Measuring disease-specific quality of life in pediatric intestinal failure: Development and validation of the PIF-QoL.

Intestinal Failure (New York, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2025-11-13 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.intf.2025.100324
Marie L Neumann, Amy Ladner, Jessica Y Allen, Swapna Kakani, Meghan H Rauen, David F Mercer
{"title":"Measuring disease-specific quality of life in pediatric intestinal failure: Development and validation of the PIF-QoL.","authors":"Marie L Neumann, Amy Ladner, Jessica Y Allen, Swapna Kakani, Meghan H Rauen, David F Mercer","doi":"10.1016/j.intf.2025.100324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research suggests pediatric intestinal failure (PIF) patients experience impaired quality of life (QoL), but no disease-specific instrument has been available to assess this patient population. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a PIF-specific QoL assessment tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our team of patient-, caregiver-, and clinician researchers developed a questionnaire to assess self- and proxy-reported QoL in PIF using a community-driven study design that included a literature review and exploratory study, review by content experts, focus groups and cognitive interviews with children, and the tool's implementation at a large U.S.-based PIF center. An initial psychometric evaluation was conducted to assess validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 181 caregivers of children (ages 4-18) with a history of PIF and 70 patients (ages 8-18) with a history of PIF completed the caregiver and child versions of the PIF-QoL, respectively, and were included in the internal consistency assessment. Test-retest reliability was assessed with a sample of 30 caregivers and 21 children who completed the questionnaires at two timepoints. Across both PIF-QoL versions, results suggest acceptable to good internal consistency and test-retest reliability for individual domains. One exception was the \"Food and Eating\" domain, which may warrant future refinement. Instrument internal consistency and test-retest reliability were excellent (Caregiver: α≥ 0.89, ICC= 0.90; Child: α≥ 0.83, ICC= 0.92).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Initial empirical testing and psychometric evaluation of the PIF-QoL support its use as a practical, valid, and reliable tool for assessing self- and proxy-reported QoL of patients with PIF.</p>","PeriodicalId":520517,"journal":{"name":"Intestinal Failure (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"8 ","pages":"100324"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12851342/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intestinal Failure (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intf.2025.100324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research suggests pediatric intestinal failure (PIF) patients experience impaired quality of life (QoL), but no disease-specific instrument has been available to assess this patient population. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a PIF-specific QoL assessment tool.

Methods: Our team of patient-, caregiver-, and clinician researchers developed a questionnaire to assess self- and proxy-reported QoL in PIF using a community-driven study design that included a literature review and exploratory study, review by content experts, focus groups and cognitive interviews with children, and the tool's implementation at a large U.S.-based PIF center. An initial psychometric evaluation was conducted to assess validity and reliability.

Results: A total of 181 caregivers of children (ages 4-18) with a history of PIF and 70 patients (ages 8-18) with a history of PIF completed the caregiver and child versions of the PIF-QoL, respectively, and were included in the internal consistency assessment. Test-retest reliability was assessed with a sample of 30 caregivers and 21 children who completed the questionnaires at two timepoints. Across both PIF-QoL versions, results suggest acceptable to good internal consistency and test-retest reliability for individual domains. One exception was the "Food and Eating" domain, which may warrant future refinement. Instrument internal consistency and test-retest reliability were excellent (Caregiver: α≥ 0.89, ICC= 0.90; Child: α≥ 0.83, ICC= 0.92).

Conclusion: Initial empirical testing and psychometric evaluation of the PIF-QoL support its use as a practical, valid, and reliable tool for assessing self- and proxy-reported QoL of patients with PIF.

测量儿童肠衰竭疾病特异性生活质量:PIF-QoL的开发和验证
背景:研究表明,儿童肠衰竭(PIF)患者的生活质量(QoL)受损,但没有疾病特异性的工具可用于评估这一患者群体。本研究的目的是开发和验证pif特异性生活质量评估工具。方法:我们的研究团队由患者、护理人员和临床医生组成,采用社区驱动的研究设计,包括文献综述和探索性研究,内容专家的回顾,焦点小组和儿童的认知访谈,以及该工具在美国大型PIF中心的实施,开发了一份问卷来评估PIF中自我报告和代理报告的生活质量。进行初步的心理测量评估,以评估效度和信度。结果:共有181名有PIF病史的儿童的照顾者(4-18岁)和70名有PIF病史的患者(8-18岁)分别完成了照顾者和儿童版本的PIF- qol,并被纳入内部一致性评估。在两个时间点完成问卷的30名护理人员和21名儿童样本中评估了重测信度。在两个PIF-QoL版本中,结果表明可以接受良好的内部一致性和单个域的测试-重测可靠性。一个例外是“食物和饮食”领域,这可能需要未来的改进。仪器内部一致性和重测信度极好(护理者:α≥0.89,ICC= 0.90;儿童:α≥0.83,ICC= 0.92)。结论:PIF-QoL的初步实证测试和心理测量评估支持其作为评估PIF患者自我和代理报告的生活质量的实用、有效和可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书