Expectant Management Beyond 34 Weeks' Gestation Should Be Offered for Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
American journal of perinatology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-11 DOI:10.1055/a-2809-6494
Minhazur Sarker, Jeffrey D Sperling, Ukachi N Emeruwa, Elizabeth N Teal
{"title":"Expectant Management Beyond 34 Weeks' Gestation Should Be Offered for Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes.","authors":"Minhazur Sarker, Jeffrey D Sperling, Ukachi N Emeruwa, Elizabeth N Teal","doi":"10.1055/a-2809-6494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Delivery timing for preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) was historically recommended at 34 weeks' gestation. Recent studies have shown expectant management of PPROM beyond 34 weeks is associated with increased antepartum or intrapartum hemorrhage and intrapartum fever and decreased risk of newborn respiratory distress, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, and cesarean delivery. Despite the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), and the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) embracing expectant management as an option to consider for PPROM, widespread uptake and implementation of this management and the nuanced discussion remain mixed. With this clinical opinion, we highlight the outcomes associated with expectant management of PPROM beyond 34 weeks, summarize the current state of the controversy, review the nationally published guidelines, and discuss our opinion on the controversy as well as future directions for research endeavors. Given the data present at this time, we believe that providers should at least routinely offer, but not necessarily recommend, the option of expectant management for PPROM beyond 34 weeks in the absence of contraindications. Foregoing this discussion limits patients' ability to make informed decisions and, worse, if not universally offered in the absence of contraindications to expectant management, may be an area of inequitable or biased care. · Recent studies have characterized outcomes with expectant management of PPROM after 34 weeks.. · There remains controversy regarding delivery timing for pregnancies complicated by PPROM.. · Expectant management should be routinely offered for PPROM in the absence of contraindications..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":"1688-1692"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12950273/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2809-6494","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Delivery timing for preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) was historically recommended at 34 weeks' gestation. Recent studies have shown expectant management of PPROM beyond 34 weeks is associated with increased antepartum or intrapartum hemorrhage and intrapartum fever and decreased risk of newborn respiratory distress, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, and cesarean delivery. Despite the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), and the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) embracing expectant management as an option to consider for PPROM, widespread uptake and implementation of this management and the nuanced discussion remain mixed. With this clinical opinion, we highlight the outcomes associated with expectant management of PPROM beyond 34 weeks, summarize the current state of the controversy, review the nationally published guidelines, and discuss our opinion on the controversy as well as future directions for research endeavors. Given the data present at this time, we believe that providers should at least routinely offer, but not necessarily recommend, the option of expectant management for PPROM beyond 34 weeks in the absence of contraindications. Foregoing this discussion limits patients' ability to make informed decisions and, worse, if not universally offered in the absence of contraindications to expectant management, may be an area of inequitable or biased care. · Recent studies have characterized outcomes with expectant management of PPROM after 34 weeks.. · There remains controversy regarding delivery timing for pregnancies complicated by PPROM.. · Expectant management should be routinely offered for PPROM in the absence of contraindications..

妊娠34周以上应给予胎膜早破的准管理。
早产胎膜破裂(PPROM)的分娩时间历来建议在妊娠34周。最近的研究表明,超过34周的PPROM的预期治疗与产前或产时出血和产时发热的增加以及新生儿呼吸窘迫、新生儿重症监护病房入院和剖宫产的风险降低有关。尽管美国妇产科学院、皇家妇产科学院和加拿大妇产科学会都支持将预期管理作为PPROM的一种选择,但这种管理的广泛接受和实施以及细致入微的讨论仍然存在分歧。根据这一临床观点,我们强调了预期治疗34周以上PPROM的相关结果,总结了目前的争议状态,回顾了国家出版的指南,并讨论了我们对争议的看法以及未来的研究方向。鉴于目前的数据,我们认为,在没有禁忌症的情况下,提供者至少应该常规地提供(但不一定推荐)超过34周的PPROM的预期治疗选择。上述讨论限制了患者做出明智决定的能力,更糟糕的是,如果不是在适当的环境中普遍提供,可能是一个不公平或有偏见的护理领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书