Li Mei, Fay Yan, Lei Cheng, Aishah Na, Richard D Cannon, Guangzhao Guan
{"title":"Tongue brushing and oral probiotics for the treatment of halitosis: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Li Mei, Fay Yan, Lei Cheng, Aishah Na, Richard D Cannon, Guangzhao Guan","doi":"10.1088/1752-7163/ae3edc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the effectiveness and sustainability of oral probiotics (<i>Streptococcus salivarius</i>K12), tongue brushing, and their combination in reducing halitosis. The study was a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. A total of 80 participants were randomly allocated to four groups: control (<i>n</i>= 20), oral probiotics (<i>n</i>= 20), tongue brushing (<i>n</i>= 20), and a combined group of tongue brushing and oral probiotics (<i>n</i>= 20). Assessments were taken at three time points: at baseline; after a 4-week intervention; and at a 4-week intervention-free follow-up. The outcome measurements included volatile sulfur compound (VSC), self-reported halitosis, organoleptic score, and tongue coating index. After the 4-week intervention, VSC levels were significantly decreased in the oral probiotics, tongue brushing, and combined groups (all<i>p</i>< 0.05), with the greatest reduction observed in the combined group. At the 4-week intervention-free follow-up, the combined group VSC levels remained significantly lower than baseline, despite slight rebounds. Self-reported halitosis scores decreased after intervention and follow-up (<i>p</i>< 0.05). Organoleptic scores improved only in the combined group post-intervention (<i>p</i>< 0.01). Tongue coating scores decreased in both tongue brushing and combined groups, but not in the oral probiotics group. Both tongue brushing and oral probiotics were effective in reducing halitosis, with the combined intervention producing the most significant and sustained improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":15306,"journal":{"name":"Journal of breath research","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of breath research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/ae3edc","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To evaluate the effectiveness and sustainability of oral probiotics (Streptococcus salivariusK12), tongue brushing, and their combination in reducing halitosis. The study was a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. A total of 80 participants were randomly allocated to four groups: control (n= 20), oral probiotics (n= 20), tongue brushing (n= 20), and a combined group of tongue brushing and oral probiotics (n= 20). Assessments were taken at three time points: at baseline; after a 4-week intervention; and at a 4-week intervention-free follow-up. The outcome measurements included volatile sulfur compound (VSC), self-reported halitosis, organoleptic score, and tongue coating index. After the 4-week intervention, VSC levels were significantly decreased in the oral probiotics, tongue brushing, and combined groups (allp< 0.05), with the greatest reduction observed in the combined group. At the 4-week intervention-free follow-up, the combined group VSC levels remained significantly lower than baseline, despite slight rebounds. Self-reported halitosis scores decreased after intervention and follow-up (p< 0.05). Organoleptic scores improved only in the combined group post-intervention (p< 0.01). Tongue coating scores decreased in both tongue brushing and combined groups, but not in the oral probiotics group. Both tongue brushing and oral probiotics were effective in reducing halitosis, with the combined intervention producing the most significant and sustained improvements.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Breath Research is dedicated to all aspects of scientific breath research. The traditional focus is on analysis of volatile compounds and aerosols in exhaled breath for the investigation of exogenous exposures, metabolism, toxicology, health status and the diagnosis of disease and breath odours. The journal also welcomes other breath-related topics.
Typical areas of interest include:
Big laboratory instrumentation: describing new state-of-the-art analytical instrumentation capable of performing high-resolution discovery and targeted breath research; exploiting complex technologies drawn from other areas of biochemistry and genetics for breath research.
Engineering solutions: developing new breath sampling technologies for condensate and aerosols, for chemical and optical sensors, for extraction and sample preparation methods, for automation and standardization, and for multiplex analyses to preserve the breath matrix and facilitating analytical throughput. Measure exhaled constituents (e.g. CO2, acetone, isoprene) as markers of human presence or mitigate such contaminants in enclosed environments.
Human and animal in vivo studies: decoding the ''breath exposome'', implementing exposure and intervention studies, performing cross-sectional and case-control research, assaying immune and inflammatory response, and testing mammalian host response to infections and exogenous exposures to develop information directly applicable to systems biology. Studying inhalation toxicology; inhaled breath as a source of internal dose; resultant blood, breath and urinary biomarkers linked to inhalation pathway.
Cellular and molecular level in vitro studies.
Clinical, pharmacological and forensic applications.
Mathematical, statistical and graphical data interpretation.