Carbon sink conservation: Cost-effective spatial priorities and feasible management policies for China

IF 6.6 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Land Use Policy Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.107974
Jingyi Liu , Menghan Zhang , Yu Xia , Longfeng Wu , Chongxian Chen
{"title":"Carbon sink conservation: Cost-effective spatial priorities and feasible management policies for China","authors":"Jingyi Liu ,&nbsp;Menghan Zhang ,&nbsp;Yu Xia ,&nbsp;Longfeng Wu ,&nbsp;Chongxian Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.107974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>For effective climate mitigation, land ecosystem conservation should focus on preserving carbon sinks instead of carbon stocks. However, the carbon sink capacity of land ecosystems is dynamic and uncertain, and its conservation is management-intensive and livelihood-impacting. This calls for more reliable evidence on future carbon sink dynamics and feasible policies for their conservation. This study evaluated spatial priorities for future carbon sink conservation in China by predicting carbon sink capacity from 2020 to 2100 using machine-learning models, while also mapping potential costs associated with management and population impacts. We found that intensified climate change may undermine future carbon sink capacity across extensive regions. Prioritised conservation areas were identified primarily in central, southern, and northeastern China, covering 8 %, 21.3 %, and 33.9 % of the country under conservative, moderate, and ambitious conservation targets, respectively. There is a modest synergy between priorities for carbon sink and biodiversity conservation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.515 and a spatial overlap of 9.9 %–42.6 % depending on conservation target levels. For actionable policies, we recommend focusing intensive management on just 12.6 % of China’s land, which aligns well with existing national ecological restoration projects. These findings provide evidence-based and feasible policies for carbon sink conservation in a resource-constrained country, with implications discussed for developing countries worldwide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 107974"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483772600058X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For effective climate mitigation, land ecosystem conservation should focus on preserving carbon sinks instead of carbon stocks. However, the carbon sink capacity of land ecosystems is dynamic and uncertain, and its conservation is management-intensive and livelihood-impacting. This calls for more reliable evidence on future carbon sink dynamics and feasible policies for their conservation. This study evaluated spatial priorities for future carbon sink conservation in China by predicting carbon sink capacity from 2020 to 2100 using machine-learning models, while also mapping potential costs associated with management and population impacts. We found that intensified climate change may undermine future carbon sink capacity across extensive regions. Prioritised conservation areas were identified primarily in central, southern, and northeastern China, covering 8 %, 21.3 %, and 33.9 % of the country under conservative, moderate, and ambitious conservation targets, respectively. There is a modest synergy between priorities for carbon sink and biodiversity conservation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.515 and a spatial overlap of 9.9 %–42.6 % depending on conservation target levels. For actionable policies, we recommend focusing intensive management on just 12.6 % of China’s land, which aligns well with existing national ecological restoration projects. These findings provide evidence-based and feasible policies for carbon sink conservation in a resource-constrained country, with implications discussed for developing countries worldwide.
碳汇保护:中国的成本效益空间优先与可行管理政策
为有效减缓气候变化,保护土地生态系统应侧重于保护碳汇,而不是碳储量。然而,土地生态系统的碳汇能力是动态的和不确定的,其保护是管理密集型和影响生计的。这需要关于未来碳汇动态和可行的保护政策的更可靠的证据。本研究通过使用机器学习模型预测2020 - 2100年中国碳汇容量,同时绘制与管理和人口影响相关的潜在成本,评估了中国未来碳汇保护的空间优先级。我们发现,气候变化加剧可能会破坏广大地区未来的碳汇能力。重点保护区主要位于中国中部、南部和东北部,在保守、中等和雄心保护目标下,分别覆盖了全国的8. %、21.3% %和33.9% %。碳汇优先级与生物多样性保护优先级之间存在一定的协同效应,相关系数为0.515,空间重叠度为9.9 % ~ 42.6% %,具体取决于保护目标水平。对于可行的政策,我们建议将集中管理集中在中国12.6% %的土地上,这与现有的国家生态恢复项目非常吻合。这些发现为资源受限国家的碳汇保护提供了基于证据的可行政策,并讨论了对全世界发展中国家的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Use Policy
Land Use Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
553
期刊介绍: Land Use Policy is an international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the social, economic, political, legal, physical and planning aspects of urban and rural land use. Land Use Policy examines issues in geography, agriculture, forestry, irrigation, environmental conservation, housing, urban development and transport in both developed and developing countries through major refereed articles and shorter viewpoint pieces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书