Diagnostic differences in glycemic markers for detecting impaired glucose tolerance in Black African and White European men in the United Kingdom: The SOUL-DEEP cross-sectional study

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Journal of Diabetes Investigation Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-07 DOI:10.1111/jdi.70251
Louise M. Goff, Gráinne Whelehan, Toyosi Bello, Anneka Ghafar, Meera Ladwa, Danielle H. Bodicoat, Melinda Stanners, Stephanie A. Amiel
{"title":"Diagnostic differences in glycemic markers for detecting impaired glucose tolerance in Black African and White European men in the United Kingdom: The SOUL-DEEP cross-sectional study","authors":"Louise M. Goff,&nbsp;Gráinne Whelehan,&nbsp;Toyosi Bello,&nbsp;Anneka Ghafar,&nbsp;Meera Ladwa,&nbsp;Danielle H. Bodicoat,&nbsp;Melinda Stanners,&nbsp;Stephanie A. Amiel","doi":"10.1111/jdi.70251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ethnic differences in type 2 diabetes risk highlight the need for accurate detection of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) across all ethnic groups. This study assessed the sensitivity and specificity of HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and 1-h plasma glucose for identifying IGT in 66 Black African (BA) and 77 White European (WE) men. Participants underwent a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test, and diagnostic performance was evaluated using ROC analyses. One-hour glucose showed the highest sensitivity (BA 77.8%, WE 94.1%) and AUC (0.78), whereas FPG 6.1–6.9 mmol/L had the poorest sensitivity (≤7.4%) and lowest AUC (0.49). HbA1c demonstrated ethnic variation: WHO criteria (6.0–6.4%) were more sensitive but less specific in BA than WE men; ADA criteria (5.7–6.4%) showed reduced specificity in BA men. Optimal cut-points differed by ethnicity for all markers. Findings suggest HbA1c and FPG may inadequately detect IGT, while 1-h glucose offers superior diagnostic performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":51250,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","volume":"17 4","pages":"622-626"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13042611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jdi.70251","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ethnic differences in type 2 diabetes risk highlight the need for accurate detection of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) across all ethnic groups. This study assessed the sensitivity and specificity of HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and 1-h plasma glucose for identifying IGT in 66 Black African (BA) and 77 White European (WE) men. Participants underwent a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test, and diagnostic performance was evaluated using ROC analyses. One-hour glucose showed the highest sensitivity (BA 77.8%, WE 94.1%) and AUC (0.78), whereas FPG 6.1–6.9 mmol/L had the poorest sensitivity (≤7.4%) and lowest AUC (0.49). HbA1c demonstrated ethnic variation: WHO criteria (6.0–6.4%) were more sensitive but less specific in BA than WE men; ADA criteria (5.7–6.4%) showed reduced specificity in BA men. Optimal cut-points differed by ethnicity for all markers. Findings suggest HbA1c and FPG may inadequately detect IGT, while 1-h glucose offers superior diagnostic performance.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在英国,非洲黑人和欧洲白人男性检测糖耐量受损的血糖标志物的诊断差异:SOUL-DEEP横断面研究。
2型糖尿病风险的种族差异强调了在所有种族中准确检测糖耐量受损(IGT)的必要性。本研究评估了66名非洲黑人(BA)和77名欧洲白人(WE)男性中HbA1c、空腹血糖(FPG)和1小时血糖用于识别IGT的敏感性和特异性。参与者接受75 g口服葡萄糖耐量试验,并使用ROC分析评估诊断表现。1 h葡萄糖的敏感性最高(BA 77.8%, WE 94.1%), AUC为0.78,而FPG 6.1 ~ 6.9 mmol/L的敏感性最差(≤7.4%),AUC最低(0.49)。HbA1c表现出种族差异:WHO标准(6.0-6.4%)在BA中比WE男性更敏感,但特异性较低;ADA标准(5.7-6.4%)显示BA男性的特异性降低。所有标记的最佳分界点因种族而异。研究结果表明,HbA1c和FPG可能不能充分检测IGT,而1-h葡萄糖具有更好的诊断性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes Investigation
Journal of Diabetes Investigation ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Diabetes Investigation is your core diabetes journal from Asia; the official journal of the Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD). The journal publishes original research, country reports, commentaries, reviews, mini-reviews, case reports, letters, as well as editorials and news. Embracing clinical and experimental research in diabetes and related areas, the Journal of Diabetes Investigation includes aspects of prevention, treatment, as well as molecular aspects and pathophysiology. Translational research focused on the exchange of ideas between clinicians and researchers is also welcome. Journal of Diabetes Investigation is indexed by Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书