Minhazur Sarker, Jeffrey D Sperling, Ukachi N Emeruwa, Elizabeth N Teal
{"title":"Expectant Management Beyond 34 Weeks' Gestation Should Be Offered for Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes.","authors":"Minhazur Sarker, Jeffrey D Sperling, Ukachi N Emeruwa, Elizabeth N Teal","doi":"10.1055/a-2809-6494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Delivery timing for preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) was historically recommended at 34 weeks' gestation. Recent studies have shown expectant management of PPROM beyond 34 weeks is associated with increased antepartum or intrapartum hemorrhage and intrapartum fever and decreased risk of newborn respiratory distress, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, and cesarean delivery. Despite the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), and the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) embracing expectant management as an option to consider for PPROM, widespread uptake and implementation of this management and the nuanced discussion remain mixed. With this clinical opinion, we highlight the outcomes associated with expectant management of PPROM beyond 34 weeks, summarize the current state of the controversy, review the nationally published guidelines, and discuss our opinion on the controversy as well as future directions for research endeavors. Given the data present at this time, we believe that providers should at least routinely offer, but not necessarily recommend, the option of expectant management for PPROM beyond 34 weeks in the absence of contraindications. Foregoing this discussion limits patients' ability to make informed decisions and, worse, if not universally offered in the absence of contraindications to expectant management, may be an area of inequitable or biased care. · Recent studies have characterized outcomes with expectant management of PPROM after 34 weeks.. · There remains controversy regarding delivery timing for pregnancies complicated by PPROM.. · Expectant management should be routinely offered for PPROM in the absence of contraindications..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":"1688-1692"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12950273/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2809-6494","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Delivery timing for preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) was historically recommended at 34 weeks' gestation. Recent studies have shown expectant management of PPROM beyond 34 weeks is associated with increased antepartum or intrapartum hemorrhage and intrapartum fever and decreased risk of newborn respiratory distress, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, and cesarean delivery. Despite the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), and the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) embracing expectant management as an option to consider for PPROM, widespread uptake and implementation of this management and the nuanced discussion remain mixed. With this clinical opinion, we highlight the outcomes associated with expectant management of PPROM beyond 34 weeks, summarize the current state of the controversy, review the nationally published guidelines, and discuss our opinion on the controversy as well as future directions for research endeavors. Given the data present at this time, we believe that providers should at least routinely offer, but not necessarily recommend, the option of expectant management for PPROM beyond 34 weeks in the absence of contraindications. Foregoing this discussion limits patients' ability to make informed decisions and, worse, if not universally offered in the absence of contraindications to expectant management, may be an area of inequitable or biased care. · Recent studies have characterized outcomes with expectant management of PPROM after 34 weeks.. · There remains controversy regarding delivery timing for pregnancies complicated by PPROM.. · Expectant management should be routinely offered for PPROM in the absence of contraindications..
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields.
The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field.
All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication.
The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.