Comparative effects of overground and treadmill gait training on post-stroke quality of life and walking performance.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-12 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2026.2627991
Mashael A Al-Homayin, Matar A Alzahrani
{"title":"Comparative effects of overground and treadmill gait training on post-stroke quality of life and walking performance.","authors":"Mashael A Al-Homayin, Matar A Alzahrani","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2026.2627991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-stroke gait impairment significantly affects patients' functional independence and quality of life (QoL). Gait training strategies such as overground and treadmill-based interventions are frequently employed in stroke rehabilitation, yet the comparative effectiveness of these modalities remains inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effects of overground (OGT) and treadmill (TGT) gait training on post-stroke QoL and walking performance over a 4-week intervention period comprising 12 training sessions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An experimental pre-post intervention design was employed, involving 17 stroke survivors (<i>n</i> = 7 over ground, <i>n</i> = 10 on a treadmill). Participants underwent structured gait training and were assessed using the WHOQOL-BREF, walking speed (m/s), and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) for walking capacity. A multivariate repeated measures ANOVA examined effects of time, group, and interaction on QoL domains and performance metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant within-group improvement was observed in overall QoL (Wilks' Λ = 0.501, F (1, 15) = 14.94, <i>p</i> = .002, partial η<sup>2</sup> = 0.499), irrespective of training modality, with no significant between-group differences (<i>p</i> = .712). Walking capacity demonstrated a statistically significant increase among all participants (F (1, 15) = 10.66, <i>p</i> = .005, partial η<sup>2</sup> = 0.415), with no significant between-group difference (<i>p</i> = .668). In contrast, changes in walking speed were not statistically significant (F (1, 15) = 1.96, <i>p</i> = .182), and no significant difference was observed between the OGT and TGT groups (<i>p</i> = .269).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both OGT and TGT significantly improved QoL and walking capacity among stroke survivors, with no superior effect observed between modalities. However, neither intervention significantly enhanced walking speed. These findings suggest that both training approaches are equally beneficial in improving endurance and overall well-being post-stroke, though additional strategies may be needed to target gait speed.77.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1203-1214"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2026.2627991","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Post-stroke gait impairment significantly affects patients' functional independence and quality of life (QoL). Gait training strategies such as overground and treadmill-based interventions are frequently employed in stroke rehabilitation, yet the comparative effectiveness of these modalities remains inconclusive.

Objective: To compare the effects of overground (OGT) and treadmill (TGT) gait training on post-stroke QoL and walking performance over a 4-week intervention period comprising 12 training sessions.

Methods: An experimental pre-post intervention design was employed, involving 17 stroke survivors (n = 7 over ground, n = 10 on a treadmill). Participants underwent structured gait training and were assessed using the WHOQOL-BREF, walking speed (m/s), and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) for walking capacity. A multivariate repeated measures ANOVA examined effects of time, group, and interaction on QoL domains and performance metrics.

Results: Significant within-group improvement was observed in overall QoL (Wilks' Λ = 0.501, F (1, 15) = 14.94, p = .002, partial η2 = 0.499), irrespective of training modality, with no significant between-group differences (p = .712). Walking capacity demonstrated a statistically significant increase among all participants (F (1, 15) = 10.66, p = .005, partial η2 = 0.415), with no significant between-group difference (p = .668). In contrast, changes in walking speed were not statistically significant (F (1, 15) = 1.96, p = .182), and no significant difference was observed between the OGT and TGT groups (p = .269).

Conclusion: Both OGT and TGT significantly improved QoL and walking capacity among stroke survivors, with no superior effect observed between modalities. However, neither intervention significantly enhanced walking speed. These findings suggest that both training approaches are equally beneficial in improving endurance and overall well-being post-stroke, though additional strategies may be needed to target gait speed.77.

地面和跑步机步态训练对中风后生活质量和步行表现的比较影响。
背景:脑卒中后步态障碍显著影响患者的功能独立性和生活质量。步态训练策略,如地面和跑步机为基础的干预经常用于中风康复,但这些模式的比较有效性仍然没有定论。目的:比较地上(OGT)和跑步机(TGT)步态训练对中风后生活质量和步行表现的影响,为期4周,包括12个训练阶段。方法:采用实验性干预前-干预后设计,纳入17例中风幸存者(n = 7在地面上,n = 10在跑步机上)。参与者接受结构化的步态训练,并使用WHOQOL-BREF、步行速度(m/s)和6分钟步行测试(6MWT)评估步行能力。多变量重复测量方差分析检查了时间、组和相互作用对生活质量域和性能指标的影响。结果:组内整体生活质量显著改善(Wilks' Λ = 0.501, F (1,15) = 14.94, p =。002,偏η值2 = 0.499),与训练方式无关,组间无显著差异(p = .712)。所有参与者的步行能力均有统计学意义上的显著提高(F (1,15) = 10.66, p =。005,偏η2 = 0.415),组间差异无统计学意义(p = .668)。相比之下,步行速度变化无统计学意义(F (1,15) = 1.96, p =。OGT组与TGT组间无显著差异(p = 0.269)。结论:OGT和TGT均可显著改善脑卒中幸存者的生活质量和行走能力,两种治疗方式间无明显差异。然而,两种干预措施都没有显著提高步行速度。这些发现表明,这两种训练方法在提高中风后的耐力和整体健康方面同样有益,尽管可能需要额外的策略来瞄准步态速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书