Understanding clinician deviance: A systematic review of text messaging practices.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Health Care Management Review Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-10 DOI:10.1097/HMR.0000000000000466
Michele L Heath, Tracy H Porter, Ashleigh Allgood
{"title":"Understanding clinician deviance: A systematic review of text messaging practices.","authors":"Michele L Heath, Tracy H Porter, Ashleigh Allgood","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinicians in the United States often prefer quick, efficient, and convenient ways to communicate with colleagues. However, using standard text messaging without a secure text messaging system (STMS) constitutes a violation of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act regulations.</p><p><strong>Purposes: </strong>This systematic review aims to investigate why clinicians might choose not to use STMSs when sharing patient health information (PHI) with their peers. This research will explore whether these clinicians are consciously disregarding federal guidelines concerning the texting of PHI and the reasons behind this choice. Deliberate noncompliance could be classified as a form of deviant behavior within the workplace.</p><p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>We conducted a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis-guided systematic literature review across four databases, examining 10 empirical studies from the United States published in English between January 2017 and August 2024.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified deviant behaviors associated with the unsecured text messaging of PHI through a deductive approach. These behaviors were classified based on Lawrence and Robinson's workplace deviance framework, which includes the need for autonomy, social identity, and perceived organizational justice. We also found inductive themes, which included training needs and increased workloads.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>The findings of this study demonstrate a number of areas hospital leaders might examine relevant to this topic, including reluctance to use STMSs, a choice to adopt it, or a tendency to blame issues on inadequate policies or insufficient training. This situation emphasizes the necessity of offering comprehensive training and clear policies to address both the psychological barriers and practical challenges faced by clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":" ","pages":"78-86"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000466","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinicians in the United States often prefer quick, efficient, and convenient ways to communicate with colleagues. However, using standard text messaging without a secure text messaging system (STMS) constitutes a violation of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act regulations.

Purposes: This systematic review aims to investigate why clinicians might choose not to use STMSs when sharing patient health information (PHI) with their peers. This research will explore whether these clinicians are consciously disregarding federal guidelines concerning the texting of PHI and the reasons behind this choice. Deliberate noncompliance could be classified as a form of deviant behavior within the workplace.

Methodology/approach: We conducted a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis-guided systematic literature review across four databases, examining 10 empirical studies from the United States published in English between January 2017 and August 2024.

Conclusion: We identified deviant behaviors associated with the unsecured text messaging of PHI through a deductive approach. These behaviors were classified based on Lawrence and Robinson's workplace deviance framework, which includes the need for autonomy, social identity, and perceived organizational justice. We also found inductive themes, which included training needs and increased workloads.

Practice implications: The findings of this study demonstrate a number of areas hospital leaders might examine relevant to this topic, including reluctance to use STMSs, a choice to adopt it, or a tendency to blame issues on inadequate policies or insufficient training. This situation emphasizes the necessity of offering comprehensive training and clear policies to address both the psychological barriers and practical challenges faced by clinicians.

理解临床医生的越轨行为:对短信实践的系统回顾。
背景:美国的临床医生通常更喜欢快速、高效、方便的方式与同事沟通。然而,在没有安全短信系统(STMS)的情况下使用标准短信违反了《健康保险流通与责任法案》的规定。目的:本系统综述旨在探讨为什么临床医生在与同行分享患者健康信息(PHI)时可能会选择不使用STMSs。本研究将探讨这些临床医生是否有意识地无视有关PHI短信的联邦指导方针以及这种选择背后的原因。故意不服从可以被归类为工作场所的一种越轨行为。方法/方法:我们对四个数据库进行了系统评价和meta分析指导的系统文献综述的首选报告项目,检查了2017年1月至2024年8月期间发表的10项美国英语实证研究。结论:我们通过演绎方法确定了与PHI的不安全短信相关的异常行为。这些行为是根据劳伦斯和罗宾逊的工作场所偏差框架进行分类的,其中包括自主性需求、社会认同和感知组织正义。我们还发现了归纳性主题,其中包括培训需求和工作量增加。实践启示:本研究的结果表明,医院领导可能会检查与本主题相关的许多领域,包括不愿使用STMSs,选择采用它,或倾向于将问题归咎于政策不足或培训不足。这种情况强调了提供全面培训和明确政策的必要性,以解决临床医生面临的心理障碍和实际挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Care Management Review
Health Care Management Review HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Health Care Management Review (HCMR) disseminates state-of-the-art knowledge about management, leadership, and administration of health care systems, organizations, and agencies. Multidisciplinary and international in scope, articles present completed research relevant to health care management, leadership, and administration, as well report on rigorous evaluations of health care management innovations, or provide a synthesis of prior research that results in evidence-based health care management practice recommendations. Articles are theory-driven and translate findings into implications and recommendations for health care administrators, researchers, and faculty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书