Thermoeconomic and environmental co-optimization of diesel combined heat and power systems via compression ratio tuning: Parametric study for residential application

IF 2.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy Pub Date : 2026-01-30 Epub Date: 2025-11-10 DOI:10.1002/ep.70172
Behrad Alizadeh Kharkeshi
{"title":"Thermoeconomic and environmental co-optimization of diesel combined heat and power systems via compression ratio tuning: Parametric study for residential application","authors":"Behrad Alizadeh Kharkeshi","doi":"10.1002/ep.70172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study addresses key research gaps in diesel engine-based combined heat and power (CHP) systems by presenting the very first overall Energy, Exergy, Economic, and Environmental (4E) investigation of compression ratio optimization. Unlike previous research, this research uniquely demonstrates that optimization of the in-built compression ratio in diesel-CHP systems can alone result in significant efficiency, economic, and environmental improvements. This novel 4E analysis and optimization approach opens up a new design pathway via quantification of multi-objective trade-offs of compression ratio modulation, thereby advancing CHP system design beyond peripheral retrofits. It has been demonstrated that raising the compression ratio (14:25) elevates engine power output by 44% and recoverable heat, to as much as 89.5% CHP efficiency. These advantages are realized, however, at severe costs: 6.8% more exergy destruction and 10.3% less carbon emission savings (CDER). To mitigate these trade-offs, a novel multi-objective genetic algorithm framework was developed with normalized objectives. Optimization returns cr = 20.11 as the Pareto-optimal solution, trading off 89.13% CHP efficiency, 0.2469 $/kWh energy cost, moderated exergy destruction (44.7 kJ/kg), and sustainable CDER (0.2389). Above all, the Pareto frontier delineates actionable design regimes: sustainability-focused applications favor cr = 14–18.89 (high emission reduction), while efficiency-focused systems operate at cr = 20.11–25 (peak <i>η</i><sub>CHP</sub>).</p>","PeriodicalId":11701,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ep.70172","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study addresses key research gaps in diesel engine-based combined heat and power (CHP) systems by presenting the very first overall Energy, Exergy, Economic, and Environmental (4E) investigation of compression ratio optimization. Unlike previous research, this research uniquely demonstrates that optimization of the in-built compression ratio in diesel-CHP systems can alone result in significant efficiency, economic, and environmental improvements. This novel 4E analysis and optimization approach opens up a new design pathway via quantification of multi-objective trade-offs of compression ratio modulation, thereby advancing CHP system design beyond peripheral retrofits. It has been demonstrated that raising the compression ratio (14:25) elevates engine power output by 44% and recoverable heat, to as much as 89.5% CHP efficiency. These advantages are realized, however, at severe costs: 6.8% more exergy destruction and 10.3% less carbon emission savings (CDER). To mitigate these trade-offs, a novel multi-objective genetic algorithm framework was developed with normalized objectives. Optimization returns cr = 20.11 as the Pareto-optimal solution, trading off 89.13% CHP efficiency, 0.2469 $/kWh energy cost, moderated exergy destruction (44.7 kJ/kg), and sustainable CDER (0.2389). Above all, the Pareto frontier delineates actionable design regimes: sustainability-focused applications favor cr = 14–18.89 (high emission reduction), while efficiency-focused systems operate at cr = 20.11–25 (peak ηCHP).

通过压缩比调整的柴油热电联产系统的热经济和环境协同优化:住宅应用的参数化研究
本研究通过首次对压缩比优化进行全面的能源、能源、经济和环境(4E)研究,解决了基于柴油机的热电联产(CHP)系统的关键研究空白。与以往的研究不同,这项研究独特地证明了优化柴油-热电联产系统的内置压缩比可以显著提高效率、经济效益和环境。这种新颖的4E分析和优化方法通过量化压缩比调制的多目标权衡开辟了一条新的设计途径,从而推动了热电联产系统设计超越外围改造。研究表明,提高压缩比(14:25)可使发动机输出功率提高44%,可回收热量达到89.5%的热电联产效率。然而,实现这些优势需要付出高昂的代价:减少6.8%的能源消耗,减少10.3%的碳排放(CDER)。为了减轻这些权衡,开发了一种具有归一化目标的多目标遗传算法框架。优化结果cr = 20.11作为pareto最优解,权衡了89.13%的热电联产效率,0.2469美元/千瓦时的能源成本,适度的火用破坏(44.7 kJ/kg)和可持续的CDER(0.2389)。最重要的是,帕累托边界描述了可行的设计制度:以可持续性为重点的应用有利于cr = 14-18.89(高减排),而以效率为重点的系统运行在cr = 20.11-25(峰值ηCHP)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
231
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Progress , a quarterly publication of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, reports on critical issues like remediation and treatment of solid or aqueous wastes, air pollution, sustainability, and sustainable energy. Each issue helps chemical engineers (and those in related fields) stay on top of technological advances in all areas associated with the environment through feature articles, updates, book and software reviews, and editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书