{"title":"Evaluation of antitumor response to HDAC inhibitors in advanced head and neck cancer: A proportional meta-analysis of clinical trials.","authors":"Allen Pinto, Rajesh Raju, Soumya Patil, Nazah Naurah V, Raushan Kumar Chaudhary","doi":"10.1177/10781552261420755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo study the cumulative proportion of favorable response to Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor (HDACi) among head and neck cancer (HNC) patients.Data SourcesA systematic search (till 17<sup>th</sup>-May-2025) was carried out in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases using \"Head and Neck cancer\" and \"HDAC inhibitors\" as key concept where all the single-arm clinical trials which have clear data on response to HDACi therapy-based RECIST criteria among HNC patients were included in this study. The meta-analysis was performed using R software.Data SummaryThe search resulted in a total of 178 articles, of which 7 studies were found to be relevant based on the inclusion criteria. Out of a total of 101 advanced HNC patients treated with HDACi in single-arm clinical trials, 74 patients showed favorable antitumor response. The pooled cumulative proportion of favorable response with the random effect model was found to be 0.65. Out of these 7 studies, the average proportion of antitumor response was calculated to be 0.758 among HNC patients who received HDACi concurrently with chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and targeted therapy, whereas the average proportion of antitumor response rate to HDACi was 0.485 among priorly treated HNC patients. Vorinostat was the most used HDACi, where the proportion of favorable response was 0.49 compared to the non-vorinostat HDACi (0.77), like valproic acid, panobinostat, and romidepsin.ConclusionThe overall antitumor response to HDACi was found to be 0.65 (65%), which supports the use of HDACi among advanced HNC patients, particularly along with the concurrent chemo/chemoradiotherapy or targeted therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1380-1390"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552261420755","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectiveTo study the cumulative proportion of favorable response to Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor (HDACi) among head and neck cancer (HNC) patients.Data SourcesA systematic search (till 17th-May-2025) was carried out in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases using "Head and Neck cancer" and "HDAC inhibitors" as key concept where all the single-arm clinical trials which have clear data on response to HDACi therapy-based RECIST criteria among HNC patients were included in this study. The meta-analysis was performed using R software.Data SummaryThe search resulted in a total of 178 articles, of which 7 studies were found to be relevant based on the inclusion criteria. Out of a total of 101 advanced HNC patients treated with HDACi in single-arm clinical trials, 74 patients showed favorable antitumor response. The pooled cumulative proportion of favorable response with the random effect model was found to be 0.65. Out of these 7 studies, the average proportion of antitumor response was calculated to be 0.758 among HNC patients who received HDACi concurrently with chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and targeted therapy, whereas the average proportion of antitumor response rate to HDACi was 0.485 among priorly treated HNC patients. Vorinostat was the most used HDACi, where the proportion of favorable response was 0.49 compared to the non-vorinostat HDACi (0.77), like valproic acid, panobinostat, and romidepsin.ConclusionThe overall antitumor response to HDACi was found to be 0.65 (65%), which supports the use of HDACi among advanced HNC patients, particularly along with the concurrent chemo/chemoradiotherapy or targeted therapy.
目的研究组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂(HDACi)在头颈癌(HNC)患者中的累积反应比例。数据来源以“Head and Neck cancer”和“HDAC inhibitors”为核心概念,系统检索PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库(截至2025年5月17日),纳入HNC患者对基于HDAC治疗的RECIST标准有明确应答数据的单臂临床试验。meta分析采用R软件进行。检索结果为178篇文章,其中7篇研究根据纳入标准被发现是相关的。在单臂临床试验中,101例晚期HNC患者接受HDACi治疗,74例患者显示出良好的抗肿瘤反应。与随机效应模型合算的有利反应累积比例为0.65。在这7项研究中,计算出在化疗、放化疗和靶向治疗中同时接受HDACi治疗的HNC患者的平均抗肿瘤反应比例为0.758,而在既往治疗的HNC患者中,HDACi治疗的平均抗肿瘤反应比例为0.485。Vorinostat是最常用的HDACi,其良好反应比例为0.49,而非Vorinostat的HDACi(0.77),如丙戊酸、帕比司他和罗米地辛。结论HDACi的总抗肿瘤应答率为0.65(65%),支持在晚期HNC患者中使用HDACi,特别是在同步化疗/放化疗或靶向治疗的情况下。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...