Archiving Futurity Within the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women's Crisis

IF 1.9 1区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
American Anthropologist Pub Date : 2026-02-11 Epub Date: 2025-12-17 DOI:10.1111/aman.70048
Lindsay Martel Montgomery, Heather Pezzarossi, Jennifer P. Byram
{"title":"Archiving Futurity Within the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women's Crisis","authors":"Lindsay Martel Montgomery,&nbsp;Heather Pezzarossi,&nbsp;Jennifer P. Byram","doi":"10.1111/aman.70048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this article, we examine how settler colonization and gendered violence against Indigenous women are remembered and recorded in two archival registers: 18th-century records from the Massachusetts Archives Collection (MAC) and a 21st-century corpus of posts using the hashtag MMIW (Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women) on X (formerly Twitter). These archives are shaped by distinct temporal logics and contain multiple projections of settler and Indigenous futurity. The MAC is dominated by the colonial logic of recursive dispossession; a temporal perspective of declension that acknowledges Indigenous lands only after they are taken, and Indigenous people only after they are “disappeared.” A close reading of these documentary sources also reveals how Indigenous peoples worked within this system to maintain social relationships and connections to place. We contrast settler visions of futurity with contemporary social media articulations of vibrant and emancipatory Indigenous futures grounded in hope and presence. Through this comparative discussion, we demonstrate how different documentary modalities encode time, define events, and shape informational flows in ways that enable and constrain Indigenous futurity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"128 1","pages":"85-96"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aman.70048","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Anthropologist","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aman.70048","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, we examine how settler colonization and gendered violence against Indigenous women are remembered and recorded in two archival registers: 18th-century records from the Massachusetts Archives Collection (MAC) and a 21st-century corpus of posts using the hashtag MMIW (Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women) on X (formerly Twitter). These archives are shaped by distinct temporal logics and contain multiple projections of settler and Indigenous futurity. The MAC is dominated by the colonial logic of recursive dispossession; a temporal perspective of declension that acknowledges Indigenous lands only after they are taken, and Indigenous people only after they are “disappeared.” A close reading of these documentary sources also reveals how Indigenous peoples worked within this system to maintain social relationships and connections to place. We contrast settler visions of futurity with contemporary social media articulations of vibrant and emancipatory Indigenous futures grounded in hope and presence. Through this comparative discussion, we demonstrate how different documentary modalities encode time, define events, and shape informational flows in ways that enable and constrain Indigenous futurity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在失踪和被谋杀的土著妇女危机中记录未来
在本文中,我们研究了移民殖民和针对土著妇女的性别暴力是如何在两个档案记录中被记住和记录的:马萨诸塞州档案收藏(MAC)的18世纪记录,以及X(以前的Twitter)上使用标签MMIW(失踪和被谋杀的土著妇女)的21世纪帖子语库。这些档案是由独特的时间逻辑塑造的,包含了对定居者和土著未来的多种预测。MAC被递归剥夺的殖民逻辑所支配;这是一种对退化的时间视角,只有在土著的土地被占领之后,土著人民才会被承认,只有在他们“消失”之后。仔细阅读这些文献资料,还可以发现土著人民如何在这个系统内工作,以维持社会关系和与地方的联系。我们将定居者对未来的愿景与当代社交媒体对充满活力和解放的土著未来的表达进行了对比,这些未来基于希望和存在。通过这种比较讨论,我们展示了不同的纪录片形式如何编码时间,定义事件,并以促进和限制土著未来的方式塑造信息流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Anthropologist
American Anthropologist ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: American Anthropologist is the flagship journal of the American Anthropological Association, reaching well over 12,000 readers with each issue. The journal advances the Association mission through publishing articles that add to, integrate, synthesize, and interpret anthropological knowledge; commentaries and essays on issues of importance to the discipline; and reviews of books, films, sound recordings and exhibits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书