Off-label treatment of atopic dermatitis and psoriasis.

IF 3.9
Julia Sternicka-Rohde, Leszek Bieniaszewski, Roman J Nowicki, Dorota Purzycka-Bohdan
{"title":"Off-label treatment of atopic dermatitis and psoriasis.","authors":"Julia Sternicka-Rohde, Leszek Bieniaszewski, Roman J Nowicki, Dorota Purzycka-Bohdan","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2026.2617768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Off-label prescribing is a common and often necessary practice in dermatology, as approved treatment options frequently fail to meet the diverse needs of patients. This is particularly relevant in the management of two prevalent inflammatory dermatoses - atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. Despite the widespread use of off-label therapies, their application often lacks formal guidance, highlighting the need for updated clinical recommendations and consideration of expanded drug indications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed medical records of 5072 patients with atopic dermatitis and/or psoriasis who were treated in Northern Poland between 2014 and 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was found that 62.5% of patients with atopic dermatitis and 25.7% of patients with psoriasis received some form of off-label treatment. The frequency of off-label therapy demonstrated an inverse correlation with patient age. On average, individuals managed with a combination of on-label and off-label therapies achieved greater reductions in EASI, PASI, and DLQI scores compared to those treated exclusively according to SmPC guidelines, with the statistically significant difference for PASI reductions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Off-label treatment is widely used in the management of both atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. Real-world evidence plays a crucial role in guiding clinical practice and should be leveraged to support the more evidence-based implementation of off-label therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"37 1","pages":"2617768"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2026.2617768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Off-label prescribing is a common and often necessary practice in dermatology, as approved treatment options frequently fail to meet the diverse needs of patients. This is particularly relevant in the management of two prevalent inflammatory dermatoses - atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. Despite the widespread use of off-label therapies, their application often lacks formal guidance, highlighting the need for updated clinical recommendations and consideration of expanded drug indications.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed medical records of 5072 patients with atopic dermatitis and/or psoriasis who were treated in Northern Poland between 2014 and 2024.

Results: It was found that 62.5% of patients with atopic dermatitis and 25.7% of patients with psoriasis received some form of off-label treatment. The frequency of off-label therapy demonstrated an inverse correlation with patient age. On average, individuals managed with a combination of on-label and off-label therapies achieved greater reductions in EASI, PASI, and DLQI scores compared to those treated exclusively according to SmPC guidelines, with the statistically significant difference for PASI reductions.

Conclusions: Off-label treatment is widely used in the management of both atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. Real-world evidence plays a crucial role in guiding clinical practice and should be leveraged to support the more evidence-based implementation of off-label therapies.

说明书外治疗特应性皮炎和牛皮癣。
目的:标签外处方是皮肤科常见且必要的做法,因为批准的治疗方案经常不能满足患者的多样化需求。这在两种常见的炎症性皮肤病——特应性皮炎和牛皮癣的治疗中尤为重要。尽管说明书外治疗被广泛使用,但它们的应用往往缺乏正式的指导,这突出了更新临床建议和考虑扩大药物适应症的必要性。方法:本回顾性研究分析了2014年至2024年在波兰北部治疗的5072例特应性皮炎和/或牛皮癣患者的医疗记录。结果:62.5%的特应性皮炎患者和25.7%的牛皮癣患者接受了某种形式的超说明书治疗。超说明书治疗的频率与患者年龄呈负相关。平均而言,与仅根据SmPC指南治疗的个体相比,使用标签上和标签外治疗组合治疗的个体在EASI, PASI和DLQI评分方面取得了更大的降低,PASI降低具有统计学意义。结论:超说明书治疗广泛应用于特应性皮炎和银屑病的治疗。真实世界的证据在指导临床实践中起着至关重要的作用,应该利用这些证据来支持更多基于证据的超说明书治疗的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书