Anne Wojtanowski, Côme Bureau, Mathieu Jeanne, Morgan Recher, Julien De Jonckheere
{"title":"Heart rate variability as a marker of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in deeply sedated, prepubescent patients: a secondary analysis.","authors":"Anne Wojtanowski, Côme Bureau, Mathieu Jeanne, Morgan Recher, Julien De Jonckheere","doi":"10.1007/s10877-026-01417-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) is a frequent complication in critically ill patients. The objective of the present study in a pediatric intensive care unit was to determine the feasibility of using HRV to differentiate between deeply sedated patients with medium/high MODS and those with no/low MODS. This was a secondary analysis of data from the ANI EP clinical study (NCT04913038). Various HRV indices were computed in a 10-minute time window. A patient with a pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) score higher than 5 was classified into the medium/high MODS group. Forty-seven patients were selected for analysis. The Energy variable (equivalent to the standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals) was significantly correlated with the pSOFA score (r²=-0.31, p = 0.03). HFnu values were higher in the medium/high MODS group than in the no/low MODS group (0.35 vs. 0.28, respectively; p = 0.019), and HFnu discriminated between the two groups of patients with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.75 (sensitivity = 0.78, specificity = 0.74). Energy was slightly but not significantly lower in the medium/high MODS group (0.17, vs. 0.35 in the no/mild MODS group; p = 0.086). The results of our study in a PICU showed that HRV indices can differentiate between deeply sedated patients with MODS and those without. Further investigations are needed to confirm this finding and extend it to other populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"601-609"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13194263/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-026-01417-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) is a frequent complication in critically ill patients. The objective of the present study in a pediatric intensive care unit was to determine the feasibility of using HRV to differentiate between deeply sedated patients with medium/high MODS and those with no/low MODS. This was a secondary analysis of data from the ANI EP clinical study (NCT04913038). Various HRV indices were computed in a 10-minute time window. A patient with a pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) score higher than 5 was classified into the medium/high MODS group. Forty-seven patients were selected for analysis. The Energy variable (equivalent to the standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals) was significantly correlated with the pSOFA score (r²=-0.31, p = 0.03). HFnu values were higher in the medium/high MODS group than in the no/low MODS group (0.35 vs. 0.28, respectively; p = 0.019), and HFnu discriminated between the two groups of patients with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.75 (sensitivity = 0.78, specificity = 0.74). Energy was slightly but not significantly lower in the medium/high MODS group (0.17, vs. 0.35 in the no/mild MODS group; p = 0.086). The results of our study in a PICU showed that HRV indices can differentiate between deeply sedated patients with MODS and those without. Further investigations are needed to confirm this finding and extend it to other populations.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine.
The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group.
The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.