A scoping review of augmentative and alternative communication use in children with childhood apraxia of speech.

IF 1.6
Sophie Adams, Kate Zakrzewski, Tahlia King, Savannah Vecchio, Jacqueline Lim, Clancy Conlon
{"title":"A scoping review of augmentative and alternative communication use in children with childhood apraxia of speech.","authors":"Sophie Adams, Kate Zakrzewski, Tahlia King, Savannah Vecchio, Jacqueline Lim, Clancy Conlon","doi":"10.1080/07434618.2026.2619162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior research has highlighted the positive impact of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) on speech and language development for children who cannot use speech alone. However, little is known about AAC use specifically for children with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). Therefore, the purpose of this scoping review was to identify and synthesize twenty years of research investigating AAC use in children with CAS and determine gaps. A systematic search strategy was employed to identify relevant literature in five databases. Abstract and full-text screening was conducted by all authors. Forward and backward citation chaining was completed resulting in a total of 11 eligible studies. Study results were synthesized within three categories: therapy focused, profile and perspective studies. All studies highlighted that early AAC intervention may optimize communication outcomes for children with CAS. Therapy focused studies demonstrated that AAC fulfills a complementary role in the management of CAS. Perspective studies demonstrated that there are a variety of factors which influenced a SLP's decision making surrounding AAC implementation for children with CAS. While prior systematic reviews have demonstrated the positive impact of AAC on speech production broadly, this review uniquely focuses on AAC use in children with CAS.</p>","PeriodicalId":520566,"journal":{"name":"Augmentative and alternative communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985)","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Augmentative and alternative communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2026.2619162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior research has highlighted the positive impact of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) on speech and language development for children who cannot use speech alone. However, little is known about AAC use specifically for children with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). Therefore, the purpose of this scoping review was to identify and synthesize twenty years of research investigating AAC use in children with CAS and determine gaps. A systematic search strategy was employed to identify relevant literature in five databases. Abstract and full-text screening was conducted by all authors. Forward and backward citation chaining was completed resulting in a total of 11 eligible studies. Study results were synthesized within three categories: therapy focused, profile and perspective studies. All studies highlighted that early AAC intervention may optimize communication outcomes for children with CAS. Therapy focused studies demonstrated that AAC fulfills a complementary role in the management of CAS. Perspective studies demonstrated that there are a variety of factors which influenced a SLP's decision making surrounding AAC implementation for children with CAS. While prior systematic reviews have demonstrated the positive impact of AAC on speech production broadly, this review uniquely focuses on AAC use in children with CAS.

儿童言语失用症的辅助和替代沟通使用的范围回顾。
先前的研究强调了增强和替代沟通(AAC)对不能单独使用语言的儿童的言语和语言发展的积极影响。然而,对于儿童言语失用症(CAS)的AAC使用情况,我们所知甚少。因此,本综述的目的是识别和综合二十年来调查CAS儿童使用AAC的研究,并确定差距。采用系统检索策略在5个数据库中检索相关文献。所有作者均进行了摘要和全文筛选。完成了正向和反向引文链接,共有11篇符合条件的研究。研究结果分为三类:以治疗为重点的研究、概况研究和透视研究。所有研究都强调,早期AAC干预可以优化CAS儿童的沟通结果。以治疗为重点的研究表明,AAC在CAS的管理中发挥了补充作用。前瞻性研究表明,有多种因素会影响特殊情况下儿童儿童的辅助治疗决策。虽然之前的系统综述已经广泛地证明了AAC对言语产生的积极影响,但本综述独特地关注了CAS儿童中AAC的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书