How institutions think: Reproductive health services and migrant women in Italy

IF 2.6 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Pamela Pasian, Giuliana Sanò, Francesco Della Puppa
{"title":"How institutions think: Reproductive health services and migrant women in Italy","authors":"Pamela Pasian,&nbsp;Giuliana Sanò,&nbsp;Francesco Della Puppa","doi":"10.1111/1467-8322.70050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Health and social services in Italy frequently essentialize migrant women's reproductive choices as products of ‘culture’ rather than responses to structural barriers, precarious conditions or institutional failures of listening. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork conducted in Verona in 2018 – including focus groups and interviews with both practitioners and migrant women – this article analyses how, to paraphrase Mary Douglas, reproductive health services ‘think’. Practitioners’ narratives reveal persistent patterns of infantilization and cultural stereotyping, while migrant women's testimonies point to experiences of obstetrical violence and alienation. Yet some street-level bureaucrats resist these institutional logics, opening space for more reflexive care practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":46293,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology Today","volume":"42 1","pages":"13-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://rai.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8322.70050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health and social services in Italy frequently essentialize migrant women's reproductive choices as products of ‘culture’ rather than responses to structural barriers, precarious conditions or institutional failures of listening. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork conducted in Verona in 2018 – including focus groups and interviews with both practitioners and migrant women – this article analyses how, to paraphrase Mary Douglas, reproductive health services ‘think’. Practitioners’ narratives reveal persistent patterns of infantilization and cultural stereotyping, while migrant women's testimonies point to experiences of obstetrical violence and alienation. Yet some street-level bureaucrats resist these institutional logics, opening space for more reflexive care practices.

机构如何思考:意大利的生殖健康服务和移民妇女
意大利的卫生和社会服务部门经常将移徙妇女的生育选择定性为“文化”的产物,而不是对结构性障碍、不稳定条件或缺乏倾听的体制的反应。根据2018年在维罗纳进行的人种学田野调查——包括焦点小组和对从业者和移民妇女的采访——本文分析了玛丽·道格拉斯(Mary Douglas)的说法,生殖健康服务是如何“思考”的。从业人员的叙述揭示了婴儿化和文化刻板印象的持续模式,而移民妇女的证词则指出了产科暴力和异化的经历。然而,一些基层官僚抵制这些制度逻辑,为更多的反射性护理实践开辟了空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anthropology Today
Anthropology Today ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Anthropology Today is a bimonthly publication which aims to provide a forum for the application of anthropological analysis to public and topical issues, while reflecting the breadth of interests within the discipline of anthropology. It is also committed to promoting debate at the interface between anthropology and areas of applied knowledge such as education, medicine, development etc. as well as that between anthropology and other academic disciplines. Anthropology Today encourages submissions on a wide range of topics, consistent with these aims. Anthropology Today is an international journal both in the scope of issues it covers and in the sources it draws from.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书