Kierkegaard’s Hidden Anthropology: Humanity’s Telos in the Teleological Suspension of the Ethical

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Armen Oganessian
{"title":"Kierkegaard’s Hidden Anthropology: Humanity’s Telos in the Teleological Suspension of the Ethical","authors":"Armen Oganessian","doi":"10.1111/heyj.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper presents a specific interpretation of the teleological suspension of the ethical. It argues that the suspension presupposes a theocentric anthropology in which humanity’s telos finds fulfilment in relationship with God. In performing the suspension, the individual fulfils their telos. The argument develops by situating the suspension within Kierkegaard’s broader authorship. <i>Either/Or</i>, <i>Repetition</i>, and <i>Fear and Trembling</i> are analysed as interconnected works that trace <i>Stages on Life’s Way’s</i> existential trajectory, where one moves from the aesthetic to the ethical and finally to the religious stage. Each transition occurs through a negation of the self and resulting despair. The aesthetic life fails because it grounds identity in externality, thereby undermining authenticity. The ethical life fails because it detaches duty from the person, once again denying authenticity. Initiated by the teleological suspension, the religious stage occurs when the self relates directly to God, achieving authenticity. To achieve authenticity, however, the religious stage must presuppose a theocentric anthropology in which one’s telos finds fulfilment in relation to God. It does so because only within such an anthropology does an individual gain authenticity and avoid the despair of the earlier stages by performing the suspension.</p>","PeriodicalId":54105,"journal":{"name":"HEYTHROP JOURNAL","volume":"67 1","pages":"53-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HEYTHROP JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/heyj.70018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a specific interpretation of the teleological suspension of the ethical. It argues that the suspension presupposes a theocentric anthropology in which humanity’s telos finds fulfilment in relationship with God. In performing the suspension, the individual fulfils their telos. The argument develops by situating the suspension within Kierkegaard’s broader authorship. Either/Or, Repetition, and Fear and Trembling are analysed as interconnected works that trace Stages on Life’s Way’s existential trajectory, where one moves from the aesthetic to the ethical and finally to the religious stage. Each transition occurs through a negation of the self and resulting despair. The aesthetic life fails because it grounds identity in externality, thereby undermining authenticity. The ethical life fails because it detaches duty from the person, once again denying authenticity. Initiated by the teleological suspension, the religious stage occurs when the self relates directly to God, achieving authenticity. To achieve authenticity, however, the religious stage must presuppose a theocentric anthropology in which one’s telos finds fulfilment in relation to God. It does so because only within such an anthropology does an individual gain authenticity and avoid the despair of the earlier stages by performing the suspension.

克尔凯郭尔的隐藏人类学:伦理学的目的论中止中的人类的目的
本文对伦理学的目的论悬置作了具体的解释。它认为这种悬停预设了一种以神为中心的人类学,在这种人类学中,人类的终极目标在与上帝的关系中找到了实现。在执行悬浮时,个人实现了他们的目的。这个论点是通过将这种暂停置于克尔凯郭尔更广泛的著作中来发展的。《要么/要么》、《重复》和《恐惧与颤抖》被分析为相互关联的作品,它们追踪了生命之路存在轨迹的各个阶段,从审美到伦理,最后到宗教阶段。每一次转变都是通过对自我的否定和由此产生的绝望而发生的。审美生活之所以失败,是因为它将身份建立在外部性之上,从而破坏了真实性。伦理生活之所以失败,是因为它把责任从人身上剥离出来,再次否定了真实性。在目的论中止的启动下,宗教阶段发生在自我直接与上帝联系,实现真实性的时候。然而,为了实现真实性,宗教阶段必须以一个以神为中心的人类学为前提,在这个人类学中,人们的终极目标在与上帝的关系中得到实现。它之所以这样做,是因为只有在这样的人类学中,个人才能获得真实性,并通过执行暂停来避免早期阶段的绝望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HEYTHROP JOURNAL
HEYTHROP JOURNAL Multiple-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Founded on the conviction that the disciplines of theology and philosophy have much to gain from their mutual interaction, The Heythrop Journal provides a medium of publication for scholars in each of these fields and encourages interdisciplinary comment and debate. The Heythrop Journal embraces all the disciplines which contribute to theological and philosophical research, notably hermeneutics, exegesis, linguistics, history, religious studies, philosophy of religion, sociology, psychology, ethics and pastoral theology. The Heythrop Journal is invaluable for scholars, teachers, students and general readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书