Usability Evaluation of a Push-Based Passwordless Authentication Model Using Public-Key Cryptography

IF 1.6 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Ghulam Mustafa, Shah Zaman Nizamani, Irfana Memon, Asif Ali Wagan, Solomiia Fedushko, Abdullah Al Hejaili
{"title":"Usability Evaluation of a Push-Based Passwordless Authentication Model Using Public-Key Cryptography","authors":"Ghulam Mustafa,&nbsp;Shah Zaman Nizamani,&nbsp;Irfana Memon,&nbsp;Asif Ali Wagan,&nbsp;Solomiia Fedushko,&nbsp;Abdullah Al Hejaili","doi":"10.1049/bme2/5462893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite major advancements in the sphere of the public-key authentication specifically in the instances of the newly established standards like WebAuthn and the FIDO2, the practical implementation of the passwordless login systems is still hindered by the usability factors, platform-related requirements, and the very nature of the deployment process is predetermined by its complex character. We formulate in this contribution a practical, push-based authentication model, which takes active advantage of the utilization of the public-key cryptography, combined with the traditional set of capabilities in mobile devices, to provide a secure and consumer-friendly way of logging into a system. The architecture has been implemented using the Laravel web application framework, the Flutter cross-platform mobile development system, and Firebase Cloud Messaging (FCM), thus enabling authentication using smartphone-initiated approvals and digital signatures. A within-subject usability experiment with 160 participants was the measure of effectiveness of the proposed approach. The participants were requested to fulfill the tasks of logins with the postulated push-based mechanism and an experimental password-based one. System logs provided objective metrics such as the latency to log in, rate of errors, and the success rate of the first attempt. At the same time, the subjective ratings were gathered through the means of structured questionnaires where the ease of use, speed, security, and preferences were measured. Empirical data revealed that despite the insignificant increase in time of login, the passwordless system reported a significant decrease in error, increase in success rate, and a significant preference among the subjects in all the dimensions of usability that were being tested. Each of the observed differences was statistically significant and with large effect sizes. This research provides a deplorable, platform adaptable authentication paradigm that preempts realistic coping, yet holds core security standards. Emphasizing the need to balance system design with human-centered assessment the work suggests a possible solution to more complex or more hardware-resources limited passwordless usage.</p>","PeriodicalId":48821,"journal":{"name":"IET Biometrics","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/bme2/5462893","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Biometrics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/bme2/5462893","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite major advancements in the sphere of the public-key authentication specifically in the instances of the newly established standards like WebAuthn and the FIDO2, the practical implementation of the passwordless login systems is still hindered by the usability factors, platform-related requirements, and the very nature of the deployment process is predetermined by its complex character. We formulate in this contribution a practical, push-based authentication model, which takes active advantage of the utilization of the public-key cryptography, combined with the traditional set of capabilities in mobile devices, to provide a secure and consumer-friendly way of logging into a system. The architecture has been implemented using the Laravel web application framework, the Flutter cross-platform mobile development system, and Firebase Cloud Messaging (FCM), thus enabling authentication using smartphone-initiated approvals and digital signatures. A within-subject usability experiment with 160 participants was the measure of effectiveness of the proposed approach. The participants were requested to fulfill the tasks of logins with the postulated push-based mechanism and an experimental password-based one. System logs provided objective metrics such as the latency to log in, rate of errors, and the success rate of the first attempt. At the same time, the subjective ratings were gathered through the means of structured questionnaires where the ease of use, speed, security, and preferences were measured. Empirical data revealed that despite the insignificant increase in time of login, the passwordless system reported a significant decrease in error, increase in success rate, and a significant preference among the subjects in all the dimensions of usability that were being tested. Each of the observed differences was statistically significant and with large effect sizes. This research provides a deplorable, platform adaptable authentication paradigm that preempts realistic coping, yet holds core security standards. Emphasizing the need to balance system design with human-centered assessment the work suggests a possible solution to more complex or more hardware-resources limited passwordless usage.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于公钥加密的推送无密码认证模型的可用性评估
