Comment on: Three Versus Two-Rows Circular Stapler in Colorectal Anastomosis: Short Term Outcomes.

IF 2.2 4区医学 Q3 SURGERY

Surgical Innovation Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-11 DOI:10.1177/15533506261425317

Jeremy Meyer

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This letter comments on a recent study comparing two-row and three-row circular staplers in colorectal cancer surgery. We highlight methodological limitations related to the use of historical controls, evolving perioperative practices, and limited event numbers, which may confound the observed reduction in anastomotic leakage. Current evidence does not conclusively support the superiority of triple-row staplers, underscoring the need for prospective studies using standardized modern protocols.

查看原文本刊更多论文

三排与两排环形吻合器在结直肠吻合术中的近期疗效。

这封信评论了最近的一项研究，比较了两排和三排圆形订书机在结直肠癌手术中的应用。我们强调了与使用历史对照、不断发展的围手术期实践和有限的事件数相关的方法学局限性，这些局限性可能会混淆观察到的吻合口瘘减少。目前的证据并不能决定性地支持三排订书机的优越性，这强调了使用标准化现代方案进行前瞻性研究的必要性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Surgical Innovation 医学-外科

CiteScore

2.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).