“Everything Is Just Done Away With Now”: Contentious Practices of Scalar Brokerage Motivated by Narratives of Welfare Nostalgia in Postcolonial Rotterdam

IF 1.9 1区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
American Anthropologist Pub Date : 2026-02-11 Epub Date: 2025-12-29 DOI:10.1111/aman.70052
Lieke van der Veer
{"title":"“Everything Is Just Done Away With Now”: Contentious Practices of Scalar Brokerage Motivated by Narratives of Welfare Nostalgia in Postcolonial Rotterdam","authors":"Lieke van der Veer","doi":"10.1111/aman.70052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>According to anthropological theories of brokerage, brokers build bridges, close gaps, make connections, and construct shared norms. In this article, I argue that such structural-functionalist approaches to brokerage do not prove adequate in addressing unsettled and unsettling scale-making practices of refugee-led support initiatives in postcolonial Europe. Refugee advocates of long-term Dutch heritage evoke narratives of nostalgia for a long-lost welfare state to motivate their commitment to social justice and for the inclusion of refugee-led initiatives. However, this article demonstrates that the alleged universality of social security in the postwar caring state is a myth and that fantasies of down-scaled local action cohere with uneasy postcolonial formations. These formations surface in everyday interactions between advocates and organizers with a forced-migration background. Organizers need the support of advocates in dealing with experiences of intersectional racism, but their dependent relationship with advocates is not devoid of power asymmetries either. Inequalities in these relationships culminate in negotiations over scale: whereas advocates are committed to downscaling refugee-led initiatives and weaving together local networks of sociality, organizers seek to upscale their initiative beyond the neighborhood and pursue social mobility. These controversies over scale echo social injustices that are bound up with postwar repair and decolonization.</p>","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"128 1","pages":"108-119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aman.70052","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Anthropologist","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aman.70052","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to anthropological theories of brokerage, brokers build bridges, close gaps, make connections, and construct shared norms. In this article, I argue that such structural-functionalist approaches to brokerage do not prove adequate in addressing unsettled and unsettling scale-making practices of refugee-led support initiatives in postcolonial Europe. Refugee advocates of long-term Dutch heritage evoke narratives of nostalgia for a long-lost welfare state to motivate their commitment to social justice and for the inclusion of refugee-led initiatives. However, this article demonstrates that the alleged universality of social security in the postwar caring state is a myth and that fantasies of down-scaled local action cohere with uneasy postcolonial formations. These formations surface in everyday interactions between advocates and organizers with a forced-migration background. Organizers need the support of advocates in dealing with experiences of intersectional racism, but their dependent relationship with advocates is not devoid of power asymmetries either. Inequalities in these relationships culminate in negotiations over scale: whereas advocates are committed to downscaling refugee-led initiatives and weaving together local networks of sociality, organizers seek to upscale their initiative beyond the neighborhood and pursue social mobility. These controversies over scale echo social injustices that are bound up with postwar repair and decolonization.

“现在一切都被抛弃了”:后殖民时期鹿特丹福利怀旧叙事引发的标量经纪的争议实践
根据人类学的经纪理论,经纪人建立桥梁,缩小差距,建立联系,构建共享规范。在本文中,我认为这种结构功能主义的中介方法不足以解决后殖民欧洲难民主导的支持倡议中不稳定和令人不安的规模制作实践。荷兰长期遗产的难民倡导者唤起了对长期失去的福利国家的怀旧之情,以激励他们致力于社会正义,并纳入难民主导的倡议。然而,本文表明,所谓的战后关怀国家社会保障的普遍性是一个神话,而缩小规模的地方行动的幻想与不安的后殖民形态是一致的。这些形式在有强迫移民背景的倡导者和组织者之间的日常互动中浮出水面。在处理交叉种族主义的经历时,组织者需要倡导者的支持,但他们与倡导者的依赖关系也并非没有权力不对称。这些关系中的不平等在规模谈判中达到顶峰:虽然倡导者致力于缩小难民主导的倡议的规模,并将当地的社会网络编织在一起,但组织者寻求将他们的倡议扩大到社区之外,并追求社会流动性。这些关于规模的争论呼应了与战后修复和非殖民化相关的社会不公正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Anthropologist
American Anthropologist ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: American Anthropologist is the flagship journal of the American Anthropological Association, reaching well over 12,000 readers with each issue. The journal advances the Association mission through publishing articles that add to, integrate, synthesize, and interpret anthropological knowledge; commentaries and essays on issues of importance to the discipline; and reviews of books, films, sound recordings and exhibits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书