Access technologies for people with significant motor impairment with potential to impact speed and/or accuracy of communication: a scoping review.

IF 1.6
Annemarie Murphy, Sabrina Schaly, Darryl Chiu, Amelia Mitchell, Christina Shen, Geetika Maddirala, Tarkeshwar Singh, Alistair McEwan, Petra Karlsson
{"title":"Access technologies for people with significant motor impairment with potential to impact speed and/or accuracy of communication: a scoping review.","authors":"Annemarie Murphy, Sabrina Schaly, Darryl Chiu, Amelia Mitchell, Christina Shen, Geetika Maddirala, Tarkeshwar Singh, Alistair McEwan, Petra Karlsson","doi":"10.1080/07434618.2026.2619160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals with significant communication and physical impairments often rely on augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) to facilitate independent communication across a range of communication partners and settings. Due to physical impairments, many individuals require alternate methods to access AAC systems, known as access technologies. While access technologies have advanced, they remain considerably slower than verbal communication. This scoping review explored recent advances in access technologies published between 2019 and 2024, focusing on technologies that facilitate communication speed and/or accuracy for individuals of any age with physical disabilities. Forty-six studies met inclusion criteria, covering a range of technologies such as brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), eye-tracking technology, and novel applications, such as a mixed reality AAC environment and multimodal access approaches (e.g., integrated eye-tracking with switch scanning, hybrid BCI eye-tracking). Despite technological progress, fewer than one-third of studies addressed the role of communication partners in setup and support, highlighting a gap in user-centred design. Findings are discussed in terms of practical applications and emerging directions for technology development. Implications for clinical practice and future research include the need for inclusive design, improved usability, and greater consideration of communication partner involvement in AAC access solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":520566,"journal":{"name":"Augmentative and alternative communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985)","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Augmentative and alternative communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2026.2619160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individuals with significant communication and physical impairments often rely on augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) to facilitate independent communication across a range of communication partners and settings. Due to physical impairments, many individuals require alternate methods to access AAC systems, known as access technologies. While access technologies have advanced, they remain considerably slower than verbal communication. This scoping review explored recent advances in access technologies published between 2019 and 2024, focusing on technologies that facilitate communication speed and/or accuracy for individuals of any age with physical disabilities. Forty-six studies met inclusion criteria, covering a range of technologies such as brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), eye-tracking technology, and novel applications, such as a mixed reality AAC environment and multimodal access approaches (e.g., integrated eye-tracking with switch scanning, hybrid BCI eye-tracking). Despite technological progress, fewer than one-third of studies addressed the role of communication partners in setup and support, highlighting a gap in user-centred design. Findings are discussed in terms of practical applications and emerging directions for technology development. Implications for clinical practice and future research include the need for inclusive design, improved usability, and greater consideration of communication partner involvement in AAC access solutions.

可能影响沟通速度和/或准确性的严重运动障碍患者的无障碍技术:范围审查。
有严重沟通障碍和身体障碍的个体通常依靠辅助和替代沟通(AAC)来促进在一系列沟通伙伴和环境中的独立沟通。由于身体缺陷,许多人需要替代方法来访问AAC系统,称为访问技术。虽然访问技术已经进步,但它们仍然比口头交流慢得多。本次范围界定审查探讨了2019年至2024年期间发布的无障碍技术的最新进展,重点是促进任何年龄的身体残疾人士通信速度和/或准确性的技术。46项研究符合纳入标准,涵盖了脑机接口(BCI)、眼动追踪技术等一系列技术,以及混合现实AAC环境和多模态访问方法(如集成眼动追踪与开关扫描、混合BCI眼动追踪)等新应用。尽管技术进步,但只有不到三分之一的研究涉及沟通伙伴在设置和支持方面的作用,突出了以用户为中心的设计方面的差距。研究结果从实际应用和技术发展的新兴方向进行了讨论。对临床实践和未来研究的启示包括需要包容性设计,改进可用性,以及更多地考虑通信伙伴参与AAC接入解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书