The Professional Clinical Ethicist: Situated Expertise and the Post-Guild Profession.

IF 1.6 4区 哲学 Q3 ETHICS
Margie Hodges Shaw
{"title":"The Professional Clinical Ethicist: Situated Expertise and the Post-Guild Profession.","authors":"Margie Hodges Shaw","doi":"10.1007/s10730-026-09579-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The concept of a “profession” carries both historical significance and ongoing controversy. Skeptics argue that the term “profession” often functions less as a marker of competence of specialized knowledge and commitment to service than as a tool of gatekeeping, conformity, and power. Professions were historically anchored in what was considered disciplinary authority; in contrast, clinical ethics has emerged through a more practice-based, interdisciplinary model rooted in moral discernment and contextual judgment. Consequently, some recognize clinical ethics, a field situated at the intersection of bioethics and healthcare, as a profession while others question that designation. Currently, clinical ethics remains in a gray area among regulated health professions. This paper examines the historical evolution of professional status and evaluates the competencies and role of clinical ethics within that historical framework. By analyzing current credentialing practices and emerging accreditation efforts, this paper considers how the field of clinical ethics might critically and constructively move toward formal professional identity and recognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":46160,"journal":{"name":"Hec Forum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hec Forum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-026-09579-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of a “profession” carries both historical significance and ongoing controversy. Skeptics argue that the term “profession” often functions less as a marker of competence of specialized knowledge and commitment to service than as a tool of gatekeeping, conformity, and power. Professions were historically anchored in what was considered disciplinary authority; in contrast, clinical ethics has emerged through a more practice-based, interdisciplinary model rooted in moral discernment and contextual judgment. Consequently, some recognize clinical ethics, a field situated at the intersection of bioethics and healthcare, as a profession while others question that designation. Currently, clinical ethics remains in a gray area among regulated health professions. This paper examines the historical evolution of professional status and evaluates the competencies and role of clinical ethics within that historical framework. By analyzing current credentialing practices and emerging accreditation efforts, this paper considers how the field of clinical ethics might critically and constructively move toward formal professional identity and recognition.

专业临床伦理学家:情境专业知识和后公会职业。
“专业”的概念既具有历史意义,也具有持续的争议。持怀疑态度的人认为,“职业”一词往往不是作为专业知识能力和服务承诺的标志,而是作为看门人、顺从和权力的工具。从历史上看,职业是建立在被认为是纪律权威的基础上的;相比之下,临床伦理学是通过一种基于实践的、跨学科的模式出现的,这种模式植根于道德辨别力和语境判断。因此,一些人承认临床伦理学是一种职业,这是一个位于生物伦理学和医疗保健交叉点的领域,而另一些人则质疑这一称号。目前,临床伦理在受监管的卫生专业中仍处于灰色地带。本文考察了专业地位的历史演变,并在该历史框架内评估了临床伦理学的能力和作用。通过分析当前的认证实践和新兴的认证工作,本文考虑了临床伦理学领域如何批判性和建设性地走向正式的职业身份和认可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hec Forum
Hec Forum ETHICS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: HEC Forum is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to practicing physicians, nurses, social workers, risk managers, attorneys, ethicists, and other HEC committee members. Contributions are welcomed from any pertinent source, but the text should be written to be appreciated by HEC members and lay readers. HEC Forum publishes essays, research papers, and features the following sections:Essays on Substantive Bioethical/Health Law Issues Analyses of Procedural or Operational Committee Issues Document Exchange Special Articles International Perspectives Mt./St. Anonymous: Cases and Institutional Policies Point/Counterpoint Argumentation Case Reviews, Analyses, and Resolutions Chairperson''s Section `Tough Spot'' Critical Annotations Health Law Alert Network News Letters to the Editors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书