Navigating Ethical Challenges in CAR-T Treatment.

IF 1.6 4区 哲学 Q3 ETHICS
Hec Forum Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-12 DOI:10.1007/s10730-025-09574-5
Elise R A Pennings, Anne M Spanjaart, Anne Ruth Schaaphok, Marjolein A van Maanen, Sanne H Tonino, Maria T Kuipers, Marie José Kersten, Suzanne Metselaar
{"title":"Navigating Ethical Challenges in CAR-T Treatment.","authors":"Elise R A Pennings, Anne M Spanjaart, Anne Ruth Schaaphok, Marjolein A van Maanen, Sanne H Tonino, Maria T Kuipers, Marie José Kersten, Suzanne Metselaar","doi":"10.1007/s10730-025-09574-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46160,"journal":{"name":"Hec Forum","volume":" ","pages":"315-332"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13401562/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hec Forum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-025-09574-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
CAR-T治疗中的伦理挑战
嵌合抗原受体t细胞(CAR-T)疗法前所未有地改善了复发或难治性b细胞恶性肿瘤患者的预后,为预后不良的患者提供了生存前景。尽管取得了这些进步,CAR-T疗法仍面临着多重挑战,因为它并不总是有效的,可能有害,有严重的、可能危及生命的副作用,需要资源,而且价格昂贵。此外,患者的选择和优先排序(例如,在医院或制造能力有限的情况下)是复杂的,因为没有标准化的标准存在,并且仍在开发可靠的预测工具来预先确定个人结果。这给医疗保健专业人员带来了道德上的挑战,为了给病人提供良好的护理,他们需要应对这些挑战,这可能是道德困境的一个原因,可能会影响他们的健康。因此,解决这些道德挑战对患者和医疗保健专业人员都至关重要。然而,到目前为止,它们几乎没有在CAR-T治疗的背景下进行探索。因此,我们将根据我们作为临床医生和临床伦理学家的经验,对目前CAR-T治疗在临床实践中的伦理挑战进行初步概述。此外,我们将讨论如何在临床实践中应对这些挑战,提出临床伦理支持,特别是通过道德案例审议。随着CAR-T疗法应用的增加,预计更多的医疗保健专业人员将遇到道德挑战,这需要充分的支持,以提高患者护理质量,同时也有助于医疗保健专业人员的福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hec Forum
Hec Forum ETHICS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: HEC Forum is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to practicing physicians, nurses, social workers, risk managers, attorneys, ethicists, and other HEC committee members. Contributions are welcomed from any pertinent source, but the text should be written to be appreciated by HEC members and lay readers. HEC Forum publishes essays, research papers, and features the following sections:Essays on Substantive Bioethical/Health Law Issues Analyses of Procedural or Operational Committee Issues Document Exchange Special Articles International Perspectives Mt./St. Anonymous: Cases and Institutional Policies Point/Counterpoint Argumentation Case Reviews, Analyses, and Resolutions Chairperson''s Section `Tough Spot'' Critical Annotations Health Law Alert Network News Letters to the Editors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书