. Surgical Oncology publishes comprehensive Reviews that examine individual topics in considerable detail, in addition to editorials and commentaries which focus on selected papers. The journal also publishes special issues which explore topics of interest to surgical oncologists in great detail - outlining recent advancements and providing readers with the most up to date information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书