{"title":"Text mining-based profiling of chemical environments in protein–ligand binding assays across analytical techniques","authors":"Erdem Önal , Zeynep Kalaycıoğlu","doi":"10.1016/j.chemolab.2026.105659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Protein–ligand binding studies are critical in drug discovery and development, as they offer valuable insights into molecular interactions that underlie biological function, disease mechanisms, and therapeutic effects. The potential of combining text mining with cheminformatics to explore trends in protein–ligand binding studies across a range of analytical techniques was evaluated in this study. Six widely used analytical techniques were selected to reveal important patterns. Utilizing an open-source Python platform (SCOPE), we analyzed over 33,000 scientific articles and more than 1.3 million chemical entities. The resulting data were visualized as two-dimensional hexbin plots, revealing trends in hydrophobicity (log P)–molecular weight (Da) for each technique. Instead of focusing solely on ligands, this study aims to characterize the overall chemical environments—including solvents, buffers, and supporting agents—associated with protein–ligand binding assays. By analyzing the physicochemical properties of compounds reported across different analytical techniques, we highlight how method-specific preferences shape the experimental design landscape. The analysis integrates unsupervised K-means clustering, multivariate principal component analysis (PCA), and nonparametric statistical testing to quantitatively compare technique-associated chemical spaces. Moreover, this study offers a data-driven perspective on methodologies and historical trends in protein–ligand binding research. It is positioned as a data-driven, method-centric literature analysis rather than a traditional narrative review.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9774,"journal":{"name":"Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems","volume":"271 ","pages":"Article 105659"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169743926000328","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Protein–ligand binding studies are critical in drug discovery and development, as they offer valuable insights into molecular interactions that underlie biological function, disease mechanisms, and therapeutic effects. The potential of combining text mining with cheminformatics to explore trends in protein–ligand binding studies across a range of analytical techniques was evaluated in this study. Six widely used analytical techniques were selected to reveal important patterns. Utilizing an open-source Python platform (SCOPE), we analyzed over 33,000 scientific articles and more than 1.3 million chemical entities. The resulting data were visualized as two-dimensional hexbin plots, revealing trends in hydrophobicity (log P)–molecular weight (Da) for each technique. Instead of focusing solely on ligands, this study aims to characterize the overall chemical environments—including solvents, buffers, and supporting agents—associated with protein–ligand binding assays. By analyzing the physicochemical properties of compounds reported across different analytical techniques, we highlight how method-specific preferences shape the experimental design landscape. The analysis integrates unsupervised K-means clustering, multivariate principal component analysis (PCA), and nonparametric statistical testing to quantitatively compare technique-associated chemical spaces. Moreover, this study offers a data-driven perspective on methodologies and historical trends in protein–ligand binding research. It is positioned as a data-driven, method-centric literature analysis rather than a traditional narrative review.
期刊介绍:
Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems publishes original research papers, short communications, reviews, tutorials and Original Software Publications reporting on development of novel statistical, mathematical, or computer techniques in Chemistry and related disciplines.
Chemometrics is the chemical discipline that uses mathematical and statistical methods to design or select optimal procedures and experiments, and to provide maximum chemical information by analysing chemical data.
The journal deals with the following topics:
1) Development of new statistical, mathematical and chemometrical methods for Chemistry and related fields (Environmental Chemistry, Biochemistry, Toxicology, System Biology, -Omics, etc.)
2) Novel applications of chemometrics to all branches of Chemistry and related fields (typical domains of interest are: process data analysis, experimental design, data mining, signal processing, supervised modelling, decision making, robust statistics, mixture analysis, multivariate calibration etc.) Routine applications of established chemometrical techniques will not be considered.
3) Development of new software that provides novel tools or truly advances the use of chemometrical methods.
4) Well characterized data sets to test performance for the new methods and software.
The journal complies with International Committee of Medical Journal Editors'' Uniform requirements for manuscripts.