TOP Flat Magnetic Stimulation therapy for post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence.

IF 1.3 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia Pub Date : 2026-03-31 Epub Date: 2026-02-05 DOI:10.4081/aiua.2026.14666
Nicola Mondaini, Fabio Crocerossa, Mauro Gacci, Francesco Cantiello, Irene Fusco, Alessandra Comito, Tiziano Zingoni, Rocco Damiano
{"title":"TOP Flat Magnetic Stimulation therapy for post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence.","authors":"Nicola Mondaini, Fabio Crocerossa, Mauro Gacci, Francesco Cantiello, Irene Fusco, Alessandra Comito, Tiziano Zingoni, Rocco Damiano","doi":"10.4081/aiua.2026.14666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The most frequent complication in subjects of a radical prostatectomy (RP) is represented by urinary incontinence (UI), which can arise following the destruction of the pelvic floor muscles.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this retrospective analysis was to assess the effect of Flat Magnetic Stimulation (FMS) in treating male stress urine incontinence (SUI) following RP.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 40 patients affected by SUI after RP, with a mean age of 56.8 (± 5.7) years old, underwent eight sessions with FMS. The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Short Form (IIQ-7) was administered from baseline up to 3 months of follow-up (3MFU) after the last treatment session. All possible adverse events were retrospective analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis demonstrates that the scores for each individual questionnaire item decreased from baseline up to 3MFU after the last treatment session, leading to a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in the total IIQ-7 median score from 71.35 (66.6-76.11) at baseline to 28.54 (38.05-23.78) at 3MFU after the last treatment session. No adverse events were recorded over the whole course of treatment.  Conclusions: Our findings reveal that this technology may serve as a convenient and alternative treatment option for stress-caused urinary incontinence following RP.</p>","PeriodicalId":46900,"journal":{"name":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","volume":" ","pages":"14666"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2026.14666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The most frequent complication in subjects of a radical prostatectomy (RP) is represented by urinary incontinence (UI), which can arise following the destruction of the pelvic floor muscles.

Objectives: The aim of this retrospective analysis was to assess the effect of Flat Magnetic Stimulation (FMS) in treating male stress urine incontinence (SUI) following RP.

Materials and methods: A total of 40 patients affected by SUI after RP, with a mean age of 56.8 (± 5.7) years old, underwent eight sessions with FMS. The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Short Form (IIQ-7) was administered from baseline up to 3 months of follow-up (3MFU) after the last treatment session. All possible adverse events were retrospective analysed.

Results: The analysis demonstrates that the scores for each individual questionnaire item decreased from baseline up to 3MFU after the last treatment session, leading to a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in the total IIQ-7 median score from 71.35 (66.6-76.11) at baseline to 28.54 (38.05-23.78) at 3MFU after the last treatment session. No adverse events were recorded over the whole course of treatment.  Conclusions: Our findings reveal that this technology may serve as a convenient and alternative treatment option for stress-caused urinary incontinence following RP.

TOP平面磁刺激治疗前列腺切除术后应激性尿失禁。
背景:根治性前列腺切除术(RP)患者最常见的并发症是尿失禁(UI),这可能在盆底肌肉破坏后出现。目的:本回顾性分析的目的是评估平板磁刺激(FMS)治疗RP后男性应激性尿失禁(SUI)的效果。材料和方法:共40例RP术后SUI患者,平均年龄56.8(±5.7)岁,接受8次FMS治疗。从基线到最后一次治疗后3个月的随访(3MFU),进行失禁影响问卷-短表格(IIQ-7)。回顾性分析所有可能的不良事件。结果:分析显示,最后一次治疗后,各问卷单项得分从基线下降至3MFU,导致IIQ-7总分中位数从基线时的71.35(66.6-76.11)下降至最后一次治疗后3MFU时的28.54(38.05-23.78),差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。在整个治疗过程中没有不良事件的记录。结论:我们的研究结果表明,该技术可作为RP后压力性尿失禁的方便和替代治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
35.70%
发文量
72
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书