Tongue brushing and oral probiotics for the treatment of halitosis: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Li Mei, Fay Yan, Lei Cheng, Aishah Na, Richard D Cannon, Guangzhao Guan
{"title":"Tongue brushing and oral probiotics for the treatment of halitosis: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Li Mei, Fay Yan, Lei Cheng, Aishah Na, Richard D Cannon, Guangzhao Guan","doi":"10.1088/1752-7163/ae3edc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the effectiveness and sustainability of oral probiotics (<i>Streptococcus salivarius</i>K12), tongue brushing, and their combination in reducing halitosis. The study was a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. A total of 80 participants were randomly allocated to four groups: control (<i>n</i>= 20), oral probiotics (<i>n</i>= 20), tongue brushing (<i>n</i>= 20), and a combined group of tongue brushing and oral probiotics (<i>n</i>= 20). Assessments were taken at three time points: at baseline; after a 4-week intervention; and at a 4-week intervention-free follow-up. The outcome measurements included volatile sulfur compound (VSC), self-reported halitosis, organoleptic score, and tongue coating index. After the 4-week intervention, VSC levels were significantly decreased in the oral probiotics, tongue brushing, and combined groups (all<i>p</i>< 0.05), with the greatest reduction observed in the combined group. At the 4-week intervention-free follow-up, the combined group VSC levels remained significantly lower than baseline, despite slight rebounds. Self-reported halitosis scores decreased after intervention and follow-up (<i>p</i>< 0.05). Organoleptic scores improved only in the combined group post-intervention (<i>p</i>< 0.01). Tongue coating scores decreased in both tongue brushing and combined groups, but not in the oral probiotics group. Both tongue brushing and oral probiotics were effective in reducing halitosis, with the combined intervention producing the most significant and sustained improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":15306,"journal":{"name":"Journal of breath research","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of breath research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/ae3edc","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate the effectiveness and sustainability of oral probiotics (Streptococcus salivariusK12), tongue brushing, and their combination in reducing halitosis. The study was a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. A total of 80 participants were randomly allocated to four groups: control (n= 20), oral probiotics (n= 20), tongue brushing (n= 20), and a combined group of tongue brushing and oral probiotics (n= 20). Assessments were taken at three time points: at baseline; after a 4-week intervention; and at a 4-week intervention-free follow-up. The outcome measurements included volatile sulfur compound (VSC), self-reported halitosis, organoleptic score, and tongue coating index. After the 4-week intervention, VSC levels were significantly decreased in the oral probiotics, tongue brushing, and combined groups (allp< 0.05), with the greatest reduction observed in the combined group. At the 4-week intervention-free follow-up, the combined group VSC levels remained significantly lower than baseline, despite slight rebounds. Self-reported halitosis scores decreased after intervention and follow-up (p< 0.05). Organoleptic scores improved only in the combined group post-intervention (p< 0.01). Tongue coating scores decreased in both tongue brushing and combined groups, but not in the oral probiotics group. Both tongue brushing and oral probiotics were effective in reducing halitosis, with the combined intervention producing the most significant and sustained improvements.

刷舌和口服益生菌治疗口臭:一项随机对照试验。
评估口腔益生菌(唾液链球菌k12)、刷舌及其联合使用对减轻口臭的有效性和可持续性。该研究是一项前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照试验。共有80名参与者被随机分为四组:对照组(n= 20),口服益生菌组(n= 20),刷舌组(n= 20),刷舌组和口服益生菌组(n= 20)。评估在三个时间点进行:基线;干预4周后;在为期4周的无干预随访中。结果测量包括挥发性硫化合物(VSC)、自我报告的口臭、感官评分和舌苔指数。干预4周后,口服益生菌组、刷舌组和联合组的VSC水平均显著降低(均p< 0.05),以联合组降低幅度最大。在4周的无干预随访中,联合组VSC水平尽管略有反弹,但仍显着低于基线水平。干预和随访后,自报口臭评分下降(p< 0.05)。干预后仅联合组的感官评分有改善(p< 0.01)。刷舌组和联合组舌苔评分下降,但口服益生菌组没有。刷舌和口服益生菌对减少口臭都有效,联合干预产生最显著和持续的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of breath research
Journal of breath research BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
21.10%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Breath Research is dedicated to all aspects of scientific breath research. The traditional focus is on analysis of volatile compounds and aerosols in exhaled breath for the investigation of exogenous exposures, metabolism, toxicology, health status and the diagnosis of disease and breath odours. The journal also welcomes other breath-related topics. Typical areas of interest include: Big laboratory instrumentation: describing new state-of-the-art analytical instrumentation capable of performing high-resolution discovery and targeted breath research; exploiting complex technologies drawn from other areas of biochemistry and genetics for breath research. Engineering solutions: developing new breath sampling technologies for condensate and aerosols, for chemical and optical sensors, for extraction and sample preparation methods, for automation and standardization, and for multiplex analyses to preserve the breath matrix and facilitating analytical throughput. Measure exhaled constituents (e.g. CO2, acetone, isoprene) as markers of human presence or mitigate such contaminants in enclosed environments. Human and animal in vivo studies: decoding the ''breath exposome'', implementing exposure and intervention studies, performing cross-sectional and case-control research, assaying immune and inflammatory response, and testing mammalian host response to infections and exogenous exposures to develop information directly applicable to systems biology. Studying inhalation toxicology; inhaled breath as a source of internal dose; resultant blood, breath and urinary biomarkers linked to inhalation pathway. Cellular and molecular level in vitro studies. Clinical, pharmacological and forensic applications. Mathematical, statistical and graphical data interpretation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书