Female versus Male Fetuses-Variation in Fetal Heart Rate Tracing and Adverse Outcomes at Term.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
American journal of perinatology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-11 DOI:10.1055/a-2807-4541
Aaron W Roberts, Kristen A Cagino, Rachel L Wiley, Fabrizio Zullo, Hector Mendez-Figueroa, Suneet P Chauhan
{"title":"Female versus Male Fetuses-Variation in Fetal Heart Rate Tracing and Adverse Outcomes at Term.","authors":"Aaron W Roberts, Kristen A Cagino, Rachel L Wiley, Fabrizio Zullo, Hector Mendez-Figueroa, Suneet P Chauhan","doi":"10.1055/a-2807-4541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the fetal heart rate tracing (FHRT) and composite adverse outcomes among female versus male newborns delivered at term.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The inclusion criteria of the retrospective study were non-anomalous singletons, delivered at ≥37 weeks after labor, whose sex assignment at birth was either female or male. The consecutive deliveries occurred over 15 months. Obstetricians-blinded to maternal characteristics and outcomes-interpreted the FHRT for the last 20 to 120 minutes of labor. Composite neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes (CNAO and CMAO) were compared between the groups. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 5,160 deliveries during the study period, 3,165 (61.3%) met the inclusion criteria, and among them, 1,514 (47.8%) were females, and 1,651 newborns (52.2%) were males. Obstetricians reviewed 358,620 minutes of FHRT. Compared to females, the FHRT among males was significantly more likely to have severe late decelerations (aOR = 5.25; 95% CI: 1.16-23.83) or any severe decelerations (aOR = 1.21; 95% CI: 1.03-1.42). Whether the tracing was category I, II, or III, the incidence was similar. Cesarean delivery for non-reassuring FHRT was more common among male than female newborns (aOR = 1.21; 95% CI: 1.03-1.41). CNAO for male newborns was significantly higher than that for female newborns (aOR = 2.55; 95% CI: 1.35-4.84). Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes was the component of the CNAO that differed significantly (aOR = 3.16; 95% CI: 1.27-7.86). CMAO was also significantly higher for individuals who delivered male (9.3%) versus female (6.3%) newborns (aOR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.16-1.98). Estimated blood loss ≥1,000 mL was significantly more likely among male than female newborns (aOR = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.09-2.08).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among singleton pregnancies delivered at term, male fetuses, compared to females, are significantly more likely to have abnormalities of FHRTs and adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Male fetuses have more severe decelerations, including severe late decelerations, than females.. · Cesarean delivery for non-reassuring FHRT is significantly more common in male than female fetuses.. · CNAO is significantly more common in male than female fetuses.. · CMAO is significantly more common in male than female fetuses..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":"1626-1634"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2807-4541","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the fetal heart rate tracing (FHRT) and composite adverse outcomes among female versus male newborns delivered at term.

Study design: The inclusion criteria of the retrospective study were non-anomalous singletons, delivered at ≥37 weeks after labor, whose sex assignment at birth was either female or male. The consecutive deliveries occurred over 15 months. Obstetricians-blinded to maternal characteristics and outcomes-interpreted the FHRT for the last 20 to 120 minutes of labor. Composite neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes (CNAO and CMAO) were compared between the groups. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

Results: Of the 5,160 deliveries during the study period, 3,165 (61.3%) met the inclusion criteria, and among them, 1,514 (47.8%) were females, and 1,651 newborns (52.2%) were males. Obstetricians reviewed 358,620 minutes of FHRT. Compared to females, the FHRT among males was significantly more likely to have severe late decelerations (aOR = 5.25; 95% CI: 1.16-23.83) or any severe decelerations (aOR = 1.21; 95% CI: 1.03-1.42). Whether the tracing was category I, II, or III, the incidence was similar. Cesarean delivery for non-reassuring FHRT was more common among male than female newborns (aOR = 1.21; 95% CI: 1.03-1.41). CNAO for male newborns was significantly higher than that for female newborns (aOR = 2.55; 95% CI: 1.35-4.84). Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes was the component of the CNAO that differed significantly (aOR = 3.16; 95% CI: 1.27-7.86). CMAO was also significantly higher for individuals who delivered male (9.3%) versus female (6.3%) newborns (aOR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.16-1.98). Estimated blood loss ≥1,000 mL was significantly more likely among male than female newborns (aOR = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.09-2.08).

Conclusion: Among singleton pregnancies delivered at term, male fetuses, compared to females, are significantly more likely to have abnormalities of FHRTs and adverse outcomes.

Key points: · Male fetuses have more severe decelerations, including severe late decelerations, than females.. · Cesarean delivery for non-reassuring FHRT is significantly more common in male than female fetuses.. · CNAO is significantly more common in male than female fetuses.. · CMAO is significantly more common in male than female fetuses..

女胎与男胎——足月胎儿心率追踪和不良结局的差异。
目的:比较女性和男性足月新生儿的胎心率追踪(FHRT)和综合不良结局。研究设计:回顾性研究的纳入标准为无异常单胎,分娩后0 ~ 37周分娩,出生时性别为男性或女性。连续分娩发生在15个月内。产科医生对产妇的特征和结果一无所知,在分娩的最后20到120分钟解释FHRT。比较两组新生儿和产妇的综合不良结局(CNAO和CMAO)。计算校正优势比(aOR)和95%置信区间(CI)。结果:研究期间5160例新生儿中,3165例(61.3%)符合纳入标准,其中女性1514例(47.8%),男性1651例(52.2%)。产科医生回顾了358,620分钟的FHRT。与女性相比,男性的FHRT更可能出现严重的晚期减速(aOR 5.25; 95% CI 1.16-23.83),或任何严重的减速(aOR 1.21; 95% CI 1.03 - 1.42)。无论是ⅰ类、ⅱ类还是ⅲ类的追踪都是相似的。因FHRT治疗无效而剖宫产的新生儿男性多于女性(aOR 1.21; 95% 1.03-1.41)。男性新生儿的CNAO显著高于女性新生儿(aOR 2.55; 95% CI 1.35-4.84)。5 min时Apgar评分< 7是CNAO差异显著的组成部分(aOR 3.16; 95% CI 1.27-7.86)。出生男性新生儿的CMAO(9.3%)也显著高于出生女性新生儿(6.3%)(aOR 1.51, 95% CI 1.16-1.98)。男性新生儿的估计失血量明显高于女性新生儿(aOR 1.51; 95% CI 1.09-2.08)。结论:在足月分娩的单胎妊娠中,与女性相比,男性胎儿更容易出现胎儿心率追踪异常和不良后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书