{"title":"The Professional Clinical Ethicist: Situated Expertise and the Post-Guild Profession.","authors":"Margie Hodges Shaw","doi":"10.1007/s10730-026-09579-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The concept of a “profession” carries both historical significance and ongoing controversy. Skeptics argue that the term “profession” often functions less as a marker of competence of specialized knowledge and commitment to service than as a tool of gatekeeping, conformity, and power. Professions were historically anchored in what was considered disciplinary authority; in contrast, clinical ethics has emerged through a more practice-based, interdisciplinary model rooted in moral discernment and contextual judgment. Consequently, some recognize clinical ethics, a field situated at the intersection of bioethics and healthcare, as a profession while others question that designation. Currently, clinical ethics remains in a gray area among regulated health professions. This paper examines the historical evolution of professional status and evaluates the competencies and role of clinical ethics within that historical framework. By analyzing current credentialing practices and emerging accreditation efforts, this paper considers how the field of clinical ethics might critically and constructively move toward formal professional identity and recognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":46160,"journal":{"name":"Hec Forum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hec Forum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-026-09579-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The concept of a “profession” carries both historical significance and ongoing controversy. Skeptics argue that the term “profession” often functions less as a marker of competence of specialized knowledge and commitment to service than as a tool of gatekeeping, conformity, and power. Professions were historically anchored in what was considered disciplinary authority; in contrast, clinical ethics has emerged through a more practice-based, interdisciplinary model rooted in moral discernment and contextual judgment. Consequently, some recognize clinical ethics, a field situated at the intersection of bioethics and healthcare, as a profession while others question that designation. Currently, clinical ethics remains in a gray area among regulated health professions. This paper examines the historical evolution of professional status and evaluates the competencies and role of clinical ethics within that historical framework. By analyzing current credentialing practices and emerging accreditation efforts, this paper considers how the field of clinical ethics might critically and constructively move toward formal professional identity and recognition.
期刊介绍:
HEC Forum is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to practicing physicians, nurses, social workers, risk managers, attorneys, ethicists, and other HEC committee members. Contributions are welcomed from any pertinent source, but the text should be written to be appreciated by HEC members and lay readers. HEC Forum publishes essays, research papers, and features the following sections:Essays on Substantive Bioethical/Health Law Issues Analyses of Procedural or Operational Committee Issues Document Exchange Special Articles International Perspectives Mt./St. Anonymous: Cases and Institutional Policies Point/Counterpoint Argumentation Case Reviews, Analyses, and Resolutions Chairperson''s Section `Tough Spot'' Critical Annotations Health Law Alert Network News Letters to the Editors