Strength Training Versus Walking on the Fibromyalgia Impact: A Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial.

IF 1.5 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
André Pontes-Silva, Almir Vieira Dibai-Filho, Thayná Soares de Melo, Leticia Menegalli-Santos, Josimari Melo DeSantana, Marcelo Cardoso de Souza, Mariana Arias Avila
{"title":"Strength Training Versus Walking on the Fibromyalgia Impact: A Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial.","authors":"André Pontes-Silva, Almir Vieira Dibai-Filho, Thayná Soares de Melo, Leticia Menegalli-Santos, Josimari Melo DeSantana, Marcelo Cardoso de Souza, Mariana Arias Avila","doi":"10.1002/msc.70186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effect of 24 sessions of progressive intensity strength training on the impact of fibromyalgia (primary outcome). Furthermore, we evaluated its effects on sleep, anxiety, depression, wind-up mechanism, conditioned pain modulation, cutaneous sensory threshold, musculoskeletal performance, walking ability, perceived improvement, and treatment adherence (secondary outcomes).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A blinded randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>After blinded outcome assessments, 66 people were randomised and concealed and allocated to progressive (n = 22), constant (n = 22), or walking (n = 22) strength training groups.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>People with fibromyalgia.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>In the progressive group, exercise intensity increased by 20% of maximum strength each month: 50% in the first month, 70% in the second month, and 90% in the third month. In the constant or walking exercise groups, moderate intensity was maintained at the end of the treatment. Each person received 24 individual exercise sessions (2x/week), with three months of exercise and three months of no exercise.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Fibromyalgia impact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Groups were similar at baseline. There were no significant between-group differences in the primary outcome at any time point. In within-group comparisons, we observed significant differences indicating that all three types of exercise reduced fibromyalgia symptoms; however, no variable achieved a minimal clinically important difference. In between-group comparisons for the secondary outcomes, groups reported a positive perception of improvement, but most of each group did not adhere to treatment and/or did not answer about adherence after follow-up without exercise.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Twenty-four sessions of progressive intensity strength training did not provide a greater reduction in the fibromyalgia impact than constant intensity or walking exercises.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC): RBR-9pbq9fg, date of registration: October 06, 2022.</p><p><strong>Protocol publication: </strong>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders: Doi - 10.1186/s12891-023-06952-3 | Published: Volume 24, article number 816, October 14, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":46945,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Care","volume":"23 4","pages":"e70186"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12894804/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effect of 24 sessions of progressive intensity strength training on the impact of fibromyalgia (primary outcome). Furthermore, we evaluated its effects on sleep, anxiety, depression, wind-up mechanism, conditioned pain modulation, cutaneous sensory threshold, musculoskeletal performance, walking ability, perceived improvement, and treatment adherence (secondary outcomes).

Design: A blinded randomised controlled trial.

Setting: After blinded outcome assessments, 66 people were randomised and concealed and allocated to progressive (n = 22), constant (n = 22), or walking (n = 22) strength training groups.

Participants: People with fibromyalgia.

Interventions: In the progressive group, exercise intensity increased by 20% of maximum strength each month: 50% in the first month, 70% in the second month, and 90% in the third month. In the constant or walking exercise groups, moderate intensity was maintained at the end of the treatment. Each person received 24 individual exercise sessions (2x/week), with three months of exercise and three months of no exercise.

Main outcome measure: Fibromyalgia impact.

Results: Groups were similar at baseline. There were no significant between-group differences in the primary outcome at any time point. In within-group comparisons, we observed significant differences indicating that all three types of exercise reduced fibromyalgia symptoms; however, no variable achieved a minimal clinically important difference. In between-group comparisons for the secondary outcomes, groups reported a positive perception of improvement, but most of each group did not adhere to treatment and/or did not answer about adherence after follow-up without exercise.

Conclusions: Twenty-four sessions of progressive intensity strength training did not provide a greater reduction in the fibromyalgia impact than constant intensity or walking exercises.

Trial registration: Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC): RBR-9pbq9fg, date of registration: October 06, 2022.

Protocol publication: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders: Doi - 10.1186/s12891-023-06952-3 | Published: Volume 24, article number 816, October 14, 2023.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

力量训练与步行对纤维肌痛的影响:一项盲法随机对照试验。
目的:比较24次进行性强度力量训练对纤维肌痛的影响(主要结局)。此外,我们评估了其对睡眠、焦虑、抑郁、上弦机制、条件疼痛调节、皮肤感觉阈值、肌肉骨骼表现、行走能力、感知改善和治疗依从性(次要结局)的影响。设计:盲法随机对照试验。环境:经过盲法结果评估,66人被随机分组并隐藏,并被分配到渐进(n = 22)、恒定(n = 22)或步行(n = 22)力量训练组。参与者:纤维肌痛患者。干预措施:在进步组,运动强度每月增加最大强度的20%:第一个月增加50%,第二个月增加70%,第三个月增加90%。在持续或步行运动组中,在治疗结束时保持中等强度。每个人接受24次单独的锻炼(2次/周),三个月的锻炼和三个月的不锻炼。主要结局指标:纤维肌痛的影响。结果:各组在基线时相似。在任何时间点,组间主要结局均无显著差异。在组内比较中,我们观察到显著差异,表明所有三种类型的运动都能减轻纤维肌痛症状;然而,没有一个变量达到最小的临床重要差异。在次要结果的组间比较中,各组报告了积极的改善感觉,但每个组的大多数人都没有坚持治疗和/或在没有运动的随访后没有回答依从性。结论:24次渐进式强度力量训练并没有比恒定强度或步行运动更能减少纤维肌痛的影响。试验注册:巴西临床试验注册中心(ReBEC): RBR-9pbq9fg,注册日期:2022年10月6日。协议出版:BMC肌肉骨骼疾病:Doi - 10.1186/s12891-023-06952-3 |出版:第24卷,文章编号816,2023年10月14日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Care
Musculoskeletal Care RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Care is a peer-reviewed journal for all health professionals committed to the clinical delivery of high quality care for people with musculoskeletal conditions and providing knowledge to support decision making by professionals, patients and policy makers. This journal publishes papers on original research, applied research, review articles and clinical guidelines. Regular topics include patient education, psychological and social impact, patient experiences of health care, clinical up dates and the effectiveness of therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书