尽管在公开密钥认证领域取得了重大进展,特别是在WebAuthn和FIDO2等新建立的标准的实例中,无密码登录系统的实际实现仍然受到可用性因素、与平台相关的要求以及部署过程的本质是由其复杂性决定的。我们在这篇文章中制定了一个实用的、基于推送的身份验证模型,该模型积极利用了公钥加密技术,结合了移动设备中的传统功能集,提供了一种安全且对用户友好的登录系统的方式。该架构是使用Laravel web应用程序框架、Flutter跨平台移动开发系统和Firebase Cloud Messaging (FCM)实现的,因此可以使用智能手机发起的批准和数字签名进行身份验证。有160名参与者参与的主题可用性实验是对所提出方法有效性的衡量。参与者被要求使用假设的基于推送的机制和实验的基于密码的机制来完成登录任务。系统日志提供客观的度量,例如登录延迟、错误率和第一次尝试的成功率。同时,通过结构化问卷的方式收集主观评分,其中测量了易用性,速度,安全性和偏好。经验数据显示,尽管登录时间不显著增加,无密码系统报告的错误显著减少,成功率增加,并在可用性的所有维度被测试的受试者显著偏好。观察到的每一个差异在统计学上都是显著的,并且具有很大的效应量。这项研究提供了一种令人遗憾的、可适应平台的身份验证范式,它抢占了现实的应对,但保持了核心安全标准。强调需要平衡系统设计与以人为中心的评估,工作提出了一个可能的解决方案,以更复杂或更多的硬件资源有限的无密码使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IET Biometrics
IET Biometrics COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊介绍: The field of biometric recognition - automated recognition of individuals based on their behavioural and biological characteristics - has now reached a level of maturity where viable practical applications are both possible and increasingly available. The biometrics field is characterised especially by its interdisciplinarity since, while focused primarily around a strong technological base, effective system design and implementation often requires a broad range of skills encompassing, for example, human factors, data security and database technologies, psychological and physiological awareness, and so on. Also, the technology focus itself embraces diversity, since the engineering of effective biometric systems requires integration of image analysis, pattern recognition, sensor technology, database engineering, security design and many other strands of understanding. The scope of the journal is intentionally relatively wide. While focusing on core technological issues, it is recognised that these may be inherently diverse and in many cases may cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The scope of the journal will therefore include any topics where it can be shown that a paper can increase our understanding of biometric systems, signal future developments and applications for biometrics, or promote greater practical uptake for relevant technologies: Development and enhancement of individual biometric modalities including the established and traditional modalities (e.g. face, fingerprint, iris, signature and handwriting recognition) and also newer or emerging modalities (gait, ear-shape, neurological patterns, etc.) Multibiometrics, theoretical and practical issues, implementation of practical systems, multiclassifier and multimodal approaches Soft biometrics and information fusion for identification, verification and trait prediction Human factors and the human-computer interface issues for biometric systems, exception handling strategies Template construction and template management, ageing factors and their impact on biometric systems Usability and user-oriented design, psychological and physiological principles and system integration Sensors and sensor technologies for biometric processing Database technologies to support biometric systems Implementation of biometric systems, security engineering implications, smartcard and associated technologies in implementation, implementation platforms, system design and performance evaluation Trust and privacy issues, security of biometric systems and supporting technological solutions, biometric template protection Biometric cryptosystems, security and biometrics-linked encryption Links with forensic processing and cross-disciplinary commonalities Core underpinning technologies (e.g. image analysis, pattern recognition, computer vision, signal processing, etc.), where the specific relevance to biometric processing can be demonstrated Applications and application-led considerations Position papers on technology or on the industrial context of biometric system development Adoption and promotion of standards in biometrics, improving technology acceptance, deployment and interoperability, avoiding cross-cultural and cross-sector restrictions Relevant ethical and social issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书