Marie L Neumann, Amy Ladner, Jessica Y Allen, Swapna Kakani, Meghan H Rauen, David F Mercer
{"title":"Measuring disease-specific quality of life in pediatric intestinal failure: Development and validation of the PIF-QoL.","authors":"Marie L Neumann, Amy Ladner, Jessica Y Allen, Swapna Kakani, Meghan H Rauen, David F Mercer","doi":"10.1016/j.intf.2025.100324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research suggests pediatric intestinal failure (PIF) patients experience impaired quality of life (QoL), but no disease-specific instrument has been available to assess this patient population. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a PIF-specific QoL assessment tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our team of patient-, caregiver-, and clinician researchers developed a questionnaire to assess self- and proxy-reported QoL in PIF using a community-driven study design that included a literature review and exploratory study, review by content experts, focus groups and cognitive interviews with children, and the tool's implementation at a large U.S.-based PIF center. An initial psychometric evaluation was conducted to assess validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 181 caregivers of children (ages 4-18) with a history of PIF and 70 patients (ages 8-18) with a history of PIF completed the caregiver and child versions of the PIF-QoL, respectively, and were included in the internal consistency assessment. Test-retest reliability was assessed with a sample of 30 caregivers and 21 children who completed the questionnaires at two timepoints. Across both PIF-QoL versions, results suggest acceptable to good internal consistency and test-retest reliability for individual domains. One exception was the \"Food and Eating\" domain, which may warrant future refinement. Instrument internal consistency and test-retest reliability were excellent (Caregiver: α≥ 0.89, ICC= 0.90; Child: α≥ 0.83, ICC= 0.92).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Initial empirical testing and psychometric evaluation of the PIF-QoL support its use as a practical, valid, and reliable tool for assessing self- and proxy-reported QoL of patients with PIF.</p>","PeriodicalId":520517,"journal":{"name":"Intestinal Failure (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"8 ","pages":"100324"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12851342/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intestinal Failure (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intf.2025.100324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Research suggests pediatric intestinal failure (PIF) patients experience impaired quality of life (QoL), but no disease-specific instrument has been available to assess this patient population. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a PIF-specific QoL assessment tool.
Methods: Our team of patient-, caregiver-, and clinician researchers developed a questionnaire to assess self- and proxy-reported QoL in PIF using a community-driven study design that included a literature review and exploratory study, review by content experts, focus groups and cognitive interviews with children, and the tool's implementation at a large U.S.-based PIF center. An initial psychometric evaluation was conducted to assess validity and reliability.
Results: A total of 181 caregivers of children (ages 4-18) with a history of PIF and 70 patients (ages 8-18) with a history of PIF completed the caregiver and child versions of the PIF-QoL, respectively, and were included in the internal consistency assessment. Test-retest reliability was assessed with a sample of 30 caregivers and 21 children who completed the questionnaires at two timepoints. Across both PIF-QoL versions, results suggest acceptable to good internal consistency and test-retest reliability for individual domains. One exception was the "Food and Eating" domain, which may warrant future refinement. Instrument internal consistency and test-retest reliability were excellent (Caregiver: α≥ 0.89, ICC= 0.90; Child: α≥ 0.83, ICC= 0.92).
Conclusion: Initial empirical testing and psychometric evaluation of the PIF-QoL support its use as a practical, valid, and reliable tool for assessing self- and proxy-reported QoL of patients with PIF.